aaron.ballman closed this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
I committed a different fix for this in r319555.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D15406
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
aaron.ballman added a subscriber: aaron.ballman.
aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a reviewer: aaron.ballman.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15406#307733, @rsmith wrote:
> This looks fine to me, though it would be better to express the restricti
rsmith added a subscriber: rsmith.
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a reviewer: rsmith.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This looks fine to me, though it would be better to express the restrictions as
a `SubjectList` on the attribute definition i
comex created this revision.
comex added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
When a function parameter is declared `__attribute__((cleanup))`, neither Clang
nor GCC actually executes the cleanup function, but Clang didn't warn about it.
For the sake of compatibility, add a warning rather than making the
