On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Bataev, Alexey
wrote:
> Guys, talking about implicitly captured variables we have to deal with 2
> locations: 1) point of real capturing (it is the point of '=' or '&'
> symbols in lambda capture-list);
I'm not sure that's "the point of real capturing" if it's
Guys, talking about implicitly captured variables we have to deal with 2
locations: 1) point of real capturing (it is the point of '=' or '&'
symbols in lambda capture-list); 2) a point of first use of variable
inside lambda's body.
When we're talking about diagnostic for implicitly captured var
Yeah. I can't see a difference here being useful, and more likely harmful.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015, 8:48 AM David Blaikie wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bataev, Alexey
> wrote:
>
>> Debug info points to the real place where it is captured, while
>> diagnostics points to the first use of
Debug info points to the real place where it is captured, while
diagnostics points to the first use of implicitly captured variable.
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
=
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team
25.08.2015 18:22, David Blaikie пишет:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Bataev,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bataev, Alexey
wrote:
> Debug info points to the real place where it is captured, while
> diagnostics points to the first use of implicitly captured variable.
Right, but I'm trying to understand the justification for why that's the
right thing to do. Why the deb
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Bataev, Alexey
wrote:
> I though about this. I think it will be more convenient for user to see
> the diagnostic on the first use of the variable rather than on '=' or '&'
> symbol.
>
Why the difference between the diagnostic & the debug info, then?
>
> Best re
I though about this. I think it will be more convenient for user to see
the diagnostic on the first use of the variable rather than on '=' or
'&' symbol.
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
=
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team
25.08.2015 18:07, David Blaikie пишет:
On Tue, Aug 18, 20
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Alexey Bataev via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> ABataev created this revision.
> ABataev added reviewers: echristo, rjmccall, rsmith.
> ABataev added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
>
> When variables are implicitly captured in lambdas, debug info g
ABataev created this revision.
ABataev added reviewers: echristo, rjmccall, rsmith.
ABataev added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
When variables are implicitly captured in lambdas, debug info generated for
captured variables points to location where they are used first. This patch
makes debug info t
