compnerd closed this revision.
compnerd added a comment.
SVN r364352
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
craig.topper added a comment.
Yeah LAHF/SAHF just improves codegen. Lack of it won't result in any library
calls.
This patch LGTM
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
___
compnerd added a comment.
@craig.topper, hmm, what happens in terms of CG when LAHF/SAHF are not
available? I assume its just worse CG as you could spill AH onto the stack and
do a load/store. This actually results in library calls which may not be
possible to fulfill.
Repository:
rC Clan
compnerd updated this revision to Diff 206519.
compnerd added a comment.
Move test case around
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
Files:
lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp
test/Driver/clang-translation.c
craig.topper added a comment.
Another odd feature that's missing from early x86-64 CPUs is sahf.
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
compnerd updated this revision to Diff 206508.
compnerd added a comment.
add additional context and test case
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
Files:
lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp
test/Driver/andro
craig.topper added inline comments.
Comment at: test/Driver/android-default-x86_64.c:1
+// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux-android -c %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
+// CHECK: "-mcx16"
should we just update the android 64 case in clang-translation.c instea
compnerd added a comment.
@lebedev.ri - sure, I will add a driver test to ensure that the feature is set
on the command line when invoked from the driver, however, I don't think that
there is really much in terms of testing that you can do for this type of stuff
other than throw a large corpus
srhines accepted this revision.
srhines added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Craig, can you confirm that this is acceptable? I don't think there are any
chips with SSE4.2 but without cx16, so this just seemed like an oversight. It
might be a good idea to really audit
lebedev.ri added a comment.
Is there some test for this area of code?
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
compnerd created this revision.
compnerd added reviewers: craig.topper, srhines.
Herald added a subscriber: jfb.
Herald added a project: clang.
The android target assumes that for the x86_64 target, the CPU supports SSE4.2
and `popcnt`. This implies that the CPU is Nehalem or newer. This should
11 matches
Mail list logo