https://github.com/vgvassilev approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/luporl approved this pull request.
LGTM, works on my machine.
Thanks for digging deeper into the cause of the problem.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
mizvekov wrote:
My game plan for merging this PR is to merge all the other PRs into this
branch, collapsing everything into a single PR again.
Then wait for CI to pass, and merge it.
Let me know if you have better ideas.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147835
https://github.com/shafik commented:
I don't think I understand this change. There at least needs to be a more
detailed summary and tests. I imagine test would help clarify the intent better.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121085
___
cfe-co
PiJoules wrote:
@pcc @fmayer How would y'all feel about proceeding with how UBSan handles this
and instead introducing one __has_feature for each of the cfi schemes as
opposed to one global one?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151348
___
cf
@@ -630,6 +654,104 @@ ComplexExprEmitter::emitBinOps(const BinaryOperator *e,
QualType promotionTy) {
return binOpInfo;
}
+LValue ComplexExprEmitter::emitCompoundAssignLValue(
+const CompoundAssignOperator *e,
+mlir::Value (ComplexExprEmitter::*func)(const BinOpInfo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Do it only if we will end up skipping the initializer anyway because it's a
trivial copy or move constructor.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152185.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modi
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152185
Do it only if we will end up skipping the initializer anyway because it's a
trivial copy or move constructor.
>From 293e92d5f2273d7aedcc0567bda17f46e048ae35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3
https://github.com/Patryk27 commented:
It's a very nice catch! I think the code is good (modulo the comments already
left by @benshi001) and it'd be nice to get this merged 🙂
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152028
___
cfe-commits mailing li
@@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ while.end:; preds =
%while.body, %entry
define void @store16predec(ptr %x, i16 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: store16predec:
-; CHECK: st -{{[XYZ]}}, {{.*}}
-; CHECK: st -{{[XYZ]}}, {{.*}}
+; TODO: st -{{[XYZ]}}, {{.*}}
--
https://github.com/Patryk27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152028
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Patryk27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152028
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+//===- AVRTargetTransformInfo.h - AVR specific TTI -*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
I think I'd prefer to split the pointer authentication changes into a separate
patch; I'm not sure I'm comfortable reviewing that bit.
Other changes look fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152076
_
@@ -2294,6 +2294,18 @@ llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitDynamicCast(Address
ThisAddr,
DestRecordTy->getAsCXXRecordDecl()->isEffectivelyFinal() &&
CGM.getCXXABI().shouldEmitExactDynamicCast(DestRecordTy);
+ std::optional ExactCastInfo;
+ if
@@ -1722,41 +1728,95 @@ llvm::Value *ItaniumCXXABI::emitExactDynamicCast(
if (!Offset)
Offset = PathOffset;
else if (Offset != PathOffset) {
- // Base appears in at least two different places. Find the most-derived
- // object and see if it's a DestDecl.
https://github.com/bogner closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Justin Bogner
Date: 2025-08-05T10:47:06-07:00
New Revision: 8a2d3f5653eb8b97049e06a98459a61db397c01c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a2d3f5653eb8b97049e06a98459a61db397c01c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8a2d3f5653eb8b97049e06a98459a61db397c01c.diff
@@ -2064,7 +2069,7 @@ bool Compiler::visitCallArgs(ArrayRef Args,
return false;
}
-if (FuncDecl && NonNullArgs[ArgIndex]) {
+if (HasNonNullAttr && NonNullArgs[ArgIndex]) {
shafik wrote:
Couldn't we just use `!NonNullArgs.empty()` rather th
ShashwathiNavada wrote:
> Independent of your patch, the following seems to crash. Is it supposed to be
> valid? Is there an open bug?
>
> ```
> typedef struct myvec {
> int a;
> double *b;
> } myvec_t;
> void foo() {
> #pragma omp declare mapper(id: myvec_t v) map(iterator(it=0:v.a), t
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/klausler approved this pull request.
Works for me; thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -356,6 +356,8 @@ def err_opt_not_valid_without_opt : Error<
"option '%0' cannot be specified without '%1'">;
def err_opt_not_valid_on_target : Error<
"option '%0' cannot be specified on this target">;
+def err_opt_unsupported_with_sugguest : Error<
toppe
efriedma-quic wrote:
> > We don't currently have a definition of what it means to "use" a value in a
> > way that would cause undefined behavior with poison.
>
> Which means stating it produces undefined behavior less accurate?
We have to document semantics that describe the behavior with all
@@ -271,15 +237,29 @@ static void reportErrors(Module &M, DXILResourceMap &DRM,
if (auto RSD = getRootSignature(RSBI, MMI)) {
-llvm::hlsl::rootsig::RootSignatureBindingValidation Validation =
-initRSBindingValidation(*RSD, tripleToVisibility(MMI.ShaderProfile));
@@ -95,6 +97,8 @@ class BindingInfo {
LLVM_ABI std::optional
findAvailableBinding(dxil::ResourceClass RC, uint32_t Space, int32_t Size);
+ LLVM_ABI bool isBound(dxil::ResourceClass RC, uint32_t Space, BindingRange
B);
joaosaffran wrote:
No, `findAvailab
@@ -36,3 +36,8 @@ void* h(unsigned x) {
// expected-error@+1 {{argument value 1048575 is outside the valid range [0,
65535]}}
return __builtin_frame_address(0xF);
}
+
+void *i() {
+// expected-error@+1 {{too many arguments to function call, expected 0, have
1}}
+return __
moorabbit wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is any expected difference in behavior between
> STACKSAVE and STACKADDRESS
On most targets, the behavior is the same. SPARC is an exception.
