https://github.com/owenca edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
>From b404f5390ac5684c7452e69f6fe209e5215f8929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:37:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang-tidy] Add MLIR check for old op builder usage.
Mo
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From fbe4344831538480be33accd35ef618c6d0e50b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remote
mgorny wrote:
Thx.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/koachan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `libclc` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/38701
Here i
https://github.com/sylvestre closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Michał Górny
Date: 2025-07-20T12:26:51+09:00
New Revision: 58c3affdaa732fd6f8c7e6640396e7c6366bac9d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58c3affdaa732fd6f8c7e6640396e7c6366bac9d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58c3affdaa732fd6f8c7e6640396e7c6366bac9d.diff
mintsuki wrote:
A bunch of tests fail now... I feel like this change is too invasive for what I
can possibly do on my own, but I hope that the original commit message is
helpful in describing the problem at hand.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timothy Herchen (anematode)
Changes
Fixes #149669; the old check compared with the end of the literal, but
we can just check that after parsing digits, we're pointing to one character
past the token start.
---
Full diff: https://github.c
https://github.com/anematode created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149688
Fixes #149669; the old check compared with the end of the literal, but we can
just check that after parsing digits, we're pointing to one character past the
token start.
>From 5def3c282d446e6ac687cdef37710e9
https://github.com/koachan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652
>From 84da1b197113869b684f87bf580b37122d6a15e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koakuma
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 05:40:56 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SPARC][Driver] Move feature mode selection to
Arch/Sparc.cpp
Th
https://github.com/mintsuki updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
>From 491a834787083c74c3584839dc036cc1f54519c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mintsuki
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 00:21:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Override Generic_ELF::buildLinker() to avoid
callin
mintsuki wrote:
> Can you add a test to clang/test/Driver to show the behavior difference ?
@MaskRay done. Does this work?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/mintsuki updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
>From 468635d12a26a7e1d38fe9d1321a5f76167ddead Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mintsuki
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 00:21:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Override Generic_ELF::buildLinker() to avoid
callin
MaskRay wrote:
Can you add a test to clang/test/Driver to show the behavior difference ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
@@ -1445,3 +1445,8 @@ static_assert(test_member_null(), "");
}
}
+
+namespace GH149500 {
+ unsigned int * p = &(*(unsigned int *)0x400);
+ static const void *q = &(*(const struct sysrq_key_op *)0);
shafik wrote:
Maybe also `nullptr` test?
https://github.co
@@ -153,3 +150,7 @@ struct PR35214_X {
int PR35214_x;
int PR35214_y = ((struct PR35214_X *)&PR35214_x)->arr[1]; // expected-error
{{not a compile-time constant}}
int *PR35214_z = &((struct PR35214_X *)&PR35214_x)->arr[1]; // ok, &PR35214_x
+ 2
+
+
+int * GH149500_p = &(*(int
brad0 wrote:
This should be taken and created as a MR against the 21 release.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147133
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
---
Patch is 132.52 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149684.diff
31 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsAMDGPU.de
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
---
Patch is 132.52 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149684.diff
31 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsAMDGPU.def (
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
---
Patch is 132.52 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149684.diff
31 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
---
Patch is 132.52 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149684.diff
31 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/Builtin
brad0 wrote:
cc @MaskRay
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (mintsuki)
Changes
This change primarily makes it so that when targeting freestanding/unknown
OSes, the driver will not use `gcc` to link, but rather will link using
the chosen linker (`-fuse-ld=...`) directly.
If Clang is to be a cro
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/mintsuki created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149681
This change primarily makes it so that when targeting freestanding/unknown
OSes, the driver will not use `gcc` to link, but rather will link using
the chosen linker (`-fuse-ld=...`) directly.
If Clang is to be
naveen-seth wrote:
This now also leverages the `Scanner` in `DependencyDirectivesScanner.cpp` to
reuse its logic for properly lexing module related directives. For this to
happen, I had to first land two fixes with #148674 and #148685.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147630
_
https://github.com/naveen-seth updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147630
>From 6b440de2ed76a6095c4b68ba1301dfbd19f9a285 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naveen Seth Hanig
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 09:19:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Reland [clang][modules-driver] Add scanner to detect
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148622
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Manas
Date: 2025-07-20T01:18:24+03:00
New Revision: 54492c231c5d9091d086bfb767423415ea6bd0bc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54492c231c5d9091d086bfb767423415ea6bd0bc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54492c231c5d9091d086bfb767423415ea6bd0bc.diff
LOG: [c
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for decimal floating point types, enable
these tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+
+// RUN: %c
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for C++23 floating-point types, enable these
tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+// These suffi
@@ -225,6 +226,89 @@ void integer_complex_suffix() {
static_assert(v28 == 1J, "");
}
+// This is a C++23 feature, but Clang supports it in earlier language modes
+// as an extension, so we test it unconditionally.
vbvictor wrote:
I think we should not depen
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for C++23 floating-point types, enable these
tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+// These suffi
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+// TODO: When Clang adds support for C++23 floating-point types, enable these
tests by:
+//1. Removing all the #if 0 + #endif guards.
