tejohnson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588#644637, @danielcdh wrote:
> Looks like this is still breaking these buildbots:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/3216/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Athinlto_backend.ll
>
> I reverted th
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Teresa Johnson via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> tejohnson added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588#644489, @danielcdh wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the prompt response.
> >
> > But looks like several other tests also has "-mllvm
> -debu
danielcdh added a comment.
Looks like this is still breaking these buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/3216/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Athinlto_backend.ll
I reverted the test change for now, and am thinking of how to reproduce/fix the
pr
danielcdh updated this revision to Diff 84193.
danielcdh added a comment.
Updates the unittests to clang_cc1 to see if it fixes the buildbot failure.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588
Files:
lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.ll
Index: test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.ll
=
tejohnson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588#644489, @danielcdh wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
> But looks like several other tests also has "-mllvm -debug-pass=Structure" in
> their tests:
>
> tools/clang/test/CodeGen/pgo-instrumentation.c
> test/CodeGen/Generic/ll
danielcdh added a comment.
Thanks for the prompt response.
But looks like several other tests also has "-mllvm -debug-pass=Structure" in
their tests:
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/pgo-instrumentation.c
test/CodeGen/Generic/llc-start-stop.ll
I just verified that if I cmake with -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Re
tejohnson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588#644472, @tejohnson wrote:
> Otherwise I think "; REQUIRES: asserts" might do the trick?
Looks like it - I looked at another test that used -debug output and it
requires asserts.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588
_
tejohnson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588#644467, @danielcdh wrote:
> The breaks some buildbots thus I reverted the patch:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/1889
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incremental_ch
danielcdh reopened this revision.
danielcdh added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
The breaks some buildbots thus I reverted the patch:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/1889
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incr
tejohnson accepted this revision.
tejohnson added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
danielcdh created this revision.
danielcdh added reviewers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini.
danielcdh added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
LTO backend will not invoke SampleProfileLoader pass even if
-fprofile-sample-use is specified. This patch passes the flag down so that pass
manager can add the SamplePr
11 matches
Mail list logo