`STACKADDRESS` needs to be expanded so it returns the starting address of the
stack region that's available to
https://github.com/hekota closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Helena Kotas
Date: 2025-08-05T10:05:05-07:00
New Revision: 3b2a1a5d9bb071bf210a2b070ee931b1d8e29b9e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b2a1a5d9bb071bf210a2b070ee931b1d8e29b9e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b2a1a5d9bb071bf210a2b070ee931b1d8e29b9e.diff
https://github.com/zGoldthorpe closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: zGoldthorpe
Date: 2025-08-05T11:04:15-06:00
New Revision: d7074b63ed2022e27d3d9c884f0a4922b453b1f7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d7074b63ed2022e27d3d9c884f0a4922b453b1f7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d7074b63ed2022e27d3d9c884f0a4922b453b1f7.diff
L
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2025-08-05T10:02:53-07:00
New Revision: 913c5b4d1fffa00585edb6ba4f0915f29afa90cc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/913c5b4d1fffa00585edb6ba4f0915f29afa90cc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/913c5b4d1fffa00585edb6ba4f0915f29afa90cc.diff
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
ashermancinelli wrote:
Thank you for this! I would love to see a user of the plugin API built by
default, both as extra assurance that the API maintained and to serve as
documentatio
yxsamliu wrote:
ping. any further comments or concerns? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145131
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+//===- tools/plugins-shlib/ReferencePlugin.cpp
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+//===-- Instrumentor.cpp - Highly configurable instrumentation pass
---===//
ashermancinelli wrote:
I like the instrumentor -
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions c,h --
clang/lib/Headers/avxintrin.h clang/test/CodeGen/X86/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152173.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Headers/avxintrin.h (+12-12)
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGe
https://github.com/RKSimon created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152173
None
>From ceee2231765e02a6ce53b545b16db6882c4464ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Pilgrim
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:32:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Headers][X86] Allow AVX _mm256_set* intrinsics to be used
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2025-08-05T09:26:47-07:00
New Revision: 258997c16e4d5438207377d6ce4f9d608860d7ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/258997c16e4d5438207377d6ce4f9d608860d7ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/258997c16e4d5438207377d6ce4f9d608860d7ae.diff
LO
https://github.com/zGoldthorpe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149216
>From c82bff38f45c65d8fbac77bd4ef3369a16b768d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zach Goldthorpe
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:45:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Exposed some AMDGCN raw buffer atomic intrinsics to
c
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From 79849c3ba76ebf66fd7856fa92cd98af56ac49a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remo
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
LGTM, thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -95,6 +97,8 @@ class BindingInfo {
LLVM_ABI std::optional
findAvailableBinding(dxil::ResourceClass RC, uint32_t Space, int32_t Size);
+ LLVM_ABI bool isBound(dxil::ResourceClass RC, uint32_t Space, BindingRange
B);
inbelic wrote:
Isn't this equivalen
@@ -271,15 +237,29 @@ static void reportErrors(Module &M, DXILResourceMap &DRM,
if (auto RSD = getRootSignature(RSBI, MMI)) {
-llvm::hlsl::rootsig::RootSignatureBindingValidation Validation =
-initRSBindingValidation(*RSD, tripleToVisibility(MMI.ShaderProfile));
https://github.com/inbelic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -271,15 +237,29 @@ static void reportErrors(Module &M, DXILResourceMap &DRM,
if (auto RSD = getRootSignature(RSBI, MMI)) {
-llvm::hlsl::rootsig::RootSignatureBindingValidation Validation =
-initRSBindingValidation(*RSD, tripleToVisibility(MMI.ShaderProfile));
https://github.com/inbelic commented:
I also think some unneeded includes crept in. Eg: ``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -624,8 +624,15 @@ namespace {
CallArgList Args;
Args.add(RValue::get(Arg),
CGF.getContext().getPointerType(Var.getType()));
- auto Callee = CGCallee::forDirect(CleanupFn);
- CGF.EmitCall(FnInfo, Callee, ReturnValueSlot(), Args);
+ bo
dakersnar wrote:
Good call, they were not being handled correctly. Taking the `abs` of the
offsets before calling `getLimitedValue` should do the trick as far as I can
reason.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145733
___
cfe-commits mailing l
aadanen wrote:
Nice!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
> `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
> building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/b
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/32123
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152162
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2025-08-05T17:28:49+02:00
New Revision: 6c9f1ce429809e5a91683ed6cef9a435047bebd1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c9f1ce429809e5a91683ed6cef9a435047bebd1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c9f1ce429809e5a91683ed6cef9a435047bebd1.diff
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
@@ -7941,6 +7942,31 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() != 1)
erichkeane wrote:
I'm still a little surprised we
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
+ return true;
+
+// Delay if this is not a function type.