+//2. Removing all occurrences of the string "DISABLED-" in this file.
+//3. Deleting this message.
+// These suffi
@@ -540,6 +547,89 @@ class NotACopyAssignmentOperator {
Uy *getUy() const { return Ptr2; }
};
+// Support "extended" copy/move constructors
+class AllocatorAwareClass {
vbvictor wrote:
Could you add cases when the check will fire (I suppose it at least):
-
@@ -69,6 +69,28 @@ void
UnhandledSelfAssignmentCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
cxxMethodDecl(unless(hasDescendant(cxxMemberCallExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(
hasName("operator="), ofClass(equalsBoundNode("class";
+ // Checking that some ki
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy --match-partial-fixes %s llvm-mlir-op-builder %t
+
+namespace mlir {
+class Location {};
+class OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template
+ OpTy create(Location location, Args &&...args) {
+return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+ Location getUnknownL
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+//===--- MLIROpBuilderCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - llvm-mlir-op-builder
+
+llvm-mlir-op-builder
+
+
+Flags usage of old form of invoking create on MLIR's ``OpBuilder`` and suggests
+new form.
vbvictor wrote:
I think we should write why the user should
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+//===--- MLIROpBuilderCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ class LLVMModule : public ClangTidyModule {
CheckFactories.registerCheck(
"llvm-qualified-auto");
CheckFactories.registerCheck("llvm-twine-local");
+CheckFactories.registerCheck("llvm-mlir-op-builder");
vbvictor wrote:
Ple
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+//===--- MLIROpBuilderCheck.h - clang-tidy --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/vbvictor commented:
I think we need a more verbose check name for users to understand what is the
check about, e.g.
`llvm-prefer-new-mlir-op-builder`
`llvm-use-new-mlir-op-builder`
`llvm-use-static-function-mlir-op-builder`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149677.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Context.cpp (+37)
- (modified
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149677
None
>From 9db49be1f605ec039b984bd7df3e29c127df1866 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 23:02:13 +0200
Subject
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: None (Andres-Salamanca)
Changes
This PR introduces support for binary operations on bitfield members.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149676.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExpr
https://github.com/Andres-Salamanca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149676
This PR introduces support for binary operations on bitfield members.
>From c5da343296558a3a418c6282b104196d20f88a60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Salamanca
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 15:54:56 -050
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ayush Pareek (ayushpareek2003)
Changes
Fix an issue where local lambdas caused a crash when importing the std module
in LLDB due to missing capture fields in debug info.
Now closures always emit all fields for lambdas by skipping the `is
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Ayush Pareek (ayushpareek2003)
Changes
Fix an issue where local lambdas caused a crash when importing the std module
in LLDB due to missing capture fields in debug info.
Now closures always emit all fields for lambdas by skipping
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: Ayush Pareek (ayushpareek2003)
Changes
Fix an issue where local lambdas caused a crash when importing the std module
in LLDB due to missing capture fields in debug info.
Now closures always emit all fields for lambdas by skipping the
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/ayushpareek2003 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149674
Fix an issue where local lambdas caused a crash when importing the std module
in LLDB due to missing capture fields in debug info.
Now closures always emit all fields for lambdas by skipping the `isImp
https://github.com/thesamesam approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/14
@@ -77,6 +79,82 @@ class RocmInstallationDetector {
SPACKReleaseStr(SPACKReleaseStr.str()) {}
};
+ struct CommonBitcodeLibsPreferences {
+CommonBitcodeLibsPreferences(const Driver &D,
+ const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
+
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-07-19T21:39:06+02:00
New Revision: fed6db45dfbe10cf1a3dab663e8ceb7e7974d713
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fed6db45dfbe10cf1a3dab663e8ceb7e7974d713
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fed6db45dfbe10cf1a3dab663e8ceb7e7974d713.diff
L
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149330
>From 452950ede23a7a21ca88db3600297d67935ddf51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:04:18 +0200
Subject: [PAT
MaskRay wrote:
Add a fclang test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vgvassilev wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a463bd43e626695b7221b0cf20cdaa5970cfe98
should bring piece in the galaxy.
However, I am puzzled by the system-z (s390) -- it is a big endian -- it is a
good test bed for the conformance for low-level primitives such as
`clang::Val
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2025-07-19T17:45:56Z
New Revision: 0a463bd43e626695b7221b0cf20cdaa5970cfe98
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a463bd43e626695b7221b0cf20cdaa5970cfe98
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a463bd43e626695b7221b0cf20cdaa5970cfe98.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: c43f828
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/16391072188
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
https://github.com/l
koachan wrote:
> > This is so that it's performed globally and not just for clang.
>
> Can you elaborate what is "globally"?
