https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang-tools-extra` at
step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/20287
Here is the
https://github.com/SimplyDanny closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Danny Mösch
Date: 2025-07-28T07:37:16+02:00
New Revision: 0afb30311d2858af4134d55af927ba0266b8e505
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0afb30311d2858af4134d55af927ba0266b8e505
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0afb30311d2858af4134d55af927ba0266b8e505.diff
L
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-28T13:08:07+08:00
New Revision: 2e71bf01330d986c28dec47a7f8506021028450f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e71bf01330d986c28dec47a7f8506021028450f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2e71bf01330d986c28dec47a7f8506021028450f.diff
LOG:
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-28T13:08:07+08:00
New Revision: ee3cf1252a0763e56c28592edec96b029c884bba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee3cf1252a0763e56c28592edec96b029c884bba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee3cf1252a0763e56c28592edec96b029c884bba.diff
LOG:
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-28T13:08:07+08:00
New Revision: 8c8b3cd28b52a98383b6875d045bdf1f4d9a3a2f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c8b3cd28b52a98383b6875d045bdf1f4d9a3a2f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c8b3cd28b52a98383b6875d045bdf1f4d9a3a2f.diff
LOG:
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-28T13:08:07+08:00
New Revision: 024262421dc7f1900a28b3a4a5d4380925fd96b8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/024262421dc7f1900a28b3a4a5d4380925fd96b8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/024262421dc7f1900a28b3a4a5d4380925fd96b8.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/illusory0x0 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139093
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
>From 7418fe966ff3a3e9f3c6c431beafbdde47a1de30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 01:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment:
true`
This
zwuis wrote:
> Then what is the benefits?
Adding `__builtin_lambda_this()` is prerequisite of fixing the issue which this
PR tries to fix, because we cannot access the caller of lambda `operator()`
without adding compiler magic such as builtin functions.
> Whatever it is, I feel this can/shou
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > Would you like to give a brief introduction for your design. I didn't
> > figure it out.
>
> * The function signature of `__builtin_lambda_this()` is `void*()`.
> * Sema part: if it is a non-staic lambda expression (similar with this PR),
> create an expression `static_ca
zwuis wrote:
> Would you like to give a brief introduction for your design. I didn't figure
> it out.
- The function signature of `__builtin_lambda_this()` is `void*()`.
- Sema part: if it is a non-staic lambda expression (similar with this PR),
create an expression `static_cast(__builtin_lamb
halbi2 wrote:
@Sirraide will you merge this for me please?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142541
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/halbi2 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142541
>From c683b2aa84cba1b7057592e50c542cd5645adde5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: halbi2
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 15:35:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] [test] More coverage of [[nodiscard]]
---
clang/test/SemaC
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2025-07-28T09:58:38+08:00
New Revision: 1b4db78d2eaa070b3f364a2d2b2b826a5439b892
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b4db78d2eaa070b3f364a2d2b2b826a5439b892
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b4db78d2eaa070b3f364a2d2b2b826a5439b892.diff
LO
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Hi. I tried to fix this issue locally by adding a function
> `__builtin_lambda_this()` and it seems to work. I can create PR if you think
> this is a good approach. And I have some questions:
>
> 1. Should this builtin function handle lambda expression only? What about
> `
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Thank you all for the reviews. I don’t have commit access, so I’ll need
> someone to merge this for me eventually. I’ll be away for the next week and
> won’t be able to respond to any regressions or follow-ups during that time.
>
> If you’re comfortable merging it as is, pl
https://github.com/tclin914 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-28T09:31:37+08:00
New Revision: 45104662c086b4e194a23c63760096dd11edd935
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/45104662c086b4e194a23c63760096dd11edd935
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/45104662c086b4e194a23c63760096dd11edd935.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Anchu Rajendran S (anchuraj)
Changes
Atomic Control Options are used to specify architectural characteristics to
help lowering of atomic operations. The options used are:
`-f[no-]atomic-remote-memory`, `-f[no-]atomic-fine-grained-memory`,
https://github.com/anchuraj created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150860
Atomic Control Options are used to specify architectural characteristics to
help lowering of atomic operations. The options used are:
`-f[no-]atomic-remote-memory`, `-f[no-]atomic-fine-grained-memory`,
`-f[no
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Aaron Puchert (aaronpuchert)
Changes
The point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple
times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability
on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-neg
https://github.com/aaronpuchert created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150857
The point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple
times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability
on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-negative.
Howev
https://github.com/joker-eph approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -241,7 +242,21 @@ CapabilityExpr SExprBuilder::translateAttrExpr(const Expr
*AttrExp,
return CapabilityExpr(E, AttrExp->getType(), Neg);
}
-til::LiteralPtr *SExprBuilder::createVariable(const VarDecl *VD) {
+til::SExpr *SExprBuilder::translateVarDecl(const VarDecl *VD,
+
https://github.com/aaronpuchert commented:
Sorry for the delay, but I still need to wrap my head around this. For now just
some very high-level comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
@@ -1012,6 +1030,107 @@ void SExprBuilder::exitCFG(const CFGBlock *Last) {
IncompleteArgs.clear();
}
+bool SExprBuilder::isVariableReassigned(const VarDecl *VD) {
+ // Note: The search is performed lazily per-variable and result is cached. An
+ // alternative would have be
https://github.com/aaronpuchert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tcottin wrote:
Yes, as I wrote, this is the expected output for this PR.
