https://github.com/brad0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120689
>From 5f01b45635d4fe6bb22161d2312dca0c0df86827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:35:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Sema] Fixes for %b printf extension handling
The %b printf e
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
Should be readability-stringview-substr
There are already 2 other checks that use "stringview" instead of "string-view".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120055
___
cfe-commit
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/11653
Here is the r
@@ -110,20 +111,93 @@ static std::string computeBaseSysRoot(const Driver &D,
bool IncludeTriple) {
return std::string(SysRootDir);
}
+// GCC sysroot here means form sysroot from either --gcc-install-dir, or from
+// --gcc-toolchain or if the toolchain is installed alongside
mingmingl-llvm wrote:
thanks for taking a look!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Mingming Liu
Date: 2025-01-13T21:35:52-08:00
New Revision: 1ac52ec40acfcc039ab830404e7f7ac72dfe8480
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ac52ec40acfcc039ab830404e7f7ac72dfe8480
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ac52ec40acfcc039ab830404e7f7ac72dfe8480.diff
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mingming Liu (mingmingl-llvm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/D
https://github.com/mingmingl-llvm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122860
None
>From 4d095938962f078f1b1d6d35c28f5fbae4a1349d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mingmingl
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:32:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC]Update -fsplit-machine-functions now aarch64 funct
@@ -207,10 +207,6 @@
return BUILTIN(x);
\
}
-#ifdef cl_khr_fp16
-
-#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_fp16 : enable
-
#define _CLC_DEFINE_UNARY_BUILTIN_FP16(FUNCTION)
\
_CLC_DEF _CLC
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
CUID is needed by CUDA/HIP for supporting accessing static device variables in
host function.
Currently CUID is only supported by the old driver for CUDA/HIP. The new driver
does not support it,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122858.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ExternalASTMerger.cpp (+2-2)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExternalAS
https://github.com/yxsamliu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122859
CUID is needed by CUDA/HIP for supporting accessing static device variables in
host function.
Currently CUID is only supported by the old driver for CUDA/HIP. The new driver
does not support it, which causes
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122858
None
>From 227e7f718acbef18a4b5e93cc6ea8cc0b2249062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:08:39 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [AST] Avoid repeated map lookups (NFC)
---
clang/li
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122856
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Literal migration
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Litera
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Litera
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122855
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Literal migration
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122854
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Literal migration
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122778
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-13T20:53:13-08:00
New Revision: 35f9d2ac49eb3344f528c5b0c3b75330ade93982
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35f9d2ac49eb3344f528c5b0c3b75330ade93982
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35f9d2ac49eb3344f528c5b0c3b75330ade93982.diff
L
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122820
>From 71ddb5a2b4cc8a9609410b436e896484401f5e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:03:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [HLSL] cbuffer: Create host layout struct and add resource
handle
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian` running on `gribozavr4` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/1
wzssyqa wrote:
You are right. My patch only fix the first problem: making a unit test of glibc
happy.
The failure test case of glibc is:
* check-local-headers
See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120673 also.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120526
__
https://github.com/chomosuke updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118568
>From b43a2602025bdacea06ced5171904fb5d765de9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chomosuke
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 07:10:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fixed removeFunctionArgs don't remove comma
---
.../clang-tid
https://github.com/chomosuke edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
LGTM, please update release note
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/ahatanak reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ahatanak wrote:
I meant to close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110048.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ahatanak wrote:
This change isn't needed anymore as it was decided that noexcept shouldn't be
used to compute discriminators of function and member function pointers (see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/106487#issuecomment-2440364300).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1100
ahatanak wrote:
This change isn't needed anymore as it was decided that `noexcept` shouldn't be
used to compute discriminators of function and member function pointers (see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/106487#issuecomment-2440364300).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/10
https://github.com/s-perron approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#122844
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Should this be backported to older supported releases as well? (FWIW, I think
> so.)
But I am not sure if there is still release there.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
/cherry-pick
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acbd822879f7727127926c25e1b47f5017f962c5
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
erichkeane wrote:
> Oh, I see, you're suggesting we remove the `getStdNamespace` check from this
> PR. Yeah, I think that's reasonable.
Yep, that is my suggestion, sorry I was insufficiently clear.
> But I'd somewhat question whether this PR and warning really has anything to
> do with the at
@@ -1,33 +1,44 @@
-; RUN: llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv-unknown-unknown %s -o - | FileCheck %s
farzonl wrote:
changed line endings from crlf to lf.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122839
___
cfe-commits mailing list
zygoloid wrote:
Oh, I see, you're suggesting we remove the `getStdNamespace` check from this
PR. Yeah, I think that's reasonable.
