rmaprath abandoned this revision.
rmaprath added a comment.
Superseded by http://reviews.llvm.org/D20328.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 55967.
rmaprath added a comment.
Re-spun on top of http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
Files:
include/__threading_support
src/algorithm.cpp
src/memory.cpp
src/mutex.cpp
Index: src/mutex.cpp
==
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 55573.
rmaprath added a comment.
Minor re-spin on http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
Files:
include/__threading_support
Index: include/__threading_support
===
--
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 55570.
rmaprath added a comment.
Re-sync with http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
Files:
include/__threading_support
Index: include/__threading_support
===
--- in
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 55503.
rmaprath added a comment.
Updating to syc-up with http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412. Obviously, this patch
needs more work in terms of setting up the testing story (using a pthreads
based implementation of the threading API).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D
bcraig added a comment.
LGTM. You will still need to get approval from one of your original reviewers
though.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 55127.
rmaprath added a comment.
Addressing review comments from @bcraig:
Adjusted according to the changes of http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412. This patch
is now mostly trivial.
There is a small catch in that, this version of the API takes
pointer-to-point
bcraig added a subscriber: bcraig.
bcraig added a comment.
Note: My opinion doesn't count for much as far as community acceptance goes.
I'm fine with the idea. I think there is at least one significant conformance
hurdle that you will need to address though. I also have some commentary on
th
rmaprath added a comment.
I forgot to mention that we will need a similar (although much smaller) porting
layer for `libcxxabi` and `libunwind`, as those too currently have a pthread
dependency.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19415
___
cfe-commits maili
rmaprath created this revision.
rmaprath added reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, theraven, jroelofs.
rmaprath added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added a subscriber: aemerson.
This patch builds on D19412.
The motivation here is to allow toolchain vendors to build a version of
`libcxx` with all
10 matches
Mail list logo