https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128274
>From 2110f92892dd72dfbe1a7d87116faa3693c7c586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 03:08:24 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] workflows/release-binaries: Enable Windows x86 builds
---
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128274
>From 2110f92892dd72dfbe1a7d87116faa3693c7c586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 03:08:24 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] workflows/release-binaries: Enable Windows x86 builds
---
@@ -374,15 +373,25 @@ def parse_arguments() -> Tuple[argparse.Namespace,
List[str]]:
parser.add_argument(
"-std",
type=csv,
-default=["c++11-or-later"],
+default=None,
help="Passed to clang. Special -or-later values are expanded.",
https://github.com/localspook edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/localspook edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-non-const-parameter %t
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c99,c11,c17 %s readability-non-const-parameter
%t
localspook wrote:
The single test case in this file is a K&R-style function, so I don't think
ther
@@ -19,13 +18,16 @@ void notRelated(int A, int B) {}
int addedTogether(int A, int B) { return add(A, B); } // NO-WARN: Passed to
same function.
+// FIXME: This triggers a false positive: the "passed to same function"
heuristic
+// can't map the parameter index 1 to A and B
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
// parsing and preprocessor state will not have that case.
// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*-(ps4|ps5)}}
//
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -check-suffix=WITH-ANNEX-K%s
bugprone-unsafe-functions %t -- -- -D__STDC_LIB_EXT1__=1
-D__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__=1
-//
@@ -374,15 +373,25 @@ def parse_arguments() -> Tuple[argparse.Namespace,
List[str]]:
parser.add_argument(
"-std",
type=csv,
-default=["c++11-or-later"],
+default=None,
help="Passed to clang. Special -or-later values are expanded.",
https://github.com/localspook updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
>From 20eb165f1abd9bf7976a2c401579a1284258e13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Chernyakin
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:52:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Stop ignoring `-std` argument in
`check
whitequark wrote:
Now that WASI SDK has `` support in `wasm32-wasip1` (the single-threaded
target) it is time to revisit the PR, as I believe all other changes do not
require upstream WASI SDK work.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92677
___
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150814
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yanzuo Liu (zwuis)
Changes
Add missing `ActOnFinishFullExpr` to `BuildCXXAssumeExpr`. We did it during
template instantiation but forgot non-template case.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150814.diff
5 Files Aff
https://github.com/zwuis created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150814
Add missing `ActOnFinishFullExpr` to `BuildCXXAssumeExpr`. We did it during
template instantiation but forgot non-template case.
>From 28d6be07b613662c5a0d9491c67cf880eb42eadc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yanzu
https://github.com/whitequark updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92677
>From 44c7dadc811107e59e1e47c270230354c4fe7db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catherine
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 04:41:27 +
Subject: [PATCH] Conditionalize use of POSIX features missing on
WASI/WebAssembly.
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2025-07-27T10:11:06+08:00
New Revision: 59fdd97fe6d4e84d653cd005cddb50c1f2eedcb7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59fdd97fe6d4e84d653cd005cddb50c1f2eedcb7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59fdd97fe6d4e84d653cd005cddb50c1f2eedcb7.diff
https://github.com/vtjnash edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150808
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vtjnash created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150808
When code has the pattern of an alloca written only by memcpy followed by just
reads of that result, we can remove the memcpy if we can show it legal to just
forward the users to the source directly. This is a
https://github.com/Hardcode84 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150805
`InitAll***` functions are used by `opt`-style tools to init all MLIR
dialects/passes/extensions. Currently they are implemeted as inline functions
and include essentially the entire MLIR header tree. Each f
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
// parsing and preprocessor state will not have that case.
// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.*-(ps4|ps5)}}
//
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -check-suffix=WITH-ANNEX-K%s
bugprone-unsafe-functions %t -- -- -D__STDC_LIB_EXT1__=1
-D__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__=1
-//
@@ -19,13 +18,16 @@ void notRelated(int A, int B) {}
int addedTogether(int A, int B) { return add(A, B); } // NO-WARN: Passed to
same function.
+// FIXME: This triggers a false positive: the "passed to same function"
heuristic
+// can't map the parameter index 1 to A and B
@@ -374,15 +373,25 @@ def parse_arguments() -> Tuple[argparse.Namespace,
List[str]]:
parser.add_argument(
"-std",
type=csv,
-default=["c++11-or-later"],
+default=None,
help="Passed to clang. Special -or-later values are expanded.",
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-non-const-parameter %t
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c99,c11,c17 %s readability-non-const-parameter
%t
vbvictor wrote:
It didn't work with c23? Please leave a fixme.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vbvictor commented:
Thank you for working on this.
