erichkeane added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23692#520097, @erichkeane wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23692#520081, @rsmith wrote:
>
> > This is not a conforming extension. We are explicitly not allowed to make
> > standard library functions `constexpr` if the standard doesn't
erichkeane abandoned this revision.
erichkeane added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23692#520081, @rsmith wrote:
> This is not a conforming extension. We are explicitly not allowed to make
> standard library functions `constexpr` if the standard doesn't say they are;
> see [constexpr.f
rsmith requested changes to this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This is not a conforming extension. We are explicitly not allowed to make
standard library functions `constexpr` if the standard doesn't say they are;
see [constexpr.functions] (17.6
erichkeane created this revision.
erichkeane added reviewers: cfe-commits, majnemer, vbyakovl, DavidKreitzer,
andreybokhanko, rsmith.
erichkeane set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
GCC (and other compilers) treat strlen as a 'constexpr' function as an
extension to the language. Cla
