fhahn wrote:
> I guess there are no release notes or manual b/c this is not ready to be used
> by general users on the command line and that will come via another PR?
I added a release note as part of the Clang patch to the `Sanitizers` section:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#sa
https://github.com/DavidTruby commented:
Would it be a lot of work to add this flag for clang as well? It seems like the
behaviour would be equally useful there and I would prefer us to keep flags
available for both compilers where it makes sense.
In terms of implementation it looks like there'
DavidTruby wrote:
Would it be a lot of work to add this flag for `clang` as well? It seems like
the behaviour would be equally useful there and I would prefer us to keep flags
available for both compilers where it makes sense.
In terms of implementation it looks like there's already a clang-ti
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
1. -f[no-]sanitize-link-c++-runtime suppose to
override defauld behavior implied from `CCCIsCXX`
2. Take into account -nostdlib++
3. Fix typo hasFlag vs hasArg.
---
Ful
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120370
1. -f[no-]sanitize-link-c++-runtime suppose to
override defauld behavior implied from `CCCIsCXX`
2. Take into account -nostdlib++
3. Fix typo hasFlag vs hasArg.
>From 6787146cf0e81ad8a69b3b2fadd7caf0f49c7
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-debian-cpp20`
running on `clang-debian-cpp20` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/108/builds/7269
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian` running on `gribozavr4` while
building `llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/10896
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/15483
Here is the rel
@@ -1754,6 +1755,17 @@ static bool interp__builtin_vector_reduce(InterpState
&S, CodePtr OpPC,
PrimType ElemT = *S.getContext().classify(ElemType);
unsigned NumElems = Arg.getNumElems();
+ if (ElemType->isRealFloatingType()) {
+if (ID != Builtin::BI__builtin_reduce_a
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `llvm` at step 8 "Add check check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/13297
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-dev-x86-64` running
on `ml-opt-dev-x86-64-b1` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/137/builds/10519
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/14775
Here is the rele
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-devrel-x86-64`
running on `ml-opt-devrel-x86-64-b2` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/175/builds/10388
Here i
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-rel-x86-64` running
on `ml-opt-rel-x86-64-b1` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/10388
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building `llvm`
at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/12501
Here is the relevan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120367.diff
8 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (+2-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Int
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120367.diff
8 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (+2-1)
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuilt
https://github.com/farzonl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120367
None
>From bcc2e3e36bd179047237da3ca495220a542dc742 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Farzon Lotfi
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:44:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Add float type support to __builtin_reduce_add and
https://github.com/amane-ame edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119563
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/malavikasamak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112284
>From ea92377ca9b449e62dcb9385184c9edda8e14fdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MalavikaSamak
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:24:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Wunsafe-buffer-usage] False positives for & expression
i
https://github.com/amane-ame updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119563
From 659eda3ec76b63418f8b621b004728d9d7bf26ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amane-ame
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:17:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Fix crashes when passing VLA to va_arg
---
clang/li
https://github.com/amane-ame updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119563
From 3e2e04fbf1978d657bb6968c16f68ef7c4adfbdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amane-ame
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:17:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Fix crashes when passing VLA to va_arg
---
clang/li
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff f6f4744176c8838a55fabd6f978ac08c3612aabc
4b31ec912a6482e85ca64b71482e3911fd2dbba6 --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: David Green (davemgreen)
Changes
This started out as trying to combine bf16 fpround to BFCVT2 instructions, but
ended up removing the aarch64.neon.nfcvt intrinsics in favour of generating
fpround instructions directly. This simp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: David Green (davemgreen)
Changes
This started out as trying to combine bf16 fpround to BFCVT2 instructions, but
ended up removing the aarch64.neon.nfcvt intrinsics in favour of generating
fpround instructions directly. This simpli
https://github.com/davemgreen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120363
This started out as trying to combine bf16 fpround to BFCVT2 instructions, but
ended up removing the aarch64.neon.nfcvt intrinsics in favour of generating
fpround instructions directly. This simplifies the p
HighCommander4 wrote:
Thanks. I haven't had a chance to look through the patch in detail yet, but the
general shape seems reasonable.