This change is worth ReleaseNotes IMO, you could add them, we had [release
notes
](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/21.x/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst#improvements-to-clang-tidy)for
change in `chec
https://github.com/localspook updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
>From 20eb165f1abd9bf7976a2c401579a1284258e13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Chernyakin
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:52:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Stop ignoring `-std` argument in
`check
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for decimal floating point types, enable
these tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+
+// RUN: %c
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for decimal floating point types, enable
these tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+
+// RUN: %c
https://github.com/localspook edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/localspook updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
>From 20eb165f1abd9bf7976a2c401579a1284258e13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Chernyakin
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:52:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Stop ignoring `-std` argument in
`check_cla
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for decimal floating point types, enable
these tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+
+// RUN: %c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Victor Chernyakin (localspook)
Changes
Before, the tests were run with whatever Clang defaults to when you don't
specify a standard.
The tests are adapted to account for various things:
- `typeof` is changed to `__typeof__`; the non
https://github.com/localspook created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150791
Before, the tests were run with whatever Clang defaults to when you don't
specify a standard.
The tests are adapted to account for various things:
- `typeof` is changed to `__typeof__`; the non-`__ugly__` s
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (tcottin)
Changes
Followup work of #140498 to continue the work on clangd/clangd#529
Introduce the use of the Clang doxygen parser to parse the documentation of
hovered code.
- ASTContext independent doxygen parsing
- Parsing doxyge
https://github.com/tcottin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150790
Followup work of #140498 to continue the work on clangd/clangd#529
Introduce the use of the Clang doxygen parser to parse the documentation of
hovered code.
- ASTContext independent doxygen parsing
- Parsing d
https://github.com/Acthinks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149716
>From 1c7384eef864830fd5d4d4a7e4cf5455bda8d623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: actink
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 15:58:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][CUDA] Add support for __managed__ variables in
non-RDC and de
https://github.com/xlauko approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xlauko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150758
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+file(GLOB files ${CPACK_TEMPORARY_INSTALL_DIRECTORY}/lib/*.a
${CPACK_TEMPORARY_INSTALL_DIRECTORY}/lib/*.so*)
tstellar wrote:
I checked and they don't, so I've dropped this part.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381
_
@@ -629,6 +629,11 @@ static Value tryFoldCastChain(cir::CastOp op) {
}
OpFoldResult cir::CastOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (mlir::isa_and_present(adaptor.getSrc())) {
+// Propagate poison value
+return PoisonAttr::get(getContext(), getType());
@@ -2239,16 +2249,18 @@ static OpFoldResult
foldUnaryBitOp(mlir::Attribute inputAttr,
llvm::function_ref func,
bool poisonZero = false) {
+ if (mlir::isa_and_present(inputAttr)) {
+// Propagate poison value
+return inputAttr;
+ }
+
aut
@@ -1783,6 +1788,11 @@ static bool isBoolNot(cir::UnaryOp op) {
//
// and the argument of the first one (%0) will be used instead.
OpFoldResult cir::UnaryOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (auto poison = mlir::dyn_cast_if_present(adaptor.getInput()))
{
xlau
https://github.com/xlauko approved this pull request.
lgtm, with minot nits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def CIR_BoolAttr : CIR_Attr<"Bool", "bool",
[TypedAttrInterface]> {
// ZeroAttr
//===--===//
-def ZeroAttr : CIR_TypedAttr<"Zero", "zero"> {
+def CIR_ZeroAttr : CIR_TypedAttr<"Zero", "zer
@@ -138,14 +138,26 @@ def ZeroAttr : CIR_TypedAttr<"Zero", "zero"> {
// UndefAttr
//===--===//
-def UndefAttr : CIR_TypedAttr<"Undef", "undef"> {
+def CIR_UndefAttr : CIR_TypedAttr<"Undef", "undef"> {
---
@@ -2307,6 +2319,12 @@ OpFoldResult ByteSwapOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
}
OpFoldResult RotateOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
+ if (mlir::isa_and_present(adaptor.getInput()) ||
+ mlir::isa_and_present(adaptor.getAmount())) {
+// Propagate poison values
+return
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381
>From 24975b0426a779c6ee109f90e8b4cb09b826a18c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:40:51 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects
Fixes #133580
@@ -2239,16 +2249,18 @@ static OpFoldResult
foldUnaryBitOp(mlir::Attribute inputAttr,
llvm::function_ref func,
bool poisonZero = false) {
+ if (mlir::isa_and_present(inputAttr)) {
xlauko wrote:
```suggestion
if (mlir::isa_and_p
https://github.com/xlauko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
marcogmaia wrote:
FYI @kadircet @qinkunbao, thank you both for your time.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Marco Maia (marcogmaia)
Changes
This relands commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7355ea3f6b214d1569da43d02f9a166ff15012e6.