But I'd somewhat question whether this PR and warning really has anything to do
with the attribute names being "reserved" at that point -- we're not checking
wheth
@@ -997,6 +997,9 @@ def warn_npot_ms_struct : Warning<
"data types with sizes that aren't a power of two">,
DefaultError, InGroup;
+def err_itanium_layout_unimplemented : Error<
+ "Itanium-compatible layout for the Microsoft C++ ABI is not yet supported">;
---
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-fms-layout-compatibility=microsoft %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple x86_64-pc-windows-gnu %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emi
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120055
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+//===--- StringViewSubstrCheck.cpp - clang-tidy--*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/5chmidti commented:
You can move even more into the matchers. Here is a mock-up of what I mean
(untested):
```
m cxxMemberCallExpr(
anyOf(
cxxMemberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1)
# is substr, and bind arg 1
),
cxxMemberCallExpr(
argumentCoun
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+//===--- StringViewSubstrCheck.cpp - clang-tidy--*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/rapidsna commented:
Thanks for addressing comments! LGTM. You may still need to wait on Clang code
owners review though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
>From b2c656afdf99eff52d019b68fcbbc6ce4bbdd7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:51:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang] disallow the use of asterisks preceding
constructo
https://github.com/DanShaders updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98426
>From 723205411efe18dbe8bb154839525b59963b1638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Klishch
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:39:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Do not allow unorderable features in
[[gnu::target{
scottconstable wrote:
> > maurer: I think their point is that even if you are not changing the hash
> > scheme, you are proposing breaking compatibility of the identifier with
> > existing code. Since we don't want to do this many times, if we are
> > breaking compatibility with existing code,
@@ -20,13 +20,22 @@
namespace llvm {
+struct LowerAllowCheckOptions {
thurstond wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122765
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
@@ -20,13 +20,22 @@
namespace llvm {
+struct LowerAllowCheckOptions {
+ std::vector placeholder; // TODO: cutoffs
thurstond wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122765
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
https://github.com/thurstond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122765
>From 6c244a083b458637f35149547270ba25675ca417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thurston Dang
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:38:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [sanitizer][NFCI] Add Options to LowerAllowCheckPass
This
https://github.com/bpfoley updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121854
>From 10acf5fd8346d872e5f3110c03cea944f9062375 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Foley
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 14:35:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Note member decl when initializer list default
constructs m
https://github.com/bpfoley updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121854
>From 72ffbe4ef6b4f8fe6fa31fef7fd3f5c961495c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Foley
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 14:35:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Note member decl when initializer list default
constructs m
mathstuf wrote:
Should this be backported to older supported releases as well? (FWIW, I think
so.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
@@ -8836,13 +8836,22 @@ void FixedPointValueToString(SmallVectorImpl
&Str, llvm::APSInt Val,
unsigned Scale);
inline FunctionEffectsRef FunctionEffectsRef::get(QualType QT) {
+ const Type *TypePtr = QT.getTypePtr();
while (true) {
-QualTyp
@@ -7806,6 +7815,261 @@ bool
AArch64AsmParser::parseDirectiveSEHSaveAnyReg(SMLoc L, bool Paired,
return false;
}
+bool AArch64AsmParser::parseDirectiveAeabiSubSectionHeader(SMLoc L) {
+ // Expecting 3 AsmToken::Identifier after '.aeabi_subsection', a name and 2
+ // param
AaronBallman wrote:
> > > Just that the last bit of performance
> >
> >
> > Maybe we're talking about different situations; I may have missed some
> > context in the discussion of this PR. I didn't see this as being about the
> > last bit of performance. It sounded like this was going to know
@@ -81,10 +81,12 @@ Exception: accessor methods
The check assumes *accessor* methods of a class are stable, with a heuristic to
determine which methods are accessors. Specifically, parameter-free ``const``
-methods are treated as accessors. Note that this is not guaranteed to
https://github.com/jvoung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122290
>From 342ff1a05caa6943fe8a86415f30b433ac30106f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:10:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tidy] Add a release note about
unchecked-optional-access s
AaronBallman wrote:
> I saw this got updates over break. Did LWG make its decision already? Are you
> expecting re-review? I didn't see anything go across my emails about LWG, but
> I could definitely have missed it.
