@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+==
+Adoption Guide for ``-fbounds-safety``
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+Where to get ``-fbounds-safety``
+
+
+The open sourcing to llvm.org's ``llvm-pro
https://github.com/delcypher requested changes to this pull request.
Seems reasonable and something we can expand on. The main issue is the fact
`-fbounds-safety` is a cc1 option while this doc is written assuming its a
driver option.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120674
__
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120674
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
[This
comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321/files#r1906005324) is
not showing up in the conversation view for some reason.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
delcypher wrote:
@erichkeane @AaronBallman @Sirraide I've addressed everything I can.
I seem to be running into a problem where some of my replies to comments are
not showing up in the conversation tab. This seems to be a [known problem with
GitHub reviews
](https://github.com/orgs/community
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes -fsyntax-only -verify
%s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+//
=
@@ -19,13 +19,12 @@ struct on_member_pointer_complete_ty {
};
struct on_member_pointer_incomplete_ty {
- struct size_unknown * buf __counted_by(count); //
expected-error{{'counted_by' cannot be applied to a pointer with pointee of
unknown size because 'struct size_unknown'
@@ -8207,6 +8207,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+// Note the return value isn't used to return early
+// to pres
@@ -3907,6 +3923,31 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::getAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
+// TODO: This method isn't really ideal because it doesn't return the spelling
+// of the attri
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -3907,6 +3923,31 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::getAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
+// TODO: This method isn't really ideal because it doesn't return the spelling
+// of the attri
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
@Sirraide Thanks for your review and sorry for the delay in getting back to
this. I've tried to address as much as possible and left comment on things that
still need discussion. Please take a look when time permits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes -fsyntax-only -verify
%s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+//
=
https://github.com/delcypher deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13559,6 +13562,27 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAssignmentOperands(Expr *LHSExpr,
ExprResult &RHS,
QualType LHSType = LHSExpr->getType();
QualType RHSType = CompoundType.isNull() ? RHS.get()->getType() :
CompoundType;
+
+ if (RHS.
@@ -19,13 +19,12 @@ struct on_member_pointer_complete_ty {
};
struct on_member_pointer_incomplete_ty {
- struct size_unknown * buf __counted_by(count); //
expected-error{{'counted_by' cannot be applied to a pointer with pointee of
unknown size because 'struct size_unknown'
@@ -13559,6 +13562,27 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAssignmentOperands(Expr *LHSExpr,
ExprResult &RHS,
QualType LHSType = LHSExpr->getType();
QualType RHSType = CompoundType.isNull() ? RHS.get()->getType() :
CompoundType;
+
+ if (RHS.
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -186,4 +218,206 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+static void EmitIncompleteCountedByPointeeNotes(Sema &S,
+const CountAttributedType
*CATy,
+
@@ -102,7 +105,36 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
// only `PointeeTy->isStructureTypeWithFlexibleArrayMember()` is reachable
// when `FieldTy->isArrayType()`.
bool ShouldWarn = false;
- if (PointeeTy->isIncompleteType()
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -3907,6 +3923,31 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::getAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
+// TODO: This method isn't really ideal because it doesn't return the spelling
@@ -3907,6 +3923,31 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::getAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
+// TODO: This method isn't really ideal because it doesn't return the spelling
+// of the attri
@@ -2068,13 +2068,55 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E, bool CountInBytes,
bool OrNull);
+ /// Perform Bounds Safety Semantic checks for assigning to a `__counted_by`
or
+ /// `__
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -8238,6 +8246,15 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
}
}
+ // Note the return value isn't used to return early so that additional
+ // diagnostics can be emitted and to preserve the AST as best as possible
+ // even though an
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+// Note the return value isn't used to return early
+// to pres
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes -fsyntax-only -verify
%s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+//
=
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes -fsyntax-only -verify
%s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+//
=
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-late-parse-attributes -fsyntax-only -verify
%s
+
+#define __counted_by(f) __attribute__((counted_by(f)))
+
+//
=
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8207,6 +8207,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+// Note the return value isn't used to return early
+// to pres
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -186,4 +218,216 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // This is an approximation that's not quite right. This points to the
+
@@ -2440,6 +2440,26 @@ class alignas(TypeAlignment) Type : public
ExtQualsTypeCommonBase {
return !isFunctionType();
}
+ /// \returns True if the type is incomplete and it is also a type that
+ /// cannot be completed by a later type definition.
