@@ -682,6 +688,9 @@ void NVPTX::getNVPTXTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
case CudaVersion::CUDA_##CUDA_VER:
\
PtxFeature = "+ptx" #PTX_VER;
\
break;
+
https://github.com/sergey-kozub updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123398
>From 04313ede76d272ec391361b9828e55d8a27b4bda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey Kozub
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:00:49 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for PTX 8.6 and CUDA 12.6 (12.8)
---
clang/inc
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-01-20T08:55:54+01:00
New Revision: 6972788bf3d330b7a6136e2ddd840782882b8dd0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6972788bf3d330b7a6136e2ddd840782882b8dd0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6972788bf3d330b7a6136e2ddd840782882b8dd0.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123523
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123522
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-01-20T08:44:59+01:00
New Revision: 046b064df0ac9d4530e79f11077a768383b1ca16
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/046b064df0ac9d4530e79f11077a768383b1ca16
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/046b064df0ac9d4530e79f11077a768383b1ca16.diff
L
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/13136
Here is th
@@ -422,7 +425,15 @@ std::vector
HeuristicResolverImpl::resolveDependentMember(
if (!RD->hasDefinition())
return {};
RD = RD->getDefinition();
-return lookupDependentName(RD, Name, Filter);
+return lookupDependentName(RD, Name, [&](const NamedDecl *ND) {
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Just a thought from my side, but not required at the moment because this aims
to be as simple as possible. Otherwise LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551
___
cfe-commits mailing l
HighCommander4 wrote:
Rebased on top of #123549. (I forgot to set up the stacking properly, so the
commits from #123549 show up here too. They will go away after #123549 merges
and I rebase again.)
Confirmed locally that `Clang.Index/complete-memfunc-cvquals.cpp` is now
passing.
https://gith
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121315
>From 6cd526368a02fa2cf2e764eee295d356f73c3c1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 01:52:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Upgrade HeuristicResolver to use QualType rather than
Author: Hervé Poussineau
Date: 2025-01-20T15:11:26+08:00
New Revision: 71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe.di
https://github.com/wzssyqa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
For ease of review, I split the PR into two patches (which I plan to squash):
* The first patch is mechanical changes to use and propagate `QualType` rather
than `Type *` in HeuristicResolver interfaces (both public and internal), where
it makes sense.
* The second patch
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123549
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clangd/FindTarget.cpp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123549
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clangd/Find
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123549
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clangd/FindTarget.cpp (
https://github.com/HighCommander4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123549
>From cd87f05f19f245e24f5c29b97af0b69266608d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 01:52:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1
jroelofs wrote:
cc @ian-twilightcoder
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
> I don't think that's actually intended though.
Are you saying we should open a LWG issue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
HighCommander4 wrote:
> This made me realize that `HeuristicResolver::getPointeeType()` actually has
> a deficiency where it incorrectly discards the cv-qualifiers of the returned
> pointee type. I'll fix that in a dependent patch before proceeding with this.
Filed https://github.com/llvm/llvm
haopliu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this crash and the fixing, @fhahn!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117104
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
I don't really have enough experience with the AST matcher implementations to
provide an authoritative review of this, sorry.
I did do some digging in the code history, and found that `TypeLocTypeMatcher`
did store a `Matcher` in the past. That was changed in
https://git
@@ -191,4 +192,4 @@ int g = sfinae_me(); // expected-error{{no matching
function for call to 's
namespace NullExceptionDecl {
template auto get = []() { try { } catch(...) {}; return I; }; //
expected-error{{initializer contains unexpanded parameter pack 'I'}}
-}
+}
@@ -13464,6 +13464,14 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnAliasDeclaration(Scope *S,
AccessSpecifier AS,
}
TemplateParameterList *TemplateParams = TemplateParamLists[0];
+// Check shadowing of a template parameter name
+for (NamedDecl *TP : TemplateParams->asArray()) {
+
chandlerc wrote:
> Some good news, everything seems to pass after your latest changes in this
> PR! I didn't believe it at first and did a clean rebuild and test to verify.
> In the end everything passed again.
>
> That being said, I am working on deploying an updated version of VS2019 to
> o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chandler Carruth (chandlerc)
Changes
**Note:** This PR depends on #123302 and #123308 -- only the
last of the three commits should be reviewed here.
---
Historically, the main example of *very* large string
https://github.com/chandlerc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123548
**Note:** This PR depends on #123302 and #123308 -- only the last of the three
commits should be reviewed here.
