phillip.power added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305#268795, @xazax.hun wrote:
> > How close is "the near future"? I would like to start using the hashing
> > feature in the next couple of weeks. If your checker identification
> > improvements are a long time out, I would like you
phillip.power added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305#262534, @xazax.hun wrote:
> - Should we require the generation of old hashes once a change is introduced,
> or should we expect users who rely on old hash to maintain the old hash
> generation as an out of tree patch?
I will lik
phillip.power added a comment.
Hi Babati,
We at Sony are interested in this feature so that our tools can suppress
undesirable bug warnings. You described at the end of the summary that you have
thought about introducing new hash calculation algorithms if needed. How do
you expect this to wor