The original commit was reverted in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bfd73a5161608e6355
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Marco Maia (marcogmaia)
Changes
This relands commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7355ea3f6b214d1569da43d02f9a166ff15012e6.
The original commit was reverted in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bfd73a5
https://github.com/marcogmaia created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150788
This relands commit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7355ea3f6b214d1569da43d02f9a166ff15012e6.
The original commit was reverted in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bfd73a5161608e6355f7
aadanen wrote:
@DavidSpickett I've added %undo to the documentation and implemented %help.
Would it be good to also add %help to the documentation?
To print stuff, I am just using printf(). Is this fine? It would be easy to
switch to std::cout or it looks like there are some llvm print functio
https://github.com/aadanen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150348
>From 4e24cb20efa22e364d41026ae40aec470ff786aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Danen
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:01:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] added undo to docs in same format as %quit
---
clang/docs/Cl
https://github.com/aadanen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150348
>From 4e24cb20efa22e364d41026ae40aec470ff786aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Danen
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:01:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] added undo to docs in same format as %quit
---
clang/docs/Cl
@@ -1641,6 +1641,13 @@ def DeviceKernel : DeclOrTypeAttr {
}];
}
+def SYCLExternal : InheritableAttr {
+ let Spellings = [Clang<"sycl_external">];
schittir wrote:
This change fails two tests; will fix.
Clang :: CodeGenSPIRV/Builtins/generic_cast_to_ptr_ex
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vla`
running on `linaro-g3-04` while building `clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/9809
Here is the relevant piece of the buil
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/19589
Here is the relevant piece of the build lo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/20240
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/20443
Here is the relevant
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@anthonyhatran Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a
https://github.com/delcypher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145967
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Anthony Tran
Date: 2025-07-26T08:50:25-07:00
New Revision: 29992cfd628ed5b968ccb73b17ed0521382ba317
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/29992cfd628ed5b968ccb73b17ed0521382ba317
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/29992cfd628ed5b968ccb73b17ed0521382ba317.diff
https://github.com/mgorny closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tru wrote:
> > How much slower is this? Last time I tested fatlto in our toolchain it took
> > a VERY long time to link.
>
>
>
> You're probably thinking about "full" LTO, this is fat thin LTO. Our naming
> is truly amazing. See https://llvm.org/docs/FatLTO.html.
>
>
>
> It should add abo
Author: Michał Górny
Date: 2025-07-26T17:22:18+02:00
New Revision: fa79c23ecc23d6e8a6956d9caedd0443ecdb5853
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa79c23ecc23d6e8a6956d9caedd0443ecdb5853
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa79c23ecc23d6e8a6956d9caedd0443ecdb5853.diff
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-b-1` while building `clang,llvm` at
step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/20441
Here is the rele
mgorny wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
> How much slower is this? Last time I tested fatlto in our toolchain it took a
> VERY long time to link.
You're probably thinking about "full" LTO, this is fat thin LTO. Our naming is
truly amazing. See https://llvm.org/docs/FatLTO.html.
