Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-08-01 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL277368: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment (authored by jfb). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073?vs=66342&id=66356#toc Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-08-01 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
jfb added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073#486636, @EricWF wrote: > OK, IMO the way to handle this test is to have it manually link `-latomic`. > This can be done by renaming the test to `.sh.cpp` and adding the > following lines: > > // REQUIRES: libatomic > // RUN: %build -la

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-08-01 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
jfb updated this revision to Diff 66342. jfb added a comment. - Move atomics.align to libcxx-specific - Give names to anonymous structs - Rename test, use REQUIRES / RUN commands https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073 Files: test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.sh.cpp Index: test/libcxx/ato

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-17 Thread Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
EricWF added a comment. OK, IMO the way to handle this test is to have it manually link `-latomic`. This can be done by renaming the test to `.sh.cpp` and adding the following lines: // REQUIRES: libatomic // RUN: %build -latomic // RUN: %run After that this LGTM. https://reviews.llvm.

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-17 Thread Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
EricWF added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073#482120, @jfb wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073#481402, @EricWF wrote: > > > - The test should be moved to `test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align` since > > it's libc++ specific. > > > Done. > > > - Please give the anonymous struct

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-12 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
jfb added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D22073#481402, @EricWF wrote: > - The test should be moved to `test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align` since it's > libc++ specific. Done. > - Please give the anonymous struct declarations unique names. `T1`, `T2`, > ..., `TN` is fine. Currently the

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-12 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
jfb updated this revision to Diff 63723. jfb added a comment. - Move atomics.align to libcxx-specific - Give names to anonymous structs http://reviews.llvm.org/D22073 Files: test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.cpp Index: test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.cpp =

Re: [PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-11 Thread Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
EricWF added a comment. - The test should be moved to `test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align` since it's libc++ specific. - Please give the anonymous struct declarations unique names. `T1`, `T2`, ..., `TN` is fine. Currently they all mangle to `main::type` in diagnostic output. - The test fails to l

[PATCH] D22073: libc++: test lock-free atomic alignment

2016-07-06 Thread JF Bastien via cfe-commits
jfb created this revision. jfb added a reviewer: cfe-commits. libc++ implements std::atomic<_Tp> using __atomic_base<_Tp> with `mutable _Atomic(_Tp) __a_`. That member must be suitably aligned on relevant ISAs for instructions such as cmpxchg to work properly, but this alignment isn't checked anyw