vsk abandoned this revision.
vsk added a comment.
This isn't on my radar at the moment.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22943/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
dexonsmith requested changes to this revision.
dexonsmith added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Herald added subscribers: pengfei, fedor.sergeev, kristof.beyls, krytarowski.
Herald added a reviewer: JDevlieghere.
I'm not sure if you're still interested in pursuing this, b
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 08:50:59AM -0700, Vedant Kumar wrote:
>
> > On Jul 30, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:11:05PM +, Vedant Kumar wrote:
> >> - test/Driver/netbsd.c
> >>
> >>We see -mcpu=arm1022e instead of arm92
echristo added a comment.
Seems reasonable to fix the tests?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> On Jul 30, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:11:05PM +, Vedant Kumar wrote:
>> - test/Driver/netbsd.c
>>
>>We see -mcpu=arm1022e instead of arm926ej-s in a single run.
>
> Which one exactly?
Here is the test (test/Driver/
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:11:05PM +, Vedant Kumar wrote:
> - test/Driver/netbsd.c
>
> We see -mcpu=arm1022e instead of arm926ej-s in a single run.
Which one exactly?
Joerg
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists
vsk created this revision.
vsk added reviewers: echristo, dexonsmith.
vsk added subscribers: joerg, rengolin, cfe-commits.
Herald added subscribers: mehdi_amini, aemerson.
... even though we *should* be able to.
If we used effective triples at the marked sites, we would fail:
- test/Driver/{da