+ ///
+ /// E.g. For
@@ -8238,6 +8246,15 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
}
}
+ // Note the return value isn't used to return early so that additional
+ // diagnostics can be emitted and to preserve the AST as best as possible
+ // even though an
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // Note: This implementation relies on `CountAttributedType` being uniqu
@@ -2438,6 +2438,22 @@ bool Type::isIncompleteType(NamedDecl **Def) const {
}
}
+bool Type::isIncompletableIncompleteType() const {
+ if (!isIncompleteType())
+return false;
+
+ // Forward declarations of structs, classes, enums, and unions could be later
+ // complet
@@ -3343,6 +3363,8 @@ class CountAttributedType final
static bool classof(const Type *T) {
return T->getTypeClass() == CountAttributed;
}
+
+ StringRef GetAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const;
delcypher wrote:
I filed #113585 to track fixing this
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // Note: This implementation relies on `CountAttributedType` being uniqu
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
delcypher wrote:
I've dropped the hacky implementation in
@@ -13559,6 +13562,27 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAssignmentOperands(Expr *LHSExpr,
ExprResult &RHS,
QualType LHSType = LHSExpr->getType();
QualType RHSType = CompoundType.isNull() ? RHS.get()->getType() :
CompoundType;
+
+ if (RHS.
delcypher wrote:
@Sirraide @erichkeane Sorry for the delay in addressing your feedback. This PR
is ready for another round of reviews. Note I'm aware there are some code
formatting problems. I'll fix them when I squash locally. I've tried to keep
all my tweaks as separate commits so it's easi
@@ -3862,6 +3878,27 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::GetAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
delcypher wrote:
I've filed #113585 to track fixing the properly. I don't thin
@@ -13559,6 +13562,27 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAssignmentOperands(Expr *LHSExpr,
ExprResult &RHS,
QualType LHSType = LHSExpr->getType();
QualType RHSType = CompoundType.isNull() ? RHS.get()->getType() :
CompoundType;
+
+ if (RHS.
@@ -5080,6 +5083,17 @@ void Parser::ParseLexedCAttribute(LateParsedAttribute
&LA, bool EnterScope,
ParseGNUAttributeArgs(&LA.AttrName, LA.AttrNameLoc, Attrs, nullptr, nullptr,
SourceLocation(), ParsedAttr::Form::GNU(), nullptr);
+ const auto &SM = P
@@ -5080,6 +5083,17 @@ void Parser::ParseLexedCAttribute(LateParsedAttribute
&LA, bool EnterScope,
ParseGNUAttributeArgs(&LA.AttrName, LA.AttrNameLoc, Attrs, nullptr, nullptr,
SourceLocation(), ParsedAttr::Form::GNU(), nullptr);
+ const auto &SM = P
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -I%S/Inputs -Wthread-safety %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -I%S/Inputs -Wthread-safety -std=c++98 %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -I%S/Inputs -Wthread-safety -std=c++11 %s -D
C
https://github.com/delcypher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
>From 5497f530a717ff302deb85fc30ff75e59dba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:48:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][Sema] Move Sema::AssignmentAction into its own scoped
enum
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
>From 54a5f90ce219aad942074d78d986d24d6690b30c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:44:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [NFC][Sema] Move `Sema::AssignmentAction` into its own
scoped
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
>From 54a5f90ce219aad942074d78d986d24d6690b30c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:44:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC][Sema] Move `Sema::AssignmentAction` into its own
scoped
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
>From 54a5f90ce219aad942074d78d986d24d6690b30c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:44:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [NFC][Sema] Move `Sema::AssignmentAction` into its own
scoped
delcypher wrote:
@Endilll I've tried to address your feedback.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
>From 54a5f90ce219aad942074d78d986d24d6690b30c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:44:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [NFC][Sema] Move `Sema::AssignmentAction` into its own
scoped
delcypher wrote:
@Endilll This is my attempt at implementing what you asked for in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321#discussion_r1734379624
I'm not a huge fan of this as I think this will be extremely annoying for
downstream forks with very little upside vs just moving the unsco
@@ -2099,6 +2099,70 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E, bool CountInBytes,
bool OrNull);
+ // AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+ // to repr
https://github.com/delcypher created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106453
The primary motivation behind this is to allow the enum type to be
referred to earlier in the `Sema.h` file which is needed for #106321.