The LWG issue is still open: https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4149 but
d
@@ -96,3 +96,49 @@ namespace PR38286 {
template struct C; // expected-note {{non-type declaration found}}
template C::~C() {} // expected-error {{identifier 'C' after
'~' in destructor name does not name a type}}
}
+
+namespace GH121706 {
cor3ntin wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+//===--- SprintfArgumentOverlapCheck.cpp - clang-tidy ===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+//===--- SprintfArgumentOverlapCheck.h - clang-tidy -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
>From b2c656afdf99eff52d019b68fcbbc6ce4bbdd7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:51:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang] disallow the use of asterisks preceding
constructo
ceseo wrote:
This is breaking the AArch64 2-stage buildbot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/84/builds/1005
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122280
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
@@ -164,6 +164,33 @@ void UseRangesCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder)
{
static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag, const CallExpr &Call,
ArrayRef Indexes,
const ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto GetC
@@ -173,22 +200,27 @@ static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag,
const CallExpr &Call,
for (unsigned Index : Sorted) {
const Expr *Arg = Call.getArg(Index);
if (Commas[Index]) {
- if (Index >= Commas.size()) {
-Diag << FixItHint::CreateRemov
dwblaikie wrote:
> > Just that the last bit of performance
>
> Maybe we're talking about different situations; I may have missed some
> context in the discussion of this PR. I didn't see this as being about the
> last bit of performance. It sounded like this was going to knowingly
> introduce
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -164,6 +164,33 @@ void UseRangesCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder)
{
static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag, const CallExpr &Call,
ArrayRef Indexes,
const ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto GetC
@@ -164,6 +164,33 @@ void UseRangesCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder)
{
static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag, const CallExpr &Call,
ArrayRef Indexes,
const ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto GetC
@@ -164,6 +164,33 @@ void UseRangesCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder)
{
static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag, const CallExpr &Call,
ArrayRef Indexes,
const ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto GetC
@@ -356,6 +356,11 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to
validate ``namespace`` aliases.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-ranges
PiotrZSL wrote:
move to line 307, and best would be to split it into 2 entry, one for boost,
and other for modernize
https:
@@ -164,6 +164,33 @@ void UseRangesCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder)
{
static void removeFunctionArgs(DiagnosticBuilder &Diag, const CallExpr &Call,
ArrayRef Indexes,
const ASTContext &Ctx) {
+ auto GetC
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Litera
higher-performance wrote:
Hi @AaronBallman~ would you have a chance to do a final review? :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122778
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122778
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Literal migration
sarnex wrote:
> I believe the conclusion was that we should emit the builtin functions, but
> `__has_builtin` should return false for builtins only present in the aux
> triple. For the one test that complicates this behavior, I don't think the
> use-case is completely well-formed but was hopin
jhuber6 wrote:
> Sorry, I kind of got lost in the above discussion. Are additional changes
> required in Clang to parse builtins unsupported on the current target to make
> sure we don't break anything or is only changing the result of
> `__has_builtin` acceptable?
I believe the conclusion wa
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-13T11:38:20-08:00
New Revision: 19c0a6b5eb3a0c0619fccc140740500737fdcd47
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19c0a6b5eb3a0c0619fccc140740500737fdcd47
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19c0a6b5eb3a0c0619fccc140740500737fdcd47.diff
L
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-01-13T11:38:00-08:00
New Revision: 8ed99689038bcc89dca92a4a3a13a4ede166bd7e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ed99689038bcc89dca92a4a3a13a4ede166bd7e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ed99689038bcc89dca92a4a3a13a4ede166bd7e.diff
L
sarnex wrote:
Sorry, I kind of got lost in the above discussion. Are additional changes
required in Clang to parse builtins unsupported on the current target to make
sure we don't break anything or is only changing the result of `__has_builtin`
acceptable?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122773.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp (+1-1)
`
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122773
None
>From b6abdc748225c29544d3c82bfafb5fac3dfd67a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:30:49 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
In the below code B varies over the arg list via a loop. However, the
diagnostics do not vary with the loop.
Fix so that diagnostics can vary with B.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/farzonl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122772
In the below code B varies over the arg list via a loop. However, the
diagnostics do not vary with the loop.
Fix so that diagnostics can vary with B.
>From 9df164c835e7df5bf4ea863bd9735bb0e456cb6c Mon Sep 17 0
https://github.com/sivan-shani deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sivan-shani edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