---
Historically, the main example of *very* large string tables used the
`EmitCharArray` to wo
leijurv wrote:
Thank you for the review owenca, those are very reasonable changes,
particularly on the conditions where the BreakBeforeClosingAngle gets set/used!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commit
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/d
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/d
https://github.com/chandlerc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/11996
Here is the r
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account. See
[LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-email
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-01-19T22:23:11-05:00
New Revision: 4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc.diff
LO
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
LGTM for the LoongArch changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: None (Shakil582)
Changes
resolves #43831
I'll test it a bit more tomorrow. I think I saw something weird with the
--offset functionality when testing, but my additions worked for the test
cases I gave it.
---
Full diff: https:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/Shakil582 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123543
resolves #43831
I'll test it a bit more tomorrow. I think I saw something weird with the
--offset functionality when testing, but my additions worked for the test
cases I gave it.
>From 4dc0383b366b3105a
@@ -228,11 +228,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public
OSTargetInfo {
case llvm::Triple::arm:
this->MCountName = "__mcount";
break;
-case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
brad0 wrote:
Yes, I mentioned it in the comment.
https
kinoshita-fj wrote:
Because FUJITSU-MONAKA doesn't support FEAT_SPEv1p2, please remove it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
Author: Alex Voicu
Date: 2025-01-20T02:30:29Z
New Revision: b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7.diff
LOG: [N
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -228,11 +228,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public
OSTargetInfo {
case llvm::Triple::arm:
this->MCountName = "__mcount";
break;
-case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
SixWeining wrote:
Do you want to remove riscv32 either?
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Trevor Laughlin (trelau)
Changes
Inspired by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120300, add a new API
`clang_visitCXXMethods` to libclang (and the Python bindings) which allows
iterating over the class methods of a type.
---
Full
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/trelau created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123539
Inspired by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120300, add a new API
`clang_visitCXXMethods` to libclang (and the Python bindings) which allows
iterating over the class methods of a type.
>From bb0542e8f
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
>From e451a8869420d9240f9006eb2adb599a3e6fd9f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentyn Yukhymenko
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 23:13:46 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Reject declaring an alias template with the sa
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
This still needs tests and a release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5936,6 +5936,9 @@ def err_fold_expression_limit_exceeded: Error<
"instantiating fold expression with %0 arguments exceeded expression nesting
"
"limit of %1">, DefaultFatal, NoSFINAE;
+def note_function_like_macro_requires_parens
+: Note<"'%0' exists, but as a fun
@@ -2509,6 +2509,20 @@ bool Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec
&SS, LookupResult &R,
DC = DC->getLookupParent();
}
+ // Check whether a similar function-like macro exists and suggest it
Sirraide wrote:
Instead of doing this here before t
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ void test_NE() {
// CHECK: fix-it:"{{.*}}macro_with_initializer_list.cpp":{110:32-110:32}:")"
#define INIT(var, init) Foo var = init; // expected-note 3{{defined here}}
+// expected-note@-1 2{{'INIT' exists, but as a function-like macro; perhaps,
did you f
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Valentyn Yukhymenko (BaLiKfromUA)
Changes
Fixes llvm#123423
**How did I test it?**
Modified existing test and checked an example from the issue manually.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533.diff
3 Files Aff
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ namespace InFunctions {
template struct S3 { // expected-note {{template parameter is
declared here}}
template using T = int; // expected-error {{declaration of 'T'
shadows template parameter}}
};
- template using Z = Z;
+ template // expected-note
https://github.com/tahonermann updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105738
>From c5d4a8b94d0f5b294dda30b455c492e0a860906a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Honermann
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:44:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Support for MSVC compatible header search path
orde
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
Fixes llvm#123423
**How did I test it?**
Modified existing test and checked an example from the issue manually.
>From 0852c8ca587e772d5f851ac0983f43bdeec2ebd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentyn Yukhy
@@ -323,43 +323,59 @@ void AMDGPU::fillAMDGPUFeatureMap(StringRef GPU, const
Triple &T,
StringMap &Features) {
// XXX - What does the member GPU mean if device name string passed here?
if (T.isSPIRV() && T.getOS() == Triple::OSType::AMDHSA
dyung wrote:
> @dyung - OK, I think the current just-pushed version of this PR is worth
> another test.
>
> I've taught the TableGen string table emission to go back to working around
> the MSVC issues using a different table form that we used to use in LLVM when
> MSVC had a reliable error o
Sirraide wrote:
> Did you do a stage 2 build?
