@@ -341,11 +341,23 @@ Expected> createLTO(const
ArgList &Args) {
Conf.CPU = Args.getLastArgValue(OPT_arch);
Conf.Options = codegen::InitTargetOptionsFromCodeGenFlags(Triple);
- Conf.RemarksFilename = RemarksFilename;
- Conf.RemarksPasses = RemarksPasses;
- Conf.Remarks
https://github.com/rampitec edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145192
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145207
>From 2e43d4b182cbc998fd19c4bb016123fc0bc15ee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 22:32:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][Clang][AST] Drop `llvm::` in front of `ArrayRef`
---
clang
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc -march=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1250 -show-mc-encoding -verify-machineinstrs
< %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX1250 %s
rampitec wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llv
@@ -636,5 +636,11 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_bitop3_b16, "IUi",
"nc", "bitop3-insts")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_cvt_sr_bf16_f32, "V2yV2yfUiIb", "nc",
"f32-to-f16bf16-cvt-sr-insts")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_cvt_sr_f16_f32, "V2hV2hfUiIb", "nc",
"f32-to-
https://github.com/rampitec updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145152
>From d8bfe8fad4f1ca7436dd8697b24cdfdb91be7a48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stanislav Mekhanoshin
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:24:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU] Add s_setprio_inc_wg gfx1250 instruction
---
https://github.com/jurahul created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145207
None
>From 3c87dfeac55948d4e4ba45f8164f0877485f2f6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 22:32:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][Clang][AST] Drop `llvm::` in front of `ArrayRef`
---
@@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ typedef int MyTypedef;
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT:"Location": {
// CHECK-NEXT: "Filename": "{{.*}}namespace.cpp",
-// CHECK-NEXT: "LineNumber": 15
+// CHECK-NEXT: "LineNumber": 14
evelez7 wrote:
Aft
@@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ New checks
Finds unintended character output from ``unsigned char`` and ``signed char``
to an ``ostream``.
+- New :doc:`misc-bool-bitwise-operation
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please keep alphabetical order (by check name) in this section.
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145044
>From ef3da9bb1debb04c3f3109cc10f8776f024265b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:51:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Explain why 'is_empty' evaluates to false Add tests for
var
nathanchance wrote:
I am seeing a backend error when building the Linux kernel for PowerPC after
this change. `cvise` spits out the following C reproducer:
```c
typedef unsigned __u8;
typedef unsigned __u32;
typedef long __u64;
typedef __u8 u8;
typedef __u32 u32;
typedef __u64 u64;
enum { true
@@ -72,6 +72,25 @@ def : Joined<["--", "-"], "plugin-opt=emit-llvm">,
Flags<[WrapperOnlyOption]>, Alias;
def : Joined<["--", "-"], "plugin-opt=emit-asm">,
Flags<[WrapperOnlyOption]>, Alias;
+
+def opt_remarks_filename : Separate<["--"], "opt-remarks-filename">,
+ Flags<[Wr
https://github.com/miguelcsx created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145200
## Problem
When using `-fsave-optimization-record` with offloading, the Clang driver
passes optimization record options like `-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-format=yaml`
to `clang-nvlink-wrapper`. However, the wrapp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Miguel Cárdenas (miguelcsx)
Changes
## Problem
When using `-fsave-optimization-record` with offloading, the Clang driver
passes optimization record options like `-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-format=yaml`
to `clang-nvlink-wrapper`. However, the
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
mccakit wrote:
Yeah, I saw it. Hope they look into it. This PR is like 2 months old, doxygen
parsing at clang have some patches I found online that date back to 2019.
I'm currently using tcottins PR branch right now, because that is the only way
of getting doxygen comments on my editor, which
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144161
>From a149c93c3f49b6a51de972dc8418299f4074ddf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Implement diagnostics for why `std::is_standard_layout`
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
---
Patch is 28.38 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145192.diff
13 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h (+1-1)
- (m
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145192
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ class PerformanceModule : public ClangTidyModule {
public:
void addCheckFactories(ClangTidyCheckFactories &CheckFactories) override {
CheckFactories.registerCheck("performance-avoid-endl");
+CheckFactories.registerCheck(
+"performance-bool-bi
https://github.com/denzor200 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145192
None
>From 5300020f16ac2e9a8449242b3c743616b2b2186b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 16:04:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][Clang] Adopt `llvm::copy` in Clang AST
---
clang/inc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Also change the constructor and `StringLiteral::Create` to take an
`ArrayRef` instead of a pointer and size, so that it can
be directly passed to `llvm::copy`. This also eliminates the need of
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mrcvtl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mrcvtl wrote:
> Could you associate this PR with the issue to fix, if any?
Done!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
Buildbots failures seems irrelevant
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aaronliu0130 wrote:
@mccakit It looks like there's currently a reply from @tcottin to
emaxx-google's last comment needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140498
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/malavikasamak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143205
>From 52e4413ea1e701dfe0b24cf957a26bb72732f066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MalavikaSamak
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:06:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Place holder message for sizeof operator in loops.
