joker.eph added a subscriber: joker.eph.
joker.eph added a comment.
What the build time of clang before and after? (Your goal is to improve build
time right?)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17130
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
ariccio added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17130#349744, @craig.topper wrote:
> What's complex about the SVal constructors?
I arbitrarily figured that classes that are more than twice-derived (is there a
better way to say that) are complex. I don't think there was any
//particularly
ariccio added inline comments.
Comment at:
llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CoreEngine.h:143
@@ -144,3 +142,3 @@
void addAbortedBlock(const ExplodedNode *node, const CFGBlock *block) {
-blocksAborted.push_back(std::make_pair(block, node));
+
ariccio updated the summary for this revision.
ariccio updated this revision to Diff 47603.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17130
Files:
llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporter.h
llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h
llvm/tools/clang
craig.topper added a subscriber: craig.topper.
craig.topper added a comment.
What's complex about the SVal constructors?
Comment at:
llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CoreEngine.h:143
@@ -144,3 +142,3 @@
void addAbortedBlock(const ExplodedNode
ariccio created this revision.
ariccio added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
As discussed in "Code in headers" on llvm-dev, there are lots of headers with
complex code in them. I've moved some complex constructors & destructors to
implementation files, using [[
https://www.chromium.org/developers/co