Not yet; that’s probably a good idea.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123523
>From db874d225e0994587ca15384679d070651e0cc99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:48:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Fix discarding DerivedToBase
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-19T10:56:57-08:00
New Revision: f13850a92c13d41ee377b8ebb2c226895fddbb57
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f13850a92c13d41ee377b8ebb2c226895fddbb57
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f13850a92c13d41ee377b8ebb2c226895fddbb57.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123523.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+6)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp (+15)
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123523
None
>From f5544cfbc4a3223d76f1a388bd4c20d78f14da12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:48:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Fix discarding DerivedT
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Now that we have it, use it.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123522.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+23-28)
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/Byt
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123522
Now that we have it, use it.
>From 9495bf522c349f8223f890c2581817814f7ba2f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:39:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode]
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -323,43 +323,59 @@ void AMDGPU::fillAMDGPUFeatureMap(StringRef GPU, const
Triple &T,
StringMap &Features) {
// XXX - What does the member GPU mean if device name string passed here?
if (T.isSPIRV() && T.getOS() == Triple::OSType::AMDHSA
@@ -323,43 +323,59 @@ void AMDGPU::fillAMDGPUFeatureMap(StringRef GPU, const
Triple &T,
StringMap &Features) {
// XXX - What does the member GPU mean if device name string passed here?
if (T.isSPIRV() && T.getOS() == Triple::OSType::AMDHSA
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -682,6 +688,9 @@ void NVPTX::getNVPTXTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &Triple,
case CudaVersion::CUDA_##CUDA_VER:
\
PtxFeature = "+ptx" #PTX_VER;
\
break;
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alex Voicu (AlexVlx)
Changes
When we did the initial AMDGCNSPIRV commits we left the initialisation of the
feature map in a relatively disorderly state. This change corrects that
oversight:
- We make sure that AMDGCNSPIRV actually advert
https://github.com/AlexVlx created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123519
When we did the initial AMDGCNSPIRV commits we left the initialisation of the
feature map in a relatively disorderly state. This change corrects that
oversight:
- We make sure that AMDGCNSPIRV actually adverti
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building
`clang-tools-extra,clang,llvm` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/11328
Here is th
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@DeNiCoN Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123506
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: DeNiCoN
Date: 2025-01-19T16:53:39+01:00
New Revision: 293dbea8b0169525d93a4ee4b7d6c53aa9d4bee0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/293dbea8b0169525d93a4ee4b7d6c53aa9d4bee0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/293dbea8b0169525d93a4ee4b7d6c53aa9d4bee0.diff
LOG:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/11979
Here is the r
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-01-19T16:29:56+01:00
New Revision: 0ab1f5772cbe6855d55bade566d885b7504c32ee
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ab1f5772cbe6855d55bade566d885b7504c32ee
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ab1f5772cbe6855d55bade566d885b7504c32ee.diff
L
DeNiCoN wrote:
@cor3ntin Yes. Thank you. Should I squash the commits or this can be done on
your side?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123506
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
jeremy-rifkin wrote:
There are implications with #123166, which might also be clang 21 material
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
redcode wrote:
> > > This seems related to #85995. Do you plan to fix that issue together?
> >
> >
> > I wasn't planning on fixing Clang's ``, I thought it would be
> > better handled by the maintainers of the standard library, but I can do it
> > if you want.
> > Do you want me to do it?
>
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
> > This seems related to #85995. Do you plan to fix that issue together?
>
> I wasn't planning on fixing Clang's ``, I thought it would be
> better handled by the maintainers of the standard library, but I can do it if
> you want.
>
> Do you want me to do it?
Oh, I di
redcode wrote:
> This seems related to #85995. Do you plan to fix that issue together?
I wasn't planning on fixing Clang's ``, I thought it would be better
handled by the maintainers of the standard library, but I can do it if you want.
Do you want me to do it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Do you need us to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123506
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
This seems related to #85995. Do you plan to fix that issue together?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123515.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+9)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/cxx17.cpp (+20)
``
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123515
None
>From 69df4b6dc60426aee3ff61e556c44f81427a0e1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:49:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Register decomposition
@@ -4785,6 +4790,19 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleRequirement(SourceLocation
RequiresExprLoc,
}
}
+void CXXNameMangler::mangleReferenceToPack(const NamedDecl* Pack) {
+if (const TemplateTypeParmDecl *TTP = dyn_cast(Pack))
+mangleTemplateParameter(TTP->getDepth()
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Manuel Sainz de Baranda y Goñi (redcode)
Changes
This small PR makes Clang predefine the following macros:
```
__INT8_C(c)
__INT16_C(c)
__INT32_C(c)
__INT64_C(c)
__INTMAX_C(c)
__UINT8_C(c)
__UINT16_C(c)
__UINT32_C(c)
__UINT64_C(c)
__UINTMA
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