Before rebasing the next patch I would like to get this PR reviewed.
If there is something bigger we need to change, I think it is easier to first
change it for this PR only and then rebase the last patch.
https://github.
aaronpuchert wrote:
> Overall compilation before the change takes 327,801,317 instructions, and
> 327,433,878 after the change
Accidentally left assertions on. Without it's 277,111,134 versus 276,855,186,
but this is also 0.1%, and Thread Safety Analysis is still roughly 1% of the
overall com
mccakit wrote:
Yeah, that changed the output though I'm still seeing this
```
/**
* @brief Adds two numbers
* @param a First number
* @param b Second number
* @return The sum
*/
int add(int a, int b);
->
```
/**
function add
→ int
Parameters:
int a - First number
int b - Second
tcottin wrote:
> Hey, I merged this PR into main and build it, but doxygen comments don't
> work. Am I supposed to tweak something in my .clangd config? Or do you intend
> on enabling doxygen hower on the third patch?
Yes, you need to enable this in your `.clangd` config:
```yaml
Documentatio
https://github.com/Hardcode84 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ivan Butygin (Hardcode84)
Changes
`InitAll***` functions are used by `opt`-style tools to init all MLIR
dialects/passes/extensions. Currently they are implemeted as inline functions
and include essentially t
https://github.com/Hardcode84 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -20,3 +20,18 @@ add_subdirectory(Target)
add_subdirectory(Tools)
add_subdirectory(Transforms)
add_subdirectory(ExecutionEngine)
+
+get_property(dialect_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_DIALECT_LIBS)
+get_property(conversion_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_CONVERSION_LIBS)
+get_property(e
https://github.com/Hardcode84 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
>From 746c0d5891721b7be7f28cd9c9d35a89a941d741 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Butygin
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 00:39:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][core] Move `InitAll***` implementation into static
mccakit wrote:
Hey, I merged this PR into main and build it, but doxygen comments don't work.
Am I supposed to tweak something in my .clangd config?
Or do you intend on enabling doxygen hower on the third patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150790
___
aaronpuchert wrote:
> Does this have measurable performance impacts? Or was there some other
> benefit driving the change?
Thread Safety Analysis is not very expensive overall. I just benchmarked
compilation of `clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp` and it
comes out at around 1%
https://github.com/vbvictor approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaronpuchert wrote:
@rupprecht, maybe you want to try this out?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaronpuchert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SimplyDanny updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
From b9e0047f9f504352d855538568c14eb6e14e5e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Danny=20M=C3=B6sch?=
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 18:47:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Add handling of type aliases in
https://github.com/aaronpuchert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148551
>From b6bd8b5da8007b28469011989171cd050ba60113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Puchert
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 23:48:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Thread Safety Analysis: Compare values of literals
The typ
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -20,3 +20,18 @@ add_subdirectory(Target)
add_subdirectory(Tools)
add_subdirectory(Transforms)
add_subdirectory(ExecutionEngine)
+
+get_property(dialect_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_DIALECT_LIBS)
+get_property(conversion_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_CONVERSION_LIBS)
+get_property(e
@@ -941,43 +966,68 @@ class LockableFactEntry : public FactEntry {
}
};
-class ScopedLockableFactEntry : public FactEntry {
+enum UnderlyingCapabilityKind {
+ UCK_Acquired, ///< Any kind of acquired capability.
+ UCK_ReleasedShared,///< Shared capability that
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
https://github.com/owenca edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
@@ -224,3 +224,22 @@ std::array a{1,2,3};
std::array b{10, 11};
using array = std::array;
array c{10, 11};
+
vbvictor wrote:
I think this still needs case like `S18 s183{.a=1, .b=2} // no warning at all`
Probably good to have one nested like
```cpp
struct S20
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
https://github.com/SimplyDanny edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SimplyDanny edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -224,3 +224,22 @@ std::array a{1,2,3};
std::array b{10, 11};
using array = std::array;
array c{10, 11};
+
SimplyDanny wrote:
Done. Can you think of even more test cases?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
_
@@ -224,3 +224,22 @@ std::array a{1,2,3};
std::array b{10, 11};
using array = std::array;
array c{10, 11};
+
+struct S16 {
+int a;
+int b;
+};
+
+using S17 = S16;
+
+S17 s171{1, 2};
SimplyDanny wrote:
There are. It's just that the test infrastructure d
https://github.com/SimplyDanny updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
From d209f10977e816769065476ad1d9e517bd224431 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Danny=20M=C3=B6sch?=
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 18:47:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Add handling of type aliases in
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
@@ -224,3 +224,22 @@ std::array a{1,2,3};
std::array b{10, 11};
using array = std::array;
array c{10, 11};
+
+struct S16 {
+int a;
+int b;
+};
+
+using S17 = S16;
+
+S17 s171{1, 2};
vbvictor wrote:
Just to double check, there are no fix-its for aliases
@@ -224,3 +224,22 @@ std::array a{1,2,3};
std::array b{10, 11};
using array = std::array;
array c{10, 11};
+
vbvictor wrote:
Please add tests with:
- alias with all fields using designated-init
- alias with some field using designated-init
https://github.com
https://github.com/vbvictor commented:
Please add release notes and check name in PR title like "Add handling of type
aliases in use-designated-initializers"
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lis
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Danny Mösch (SimplyDanny)
Changes
Resolves #150782.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseDesignatedInitializersCheck.c
https://github.com/SimplyDanny created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150842
Resolves #150782.