It should add about 10% overhead.
https:
mgorny wrote:
Yeah, I can.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jroelofs closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: AZero13
Date: 2025-07-26T08:07:27-07:00
New Revision: f2fe4718aa162f05adf9ef09fce86fd076cf2706
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f2fe4718aa162f05adf9ef09fce86fd076cf2706
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f2fe4718aa162f05adf9ef09fce86fd076cf2706.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jpienaar wrote:
Thanks! Done, I assume you can submit once it passes? Else, let me know.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mgorny wrote:
Confirmed that #150769 fixes the issue. I'd appreciate if you could review it
promptly, so I could do a fresh clean build and check for more issues today.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Michał Górny (mgorny)
Changes
Fix the regression introduced in #149148 that incorrectly explicitly
linked `clangTransformer` when dylib was used. As a result, the executables
linking to `clangTidyLLVMModule` would end up linking bot
https://github.com/mgorny created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150769
Fix the regression introduced in #149148 that incorrectly explicitly linked
`clangTransformer` when dylib was used. As a result, the executables linking
to `clangTidyLLVMModule` would end up linking both the dy
tru wrote:
How much slower is this? Last time I tested fatlto in our toolchain it took a
VERY long time to link.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+file(GLOB files ${CPACK_TEMPORARY_INSTALL_DIRECTORY}/lib/*.a
${CPACK_TEMPORARY_INSTALL_DIRECTORY}/lib/*.so*)
nikic wrote:
I don't think we need `*.so` here? Those shouldn't contain LTO bitcode, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1
jpienaar wrote:
Yeah I was wondering if linkage related as that's only way with the code not
running that it could have impact. Definitely not intentionally skipping it ...
Well and it also explains why I couldn't see anything different while trying
different sanitizers, as I wasn't doing any
mgorny wrote:
(I'm trying a patch, will send a PR in a minute if it works)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mgorny wrote:
Oh, I think I know what's wrong here.
```diff
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/llvm/CMakeLists.txt
b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/llvm/CMakeLists.txt
index 3232f6e2cafe..4f1da43d3f1b 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/llvm/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/cla
tstellar wrote:
I figured out how to strip the binaries, so I've updated the patch. Though,
you could argue that people should only be using these libraries with the
compiler that comes with the release package, and in that case the LTO bitcode
would be useful. However, the release package is
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381
>From 24975b0426a779c6ee109f90e8b4cb09b826a18c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:40:51 +
Subject: [PATCH] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects
Fixes #133580
---
jhuber6 wrote:
Are there any blockers for this left?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2641,28 +2641,19 @@ class Formatter : public TokenAnalyzer {
int AlignmentDiff = 0;
for (const AnnotatedLine *Line : Lines) {
AlignmentDiff += countVariableAlignments(Line->Children);
- for (FormatToken *Tok = Line->First; Tok && Tok->Next; Tok = Tok->Nex
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150744
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jongmyeong Choi (jongmyeong-choi)
Changes
- Convert simple comment to detailed Doxygen-style documentation
- Add comprehensive examples of token concatenation cases
- Include examples of safe adjacency cases
- Clarify the function's purpose
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/jongmyeong-choi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150766
- Convert simple comment to detailed Doxygen-style documentation
- Add comprehensive examples of token concatenation cases
- Include examples of safe adjacency cases
- Clarify the function's purpose and r
mgorny wrote:
Well, that's what bisect said for me. 889faabe78d2cb182414430601d6da2ed6619be3
passed, 3feb6f971577701713034d3404b6737fe6462d43 failed.
llvm:
[llvm-core:llvm-22.0.0.:20250726-132422.log.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/21444961/llvm-core
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Bogdan Vetrenko
Date: 2025-07-26T15:46:06+02:00
New Revision: 652048ad2578c715d8d65d90fd3fe5d5d2bd42e7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/652048ad2578c715d8d65d90fd3fe5d5d2bd42e7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/652048ad2578c715d8d65d90fd3fe5d5d2bd42e7.dif
jpienaar wrote:
Those failures don't seem related (no StringSet used here, not activated for
abseil checks)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
mgorny wrote:
Tons of failures on Gentoo as well:
```
Total Discovered Tests: 1352
Unsupported : 8 (0.59%)
Passed : 399 (29.51%)
Expectedly Failed: 1 (0.07%)
Failed : 944 (69.82%)
```
At a quick glance, they look like something's segfaulting on exit:
```
FA
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150757
>From 8d1b6ac9820dc17b365546883d18bf852300048e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 12:24:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy][mlir] Make rewrite more conservative.
Don't
@@ -111,17 +111,24 @@ EditGenerator rewrite(RangeSelector Call, RangeSelector
Builder,
}
RewriteRuleWith useNewMlirOpBuilderCheckRule() {
- return makeRule(
+ Stencil message = cat("use 'OpType::create(builder, ...)' instead of "
+"'builder.create(..
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
