[PATCH] D62946: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson()

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL363187: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson() (authored by Charusso, committed by ). Herald added a project: LLVM. Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits. Changed prior to commit: https://

[PATCH] D62946: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson()

NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Aha, ok, right! I wouldn't be surprised if some of these are entirely unused. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62946/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D629

[PATCH] D62946: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson()

Charusso added a comment. In D62946#1533592 , @NoQ wrote: > Fair enough! > > Tests are welcome. Is it possible? E.g. I have not found any case for `PostCondition` and may it requires 10+ of dot dumps which is very space-consuming. I think test to print

[PATCH] D62946: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson()

NoQ added a comment. Fair enough! Tests are welcome. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62946/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62946 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llv

[PATCH] D62946: [analyzer] ProgramPoint: more explicit printJson()

Charusso created this revision. Charusso added reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, ravikandhadai, baloghadamsoftware, Szelethus. Charusso added a project: clang. Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, dkrupp, donat.nagy, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, rnkovacs, szepet. Now we print out every possible kinds