I also wanted to check, have you resolved the issue you described in [this
comment](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/2252#issuecomment-2545141457)?
> no
@@ -365,3 +365,20 @@ namespace call_with_explicit_temporary_obj {
RefPtr { provide() }->method();
}
}
+
+namespace call_with_adopt_ref {
+ class Obj {
+ public:
+void ref() const;
+void deref() const;
+void method();
+ };
+
+ struct dummy {
+RefPtr any
Mick235711 wrote:
> This was approved, do you need someone to merge this for you?
Yes, I do; I don't really have merge permissions. Thanks a lot for the helping
hand.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-12-17T22:07:14-08:00
New Revision: 55e87a79b9c3e0cb80503a4b6eec0fab404b2966
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55e87a79b9c3e0cb80503a4b6eec0fab404b2966
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55e87a79b9c3e0cb80503a4b6eec0fab404b2966.diff
L
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+// Windows is unsupported because we use the Unix path separator `/` in the
test.
+
+// Add default directories before running clang to check default
+// search paths.
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: cp -R %S/Inputs/M
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120063
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> @ilya-biryukov I remember last time, the codes you shared to me actually
> based an open source project. I am wondering if you can open source some use
> for such projects (even for testing purpose). I think it will be pretty
> helpful to speedup the overall development
https://github.com/easyonaadit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120063
>From 999d6ffbc6adffcb499842467bec8d07b881af46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: easyonaadit
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:25:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][AMDGPU] Pre-commit clang and llvm tests for dynamic
@@ -17,12 +13,62 @@ define amdgpu_kernel void
@kernel_dynamic_stackalloc_vgpr_align4(ptr addrspace(1
ret void
}
+; ERR: remark: :0:0: cannot select: %{{[0-9]+}}:sreg_32(p5) =
G_DYN_STACKALLOC %{{[0-9]+}}:vgpr(s32), 1 (in function:
kernel_dynamic_stackalloc_vgpr_default_al
HighCommander4 wrote:
> Any chance this is backportable to the 19.x series? Or is it too dependent on
> changes since then?
>
> Or even better 18.x? (since a lot of downstream tools are dependent on 18.x
> and will be a while before they bump to 19)
If you're asking about the change being bac
vinay-deshmukh wrote:
Aside:
As I've been working on this issue, I've realized that it involves some
complexities that might not make it an ideal "good first issue" (in my
opinion). To keep labels consistent with the difficult level, if it is okay
with you, it would be great if you could re-
https://github.com/easyonaadit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120063
>From 999d6ffbc6adffcb499842467bec8d07b881af46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: easyonaadit
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:25:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][AMDGPU] Pre-commit clang and llvm tests for dynamic
@@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to
validate ``namespace`` aliases.
+-Improved :doc: `readability-implicit-bool-conversion
+ `
+ - `CheckConversionsToBool`: Allows enabling or disabling warnings for
implicit conversions to `bool` (default) : true .
@@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to
validate ``namespace`` aliases.
+-Improved :doc: `readability-implicit-bool-conversion
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please extend existing `readability-implicit-bool-conversion` entry.
https://github.com
shafik wrote:
I just realized it was already merged
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for the fix. Please add a more detailed summary, these are important
since they go into the git log and can be important for debugging downstream
breaks.
Something like "Fix by adding check in ActOnGCCAsmStmt that the domains of the
input and out
https://github.com/vinay-deshmukh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116462
>From daddb9e13db6ca8373dc7298d17aa36a03014aeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vinay Deshmukh <32487576+vinay-deshm...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:37:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/11]
https://github.com/vinay-deshmukh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116462
>From daddb9e13db6ca8373dc7298d17aa36a03014aeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vinay Deshmukh <32487576+vinay-deshm...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:37:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/11]
vitalybuka wrote:
```
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
b/clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
index 89f1215afd0c..234c28bfd2c3 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
@@ -1083,10 +1083,11 @@ SanitizerArgs::SanitizerArgs(const ToolChai
4m4n-x-B4w4ne wrote:
> update release note and doc also
I am doing it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120087
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
The problem is that some of check_cxx_source_compiles invocation does:
```
cat t.cpp
int main() {
}
/usr/local/google/home/vitalybuka/tmp/bot/llvm_build0/bin/clang++
-fsanitize=memory -nostdlib++ -nostdinc++ -fuse-ld=lld t.cpp
>> referenced by ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cp
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=,
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?=C3=81lvarez_Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/shafik commented:
This will eventually need a release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119711
__
@@ -19,3 +22,8 @@ config.suffixes = [
".td",
".test"
]
+
+# AIX 'diff' command doesn't support --strip-trailing-cr, but the internal
+# python implementation does, so use that for cross platform compatibility
+if platform.system() == "AIX":
+config.test_format = lit
vitalybuka wrote:
> > > > Actually this PR is the case of
> > > > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/3908, not #113491
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry about that.