Ah, I meant for flang and other frontends too, not just clang, as per the bug
report [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138494).
https://github.com/llvm
cor3ntin wrote:
/cherry-pick c43f828
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2025-07-19T19:30:16+02:00
New Revision: c43f828d59672b4844a7409e4660b9f8f509da35
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c43f828d59672b4844a7409e4660b9f8f509da35
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c43f828d59672b4844a7409e4660b9f8f509da35.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -30,11 +30,16 @@ SanitizerSpecialCaseList::create(const
std::vector &Paths,
std::unique_ptr
SanitizerSpecialCaseList::createOrDie(const std::vector &Paths,
- llvm::vfs::FileSystem &VFS) {
+ llvm::vfs
MaskRay wrote:
> This is so that it's performed globally and not just for clang.
Can you elaborate what is "globally"?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
5chmidti wrote:
> > Then I will split it up into {[11],[14, 17],[20],[23, 26]}
>
> BTW does this support C23? That would be nice to have too.
I totally forgot to add that :) I'll take a look at the rules for it, but might
only add it later
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146553
___
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149648
>From 5cbf868adba8682cc20e4647085ce6361d61455e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 12:38:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Be less strict about diagnosing null pointer
dere
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Aaron Puchert (aaronpuchert)
Changes
The FactManager managing the FactEntrys stays alive for the analysis of a
single function. We are already using that by allocating TIL S-expressions via
BumpPtrAllocator. We can do the same wi
https://github.com/aaronpuchert created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149660
The FactManager managing the FactEntrys stays alive for the analysis of a
single function. We are already using that by allocating TIL S-expressions via
BumpPtrAllocator. We can do the same with FactEntrys
ImpleLee wrote:
Now I make a utility function `getGCCCompatibleIntTypeForBitwidth` for this
type preference. It should also be used for `mode` attribute.
There is currently no test about this, but I don't know how to or even whether
should I write relevant tests.
There are many other places i
mgorny wrote:
This change broke installing symlinks. Now all symlinks are installed pointing
to the build directory, i.e.:
```
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13M Jul 19 16:18 amdgcn--amdhsa.bc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 82 Jul 19 16:18 bonaire-amdgcn--.bc ->
/var/tmp/portage/llvm-core/libclc-22.0.0.999
https://github.com/ImpleLee ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ImpleLee updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148954
>From 3b19742073d1625bbf5bb997325dac2f5003e17d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Imple Lee <80144331+imple...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 04:23:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] improve con
seanm wrote:
> Then I will split it up into {[11],[14, 17],[20],[23, 26]}
BTW does this support C23? That would be nice to have too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
mgorny wrote:
Filed #149657 to fix it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mgorny created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149657
Fix `libclc/utils/CMakeLists.txt` to expose `prepare_builtins_*` variables in
parent scope. This was a regression introduced in #148815 where the code was
moved into subdirectory, and the variables would no lon
mgorny wrote:
Obviously because `set` in a subdirectory doesn't get exposed to parent
`CMakeLists.txt`…
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
mgorny wrote:
This broke the standalone builds on Gentoo Linux amd64:
```
[1566/1676] cd /var/tmp/portage/llvm-core/libclc-22.0.0./work/libclc_build
&& -o
/var/tmp/portage/llvm-core/libclc-22.0.0./work/libclc_build/clspv--.bc
/var/tmp/portage/llvm-core/libclc-22.0.0./work/libclc_b
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please rebase from `main`. Release Notes were cleared after 21 branch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ enum NodeType {
/// function calling this intrinsic.
SPONENTRY,
- /// STACKADDR - Represents the llvm.stackaddr intrinsic. Takes no argument
+ /// STACKADDR - Represents the llvm.stackaddress intrinsic. Takes no argument
moorabbit wro
https://github.com/moorabbit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148281
>From 029d9fce6cdb75ea4819a107c7ed9f074bb36678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: moorabbit <215698969+moorab...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 09:25:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Add `__bu
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2025-07-19T14:31:19Z
New Revision: 50408eeff6020061ceb6685448e214f36c75f71b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50408eeff6020061ceb6685448e214f36c75f71b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50408eeff6020061ceb6685448e214f36c75f71b.diff
LO
5chmidti wrote:
> Gave this a very rought look, so only a couple of general
> questions/suggestions.
>
> Could we do something with methods that repeat in some of the visitors, e.g.
> `bool TraverseType(QualType QT)` and others. Maybe macros..? I can't think of
> a better idea right now.
I w
https://github.com/tbaederr approved this pull request.
Other than the small nit, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9346,9 +9346,12 @@ bool LValueExprEvaluator::VisitUnaryDeref(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
// [C++26][expr.unary.op]
// If the operand points to an object or function, the result
// denotes that object or function; otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
- return Success
5chmidti wrote:
Fixed multiple vars declared in one statement
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Koakuma (koachan)
Changes
This is so that it's performed globally and not just for clang.
This should fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138494.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652.diff
4
https://github.com/koachan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149652
This is so that it's performed globally and not just for clang.
This should fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138494.
>From 84da1b197113869b684f87bf580b37122d6a15e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
https://github.com/jyknight edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/19241
Here is the relevant piece of the build lo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/20125
Here is the relevant piece of the
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