--
@@ -411,7 +412,48 @@ static void emitAtomicCmpXchg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
AtomicExpr *E, bool IsWeak,
CGF.Builder.SetInsertPoint(StoreExpectedBB);
// Update the memory at Expected with Old's value.
- CGF.Builder.CreateStore(Old, Val1);
+llvm::Type *ExpectedType = Expected
https://github.com/huixie90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78707
>From 904f24aa69b5df2e52a9f19c3e96fa94b47aec82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hui
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:33:43 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libc++] fix _Atomic c11 compare exchange does not update
expected re
@@ -411,7 +412,48 @@ static void emitAtomicCmpXchg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
AtomicExpr *E, bool IsWeak,
CGF.Builder.SetInsertPoint(StoreExpectedBB);
// Update the memory at Expected with Old's value.
- CGF.Builder.CreateStore(Old, Val1);
+llvm::Type *ExpectedType = Expected
https://github.com/jurahul created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145187
Also change the constructor and `StringLiteral::Create` to take an
`ArrayRef` instead of a pointer and size, so that it can be
directly passed to `llvm::copy`. This also eliminates the need of a specialized
si
@@ -411,7 +412,48 @@ static void emitAtomicCmpXchg(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
AtomicExpr *E, bool IsWeak,
CGF.Builder.SetInsertPoint(StoreExpectedBB);
// Update the memory at Expected with Old's value.
- CGF.Builder.CreateStore(Old, Val1);
+llvm::Type *ExpectedType = Expected
evelez7 wrote:
After our offline discussion, I think I'm going to close this PR in favor of
implementing mangling for all names.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/vbvictor commented:
Could you please run clang-tidy over your file and fix the errors, clangd can
detect them, too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 5
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/11917
Here is the rel
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145070
>From f3e1d5e735b42bb8c123fe16fbe8317ded219331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:36:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] document global variables
---
clang-tools-extra/clan
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145069
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-06-21T11:56:35-07:00
New Revision: 056b52df344f688fd3831a07bc477f77f883a696
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/056b52df344f688fd3831a07bc477f77f883a696
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/056b52df344f688fd3831a07bc477f77f883a696.diff
L
vbvictor wrote:
I played with matchers a bit, one `hasDescendant` may be eliminated by:
```diff
diff --git
a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp
b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp
index 4d5c25bf9f27..ab5e13fbb9cc 1006
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+//===--- MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - bugprone-move-shared-pointer-contents
+
+bugprone-move-shared-pointer-contents
+=
+
+
+Detects calls to move the contents out of a ``std::shared_ptr`` rather
+than moving the pointer itself. In other wor
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 004e79ee856a965459ce0372de97f4a89d0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a function is
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@stellar-aria Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a b
Author: Katherine Whitlock
Date: 2025-06-21T21:10:20+03:00
New Revision: e7dd223ec451d4e8e522aa4f2c2baaa3d027f347
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e7dd223ec451d4e8e522aa4f2c2baaa3d027f347
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e7dd223ec451d4e8e522aa4f2c2baaa3d027f347.
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
marcogmaia wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tal Kedar
Date: 2025-06-21T20:00:22+02:00
New Revision: 2ed089fb18b92ad668509076b9830f55d96d27fe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ed089fb18b92ad668509076b9830f55d96d27fe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ed089fb18b92ad668509076b9830f55d96d27fe.diff
LOG
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
> Actually, the cxxRecordDecl might not be in a macro, but the special member
> functions are.
The checker doc states:
`The check finds classes where some but not all of the special member functions
are defined.`
I think we only need to ignore if the whole class expands from ma
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
This patch adds extra function attributes to the `cir.call` operation. The
extra attributes now may contain a single `cir.nothrow` attribute that
indicates whether the callee throws.
---
Full diff: https://gith
https://github.com/Lancern created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145178
This patch adds extra function attributes to the `cir.call` operation. The
extra attributes now may contain a single `cir.nothrow` attribute that
indicates whether the callee throws.
>From ca4ea5e82bb67f41004f
Author: yronglin
Date: 2025-06-21T18:58:56+08:00
New Revision: ea321392ebc487c1000e43576f44af99edf28a5f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea321392ebc487c1000e43576f44af99edf28a5f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea321392ebc487c1000e43576f44af99edf28a5f.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/kedartal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145145
>From 1d024e85d38452d5d149d97d830f12b2126b3c95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tal Kedar
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:23:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang/docs] add a missing brace in
ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst
.
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145142
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hassnaaHamdi wrote:
About the failing test, after modifying the Microsoft ABI to allow emitting
vtable MD -similarly to what I did for Itanium ABI-, I found out that the
GlobalOpt pass can't eliminate the generated unused Vtable aliases because
their linkage is `ExternalLinkage` which is expli
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
Could you associate this PR with the issue to fix, if any?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
snarang181 wrote:
> Thank you for the patch! Please add a release note in
> `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.
