aaron.ballman marked an inline comment as done.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23453#515816, @rsmith wrote:
> This seems premature; according to the charter, we are more than three years
> away from the C2x committee draft phase. Perhaps we should wait until we have
rsmith added a comment.
This seems premature; according to the charter, we are more than three years
away from the C2x committee draft phase. Perhaps we should wait until we have
either a new working draft or a paper approved by the WG14 for such a working
draft.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D234
aaron.ballman marked an inline comment as done.
Comment at: include/clang/Frontend/LangStandards.def:94
@@ -93,1 +93,3 @@
+// C2X modes
+LANGSTANDARD(c2x, "c2x",
majnemer wrote:
> Should this be C2x instead of C2X?
Probably. :-D
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23453
majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
Comment at: include/clang/Frontend/LangStandards.def:94
@@ -93,1 +93,3 @@
+// C2X modes
+LANGSTANDARD(c2x, "c2x",
Should this be C2x instead of C2X?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23453
_
aaron.ballman created this revision.
aaron.ballman added reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor.
aaron.ballman added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch adds support for a "c2x" language standard mode for the eventual new
C language standard, expected to come out in 202x. The spelling and
capitalizati