@@ -3643,6 +3643,95 @@ make the function's CFI jump table canonical. See
:ref:`the CFI documentation
}];
}
+def CFISaltDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Heading = "cfi_salt";
+ let Label = "langext-cfi_salt";
+ let Content = [{
+The ``cfi_sal
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fsanitize=kcfi -verify %s
+
+#define __cfi_salt(S) __attribute__((cfi_salt(S)))
+
+int bad1() __cfi_salt(); // expected-error{{'cfi_salt' attribute takes one
argument}}
+int bad2() __cfi_salt(42); // expected-error{{expected str
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
CStringChecker had an AdditionOverflow bug type which was intended for a
situation where the analyzer concludes that the addition of two size/length
values overflows `size_t`.
I strongly suspect that the an
steakhal wrote:
This should fix the test failure introduced by #151908
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152162
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
CStringChecker had an AdditionOverflow bug type which was intended for a
situation where the analyzer concludes that the addition of two size/length
values overflows `size_t`.
I strongly s
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
This should fix the bots like:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/10899/steps/7/logs/FAIL__Clang__cxx23-assume-attribute_cpp
```
TEST 'Clang :: Analysi
https://github.com/NagyDonat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152163
CStringChecker had an AdditionOverflow bug type which was intended for a
situation where the analyzer concludes that the addition of two size/length
values overflows `size_t`.
I strongly suspect that the ana
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152162
This should fix the bots like:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/10899/steps/7/logs/FAIL__Clang__cxx23-assume-attribute_cpp
```
TEST 'Clang :: Analysis/cxx23-assume-attribu
https://github.com/zGoldthorpe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149216
>From c82bff38f45c65d8fbac77bd4ef3369a16b768d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zach Goldthorpe
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:45:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Exposed some AMDGCN raw buffer atomic intrinsics to
c
https://github.com/zGoldthorpe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149216
>From c82bff38f45c65d8fbac77bd4ef3369a16b768d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zach Goldthorpe
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:45:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Exposed some AMDGCN raw buffer atomic intrinsics to
c
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2025-08-05T08:25:34-07:00
New Revision: 74af2cec7bbd307d1dcb7f9f3cdf339d551a1f9f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74af2cec7bbd307d1dcb7f9f3cdf339d551a1f9f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74af2cec7bbd307d1dcb7f9f3cdf339d551a1f9f.diff
LO
https://github.com/steakhal commented:
I don't think I have much to say here. Maybe, thank you :)
I'm not too interested reviewing this. I scrolled through and in that 2 minutes
I didn't spot any issues. Do a review and merge it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152138
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152138
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -25,25 +25,39 @@ namespace ento {
namespace retaincountchecker {
class RefCountBug : public BugType {
+ StringRef ReportMessage;
+
public:
- enum RefCountBugKind {
-UseAfterRelease,
-ReleaseNotOwned,
-DeallocNotOwned,
-FreeNotOwned,
-OverAutorelease,
bolshakov-a wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152137
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -175,9 +175,12 @@ class CheckerDocumentation
/// \param Loc The value of the location (pointer).
/// \param Val The value which will be stored at the location Loc.
/// \param S The bind is performed while processing the statement S.
+ /// \param atDeclInit Whether t
https://github.com/steakhal commented:
We use UpperCamelCase style for variable names, including parameter names.
Have you checked if any of the checkBind users used an `isa` or `dyncast` as a
proxy to determine if its an assignment expression or an initialization?
I suspect there could have be
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2025-08-05T17:03:53+02:00
New Revision: 0a1eff2ecedcb11acb3e9d4b75ee1e1bebd69a70
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a1eff2ecedcb11acb3e9d4b75ee1e1bebd69a70
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a1eff2ecedcb11acb3e9d4b75ee1e1bebd69a70.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151908
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-08-05T07:39:21-07:00
New Revision: 2e0ddbb5cd5b4c860cba6197b6977b96b9dde881
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e0ddbb5cd5b4c860cba6197b6977b96b9dde881
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e0ddbb5cd5b4c860cba6197b6977b96b9dde881.diff
L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
This patch upstreams CIRGen and LLVM lowering support for the
`__builtin_assume_aligned` builtin function.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152152.diff
9 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/Lancern created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152152
This patch upstreams CIRGen and LLVM lowering support for the
`__builtin_assume_aligned` builtin function.
>From 46e1300ba7f0c2168a2157facf51834ed6549d00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirui Mu
Date: Tue, 5 Au
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#152149
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152088
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
/cherry-pick 30a5d56
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148583
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj
Date: 2025-08-05T20:02:44+05:30
New Revision: 1d594fdb8d0d210893ae346bb6869343dd7a1949
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d594fdb8d0d210893ae346bb6869343dd7a1949
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d594fdb8d0d210893ae346bb6869343dd7a1949
https://github.com/zahiraam approved this pull request.
Looks good. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148583
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152044
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 159771 matches
Mail list logo