> > > Are you able to dig up any of the cmake configure logs from these builds,
> > > so that we can figure out how this
https://github.com/rjmccall commented:
Let's just increase to 9 bits.
Have you checked whether the size of `Stmt` or `Expr` changes when you do this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// RUN: %clang_tysan -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t 10 >%t.out.0 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.out.0
+// RUN: %clang_tysan -O2 %s -o %t && %run %t 10 >%t.out 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.out
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+void __attribute__((noinline)) add_f
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_tysan -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t >%t.out 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.out
+
+#include
+
+// CHECK-NOT: ERROR: TypeSanitizer: type-aliasing-violation
+
+int main() {
+ union {
+int i;
+short s;
+ } u;
+
+ u.i = 42;
+ u.s = 1;
+
+ print
h-vetinari wrote:
Ping @vitalybuka
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108357
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: zotnhucucbot (wonbinbk)
Changes
A change list may include files that are not part of the compile
database, which can cause clang-tidy to fail (e.g., due to missing
included headers). To prevent false negatives, we should allow to skip
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/vzakhari closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vzakhari wrote:
Okay, I do not see an easy way to allow this option for `clang` without
printing it in the `--help` output, so I guess I will let it behave same way as
the other Flang-only options.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120320
___
https://github.com/shafik commented:
I guess there are no release notes or manual b/c this is not ready to be used
by general users on the command line and that will come via another PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76261
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ziqing Luo (ziqingluo-90)
Changes
We have already hit the limit of NumStmtBits downstream after
010d0115fc8e3834fc6f747f0841f3b1e467c4da, which adds 4 new StmtNodes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120341.diff
1
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120341
We have already hit the limit of NumStmtBits downstream after
010d0115fc8e3834fc6f747f0841f3b1e467c4da, which adds 4 new StmtNodes.
>From 6cb8ccb8005342c74018508e7e4d267bd6f44e4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
Author: Thurston Dang
Date: 2024-12-17T16:35:11-08:00
New Revision: c48d45e6a3bcc03ecc233499c6ba9d04e07ec68a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c48d45e6a3bcc03ecc233499c6ba9d04e07ec68a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c48d45e6a3bcc03ecc233499c6ba9d04e07ec68a.diff
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119896
>From dd1f6807904691586c715d447fff54915a46c751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:32:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][cmake] Apply bolt optimizations as part of the
clang
vitalybuka wrote:
> I think
> [llvm/llvm-test-suite#190](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite/pull/190)
> should fix this issue, but haven't tested on an affected arch.
>
> I'm a bit worried that we don't have a sanitizer to catch this issue (the
> negative left shift issue is an unrelated
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119896
>From dd1f6807904691586c715d447fff54915a46c751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:32:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][cmake] Apply bolt optimizations as part of the
clang
https://github.com/thurstond closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119896
>From dd1f6807904691586c715d447fff54915a46c751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:32:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][cmake] Apply bolt optimizations as part of the
clang
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -317,7 +311,7 @@ static SanitizerMask parseSanitizeTrapArgs(const Driver &D,
SanitizerMask AlwaysTrap; // Empty
vitalybuka wrote:
technically local-bounds is alwaystrap, but I working to change that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
https://github.com/thurstond edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/thurstond edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/thurstond edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119755
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -247,49 +247,87 @@ static SanitizerMask setGroupBits(SanitizerMask Kinds) {
return Kinds;
}
-// Computes the sanitizer mask based on the default plus opt-in (if supported)
-// minus opt-out.