It was requested in #106321 that a scoped enum be used (rather than
movi
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+// Note the return value isn't used to return early
+// to pres
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
delcypher wrote:
Yeah this isn't great. The whole functio
@@ -3862,6 +3878,27 @@ CountAttributedType::CountAttributedType(
DeclSlot[i] = CoupledDecls[i];
}
+StringRef CountAttributedType::GetAttributeName(bool WithMacroPrefix) const {
delcypher wrote:
> but the way this works for AttributedTypes is that the Att
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // Note: This implementation relies on `CountAttributedType` being uniqu
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+// Note the return value isn't used to return early
+// to pres
@@ -186,4 +218,370 @@ bool Sema::CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr
*E, bool CountInBytes,
return false;
}
+SourceRange Sema::BoundsSafetySourceRangeFor(const CountAttributedType *CATy) {
+ // Note: This implementation relies on `CountAttributedType` being uniqu
@@ -2438,6 +2438,22 @@ bool Type::isIncompleteType(NamedDecl **Def) const {
}
}
+bool Type::isIncompletableIncompleteType() const {
+ if (!isIncompleteType())
+return false;
+
+ // Forward declarations of structs, classes, enums, and unions could be later
+ // complet
@@ -2438,6 +2438,22 @@ bool Type::isIncompleteType(NamedDecl **Def) const {
}
}
+bool Type::isIncompletableIncompleteType() const {
+ if (!isIncompleteType())
+return false;
+
+ // Forward declarations of structs, classes, enums, and unions could be later
+ // complet
@@ -2440,6 +2440,26 @@ class alignas(TypeAlignment) Type : public
ExtQualsTypeCommonBase {
return !isFunctionType();
}
+ /// \returns True if the type is incomplete and it is also a type that
+ /// cannot be completed by a later type definition.
+ ///
+ /// E.g. For
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2099,6 +2099,70 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
bool CheckCountedByAttrOnField(FieldDecl *FD, Expr *E, bool CountInBytes,
bool OrNull);
+ // AssignmentAction - This is used by all the assignment diagnostic functions
+ // to repr
delcypher wrote:
@bwendling @kees Apologies for taking so long to get this change upstream. We
spent quite a lot of time experimenting with different implementations that
ended up not working out. Our internal version of this patch is larger because
`counted_by` is allowed in many more context
https://github.com/delcypher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
@AaronBallman Thanks for the feedback. I've tried to make your suggested
changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102236
>From b5ce9c1f8de1deb90b9473ab26cd25c5111f7b42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:38:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Bounds Safety][NFC] Add some missing coverage for
`-fexperimen
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102236
>From 885d40de074514cf349423e7ae387ccdf6dfbbc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:38:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Bounds Safety][NFC] Add some missing coverage for
`-fexperimen
@@ -80,10 +81,17 @@ struct found_outside_of_struct {
struct bar ** ptr __counted_by_or_null(global); // expected-error {{field
'global' in 'counted_by_or_null' not inside structure}}
};
+#ifndef LATE_PARSING_ENABLED
struct self_referrential {
int bork;
struct bar *se
https://github.com/delcypher created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102236
Previously we weren't properly checking that using
`-fexperimental-late-parse-attributes` worked on source code that didn't need
late parsing.
For example we weren't testing that the attribute appearing in t
delcypher wrote:
@Xazax-hun This is something I'd like too. Unfortunately in previous
discussions we were asked to not do this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70480#discussion_r1379166020
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70480#discussion_r1377966526
As the number of tests gr
https://github.com/delcypher approved this pull request.
LGTM. Please fix the commit message when squashing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/delcypher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
Rebased due to the conflict caused by landing #92623
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99330
>From 951a2a3bdf2857e789cf484caf9c27633a715cc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:53:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Bounds Safety][NFC] Move Bounds Safety Sema code to
`SemaBoundsSaf
delcypher wrote:
@AaronBallman Thanks for approving. I've rebased this patch and tweaked the
commit message to give the context for this change. Landing now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92623
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92623
>From 4af270878cb243832f5aeb47c785efa263ba8c78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:15:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Bounds Safety] Add `-fexperimental-bounds-safety` CC1 and
language
delcypher wrote:
@AaronBallman @Endilll Thanks for approving. I'll wait a bit for some of the
code owners to chime in before landing this.
@rapidsna @hnrklssn @bwendling @kees Please let me know if you have any
concerns about this refactor.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99330
https://github.com/delcypher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
Thanks all for the clarification. Closing this PR in favor of #99330
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99330
This patch adds a new `SemaBoundsSafety.cpp` source file and moves the existing
`CheckCountedByAttrOnField` function and related helper functions and types
from `SemaDeclAttr.cpp` into the new source file. The
delcypher wrote:
> The separations we've been making so far in Sema have been at a higher level
> of granularity than this proposal. Vlad was calling it "language extensions"
> but perhaps a different way to phrase it would be "unique language dialects".
> e.g., Objective-C is its own language
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo