thakis closed this revision.
thakis added a comment.
r258128
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
thakis marked an inline comment as done.
thakis added a comment.
Also addressed your comment and added a test for that.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
thakis updated this revision to Diff 44959.
thakis added a comment.
Address review comment.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15866
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
test/Lexer/cxx-features.cpp
test/Preprocessor/e
Thanks for the review!
I tweaked it a bit so that this only warns on function-type macros in
-pedantic mode. That way, the warning can even be used in practice :-)
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Nico Weber wrote:
> thakis updated this revision to Diff 44958.
> thakis added a comment.
>
> For
thakis updated this revision to Diff 44958.
thakis added a comment.
For function-type macros, make the warning only show up with -pedantic
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15866
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp
te
rsmith accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Comment at: lib/Lex/PPExpressions.cpp:104-105
@@ +103,4 @@
+ // #else branch. Emit a warning about this undefined behavior.
+ if (beginLoc.isMacroID())
+PP.Diag(beginLoc, diag::warn_defined_in_m
thakis created this revision.
thakis added a reviewer: rsmith.
thakis added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
As far as I can tell, doing
#define HAVE_FOO_BAR defined(FOO) && defined(BAR)
#if HAVE_FOO
...
#endif
has undefined behavior per [cpp.cond]p4. In practice, it can have different