@zwuis, added a description of the patch in the release notes and addressed
your review comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
_
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a functio
https://github.com/vbvictor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143554
>From 5c975c6b59c02b0464a9bfc1b424b89b4d7dd662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Baranov
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:27:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tidy] add 'IgnoreMarcos' option to 'avoid-goto'
ch
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -872,20 +895,122 @@ const CGFunctionInfo
&CodeGenTypes::arrangeLLVMFunctionInfo(
} else if (info.getCC() == CC_Swift || info.getCC() == CC_SwiftAsync) {
swiftcall::computeABIInfo(CGM, *FI);
} else {
-CGM.getABIInfo().computeInfo(*FI);
+if (isBPF)
+ CGM.
@@ -858,12 +865,28 @@ const CGFunctionInfo
&CodeGenTypes::arrangeLLVMFunctionInfo(
// Construct the function info. We co-allocate the ArgInfos.
FI = CGFunctionInfo::create(CC, isInstanceMethod, isChainCall,
isDelegateCall,
info, paramInfos,
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ add_clang_library(clangCodeGen
LINK_LIBS
clangAST
+ LLVMABI
nikic wrote:
This should be part of LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140112
___
cfe-commit
@@ -858,12 +865,28 @@ const CGFunctionInfo
&CodeGenTypes::arrangeLLVMFunctionInfo(
// Construct the function info. We co-allocate the ArgInfos.
FI = CGFunctionInfo::create(CC, isInstanceMethod, isChainCall,
isDelegateCall,
info, paramInfos,
@@ -858,12 +865,28 @@ const CGFunctionInfo
&CodeGenTypes::arrangeLLVMFunctionInfo(
// Construct the function info. We co-allocate the ArgInfos.
FI = CGFunctionInfo::create(CC, isInstanceMethod, isChainCall,
isDelegateCall,
info, paramInfos,
@@ -104,6 +106,17 @@ static CGCXXABI *createCXXABI(CodeGenModule &CGM) {
llvm_unreachable("invalid C++ ABI kind");
}
+static std::unique_ptr
+makeTargetCodeGenInfo(llvm::abi::TypeBuilder TB) {
nikic wrote:
The pass by value here is probably not intentional?
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+//=== ABITypeMapper.cpp - Maps LLVM ABI Types to LLVM IR Types --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -858,12 +865,28 @@ const CGFunctionInfo
&CodeGenTypes::arrangeLLVMFunctionInfo(
// Construct the function info. We co-allocate the ArgInfos.
FI = CGFunctionInfo::create(CC, isInstanceMethod, isChainCall,
isDelegateCall,
info, paramInfos,
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a functio
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a functio
@@ -681,6 +705,30 @@ static void CheckFallThroughForBody(Sema &S, const Decl
*D, const Stmt *Body,
if (CD.diag_FallThrough_HasNoReturn)
S.Diag(RBrace, CD.diag_FallThrough_HasNoReturn) << CD.FunKind;
} else if (!ReturnsVoid && CD.diag_FallThrough_ReturnsNonVoi
https://github.com/zwuis commented:
Thank you for the patch! Please add a release note in
`clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.
I'm not sure if this case should be handled:
```cpp
if (condition) {
throw 1;
} else {
throw 2;
}
```
Maybe we need to open an issue for it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
@@ -624,8 +624,32 @@ struct CheckFallThroughDiagnostics {
}
};
-} // anonymous namespace
+bool isKnownToAlwaysThrow(const FunctionDecl *FD) {
+ if (!FD->hasBody())
+return false;
+ const Stmt *Body = FD->getBody();
+ const Stmt *OnlyStmt = nullptr;
+
+ if (const auto
@@ -681,6 +705,30 @@ static void CheckFallThroughForBody(Sema &S, const Decl
*D, const Stmt *Body,
if (CD.diag_FallThrough_HasNoReturn)
S.Diag(RBrace, CD.diag_FallThrough_HasNoReturn) << CD.FunKind;
} else if (!ReturnsVoid && CD.diag_FallThrough_ReturnsNonVoi
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
> This causes a large compile-time regression:
> https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=1b5d6ec6855369d109fcb740ecd3812231b7a279&to=ea321392ebc487c1000e43576f44af99edf28a5f&stat=instructions:u
Thanks report this issue! This my first time to use this website and I
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-06-21T08:20:57-07:00
New Revision: ae372bfca890cc7a67553b3cb19134359b66c0e1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ae372bfca890cc7a67553b3cb19134359b66c0e1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ae372bfca890cc7a67553b3cb19134359b66c0e1.diff
L
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a functio
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145142
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang/test/SemaCXX/wreturn-always-throws.cpp
clang/l
https://github.com/royitaqi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145157
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143554
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a functio
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Samarth Narang (snarang181)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp (+45)
- (added) clang/test/SemaCXX/wreturn-always-throws.
https://github.com/snarang181 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/snarang181 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 359dfb1a835617a83ae13865817480e68aa67750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a function is
https://github.com/snarang181 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166
>From 2c2324a684f32266aace70fc12bec297971625e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samarth Narang
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:42:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress noreturn warning if last statement in a function is
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