From ddd53a7ef58db084fe36212f486be2c19f24b8e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Danny=20M=C3=B6sch?=
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 18:47:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Take type al
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds support for mul op for ComplexType
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141365
---
Patch is 39.94 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amr Hesham (AmrDeveloper)
Changes
This change adds support for mul op for ComplexType
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141365
---
Patch is 39.94 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150834
This change adds support for mul op for ComplexType
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141365
>From 59063f1e4e73eb0c4dfe6d74393ed496c2c3e7be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Sun,
moorabbit wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
// parsing and preprocessor state will not have that case.
// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*-(ps4|ps5)}}
//
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -check-suffix=WITH-ANNEX-K%s
bugprone-unsafe-functions %t -- -- -D__STDC_LIB_EXT1__=1
-D__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__=1
-//
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-magic-numbers %t --
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c23-or-later %s readability-magic-numbers %t
// Don't crash
_BitInt(128) A = 4533629751480627964421wb;
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: warning
vbvictor wrote:
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
// parsing and preprocessor state will not have that case.
// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*-(ps4|ps5)}}
//
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -check-suffix=WITH-ANNEX-K%s
bugprone-unsafe-functions %t -- -- -D__STDC_LIB_EXT1__=1
-D__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__=1
-//
https://github.com/keinflue edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150829
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (keinflue)
Changes
HandleMemberPointerAccess considered whether the lvalue path in a member
pointer access matched the bases of the containing class of the member, but
neglected to check the same for the containing class of the membe
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/keinflue created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150829
HandleMemberPointerAccess considered whether the lvalue path in a member
pointer access matched the bases of the containing class of the member, but
neglected to check the same for the containing class of the
@@ -19,13 +18,16 @@ void notRelated(int A, int B) {}
int addedTogether(int A, int B) { return add(A, B); } // NO-WARN: Passed to
same function.
+// FIXME: This triggers a false positive: the "passed to same function"
heuristic
+// can't map the parameter index 1 to A and B
@@ -19,13 +18,16 @@ void notRelated(int A, int B) {}
int addedTogether(int A, int B) { return add(A, B); } // NO-WARN: Passed to
same function.
+// FIXME: This triggers a false positive: the "passed to same function"
heuristic
+// can't map the parameter index 1 to A and B
@@ -374,15 +373,25 @@ def parse_arguments() -> Tuple[argparse.Namespace,
List[str]]:
parser.add_argument(
"-std",
type=csv,
-default=["c++11-or-later"],
+default=None,
help="Passed to clang. Special -or-later values are expanded.",
zwuis wrote:
Hi. I tried to fix this issue locally by adding a function
`__builtin_lambda_this()` and it seems to work. I can create PR if you think
this is a good approach. And I have some questions:
1. Should this builtin function handle lambda expression only? What about
`__builtin_member_
HerrCai0907 wrote:
Does it fix #150276 also?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149694
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149694
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-b-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/20474
Here is the relevant
https://github.com/Lancern closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sirui Mu
Date: 2025-07-27T19:30:37+08:00
New Revision: e2b4ba04140ecbd2367247334b04490ef9537c7a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e2b4ba04140ecbd2367247334b04490ef9537c7a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e2b4ba04140ecbd2367247334b04490ef9537c7a.diff
LOG:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/13344
Here is the relevant piece
@@ -2639,32 +2639,42 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int countVariableAlignments(const SmallVectorImpl &Lines) {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
+
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- fo
https://github.com/localspook edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hip-vega20` running
on `hip-vega20-0` while building `clang` at step 3 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/24161
Here is the relevant piece of the build log fo
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
>From 7418fe966ff3a3e9f3c6c431beafbdde47a1de30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 01:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment:
true`
This
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-07-27T11:54:38+02:00
New Revision: cf1abe67b9c6881527e42c1f6571665bb506b708
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf1abe67b9c6881527e42c1f6571665bb506b708
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf1abe67b9c6881527e42c1f6571665bb506b708.diff
LO
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
>From 7418fe966ff3a3e9f3c6c431beafbdde47a1de30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 01:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment:
true`
This
https://github.com/Hardcode84 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Hardcode84 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
>From 7418fe966ff3a3e9f3c6c431beafbdde47a1de30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 01:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment:
true`
This
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
>From 7418fe966ff3a3e9f3c6c431beafbdde47a1de30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 01:56:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment:
true`
This
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
