mclow.lists accepted this revision.
mclow.lists added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Other than the `_NOEXCEPT_OR_FALSE` thing, this LGTM.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
EricWF added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15516#311280, @mclow.lists wrote:
> do we even use `_NOEXCEPT_OR_FALSE` any more?
Doesn't look like it.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
mclow.lists added a comment.
do we even use `_NOEXCEPT_OR_FALSE` any more?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
EricWF updated this revision to Diff 42813.
EricWF added a comment.
Woops. I forgot to turn off `noexcept` support in C++03 mode for GCC.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15516
Files:
include/__config
Index: include/__config
===
--- inc
EricWF created this revision.
EricWF added reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert, jroelofs.
EricWF added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch allows GCC 4.6 and above to use `noexcept` as opposed to `throw()`.
Is it an ABI safe change to suddenly switch on `noexcept`? I imagine it must be
because