+// Computes the sanitizer mask as:
+// Default + Arguments (in or out) + Alw
https://github.com/thurstond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
>From 9afe71655814ead9bd29acf5ebd515253777081d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thurston Dang
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 05:14:56 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [sanitizer] Refactor -f(no-)?sanitize-recover parsing
Thi
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120308
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120308
>From ac3ce2e8bacdf6b2e7f7d812b16b2854d5ca34f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:58:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
=?UTF-
https://github.com/kstoimenov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -652,44 +679,12 @@ SanitizerArgs::SanitizerArgs(const ToolChain &TC,
// default in ASan?
// Parse -f(no-)?sanitize-recover flags.
- SanitizerMask RecoverableKinds = RecoverableByDefault | AlwaysRecoverable;
- SanitizerMask DiagnosedUnrecoverableKinds;
- SanitizerMask
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120308
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Paul Kirth
Date: 2024-12-17T15:55:05-08:00
New Revision: f8d9f8ed9524ef01aeedca7833001efabc6cd223
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f8d9f8ed9524ef01aeedca7833001efabc6cd223
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f8d9f8ed9524ef01aeedca7833001efabc6cd223.diff
LO
ilovepi wrote:
@PeterChou1 It's been a few weeks since we've seen progress here. Is this
something you're planning to finish out? or should @petrhosek or I should
dedicate some effort into getting landed? The Clang-Doc refactor to use the
templates is going to be hard to review until this is i
@@ -,8 +,15 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(
}
}
- if (SS.isEmpty())
+ if (SS.isEmpty()) {
+if (getLangOpts().ObjC && !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
qiongsiwu wrote:
Good question. The reason I added the guard for Ob
https://github.com/wonbinbk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120325
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kiranchandramohan wrote:
> > > After #120165 clang started complaining about unknown option
> > > -f[no-]realloc-lhs.
> >
> >
> > Was this on an existing test?
>
> I noticed it when trying to compile a Fortran/C mix test where flang/clang
> were used as compilers and I passed `-fno-realloc-l
@@ -652,44 +679,12 @@ SanitizerArgs::SanitizerArgs(const ToolChain &TC,
// default in ASan?
// Parse -f(no-)?sanitize-recover flags.
- SanitizerMask RecoverableKinds = RecoverableByDefault | AlwaysRecoverable;
- SanitizerMask DiagnosedUnrecoverableKinds;
- SanitizerMask
https://github.com/qiongsiwu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119908
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/qiongsiwu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119908
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
goldsteinn wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tahonermann updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120327
>From 6ed96d3bf22c5da5af995ea5ffe083baf91594bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Honermann
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 16:03:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SYCL] Basic diagnostics for the sycl_kernel_entry_point
@@ -3465,7 +3465,7 @@ defm diagnostics_show_line_numbers :
BoolFOption<"diagnostics-show-line-numbers"
PosFlag>;
def fno_realloc_lhs : Flag<["-"], "fno-realloc-lhs">, Group,
HelpText<"An allocatable left-hand side of an intrinsic assignment is
assumed to be allocated and
vzakhari wrote:
> > After #120165 clang started complaining about unknown option
> > -f[no-]realloc-lhs.
>
> Was this on an existing test?
I noticed it when trying to compile a Fortran/C mix test where flang/clang were
used as compilers and I passed `-fno-realloc-lhs` in flags that were used
@@ -0,0 +1,785 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/zeroomega approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 9f231a85004fad080980e80ef881c81d1d5bb60e
6ed96d3bf22c5da5af995ea5ffe083baf91594bb --e
@@ -652,44 +679,12 @@ SanitizerArgs::SanitizerArgs(const ToolChain &TC,
// default in ASan?
// Parse -f(no-)?sanitize-recover flags.
- SanitizerMask RecoverableKinds = RecoverableByDefault | AlwaysRecoverable;
- SanitizerMask DiagnosedUnrecoverableKinds;
- SanitizerMask
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
