njames93 wrote:
Actually an ASTVisitor approach could be better here, this way you could create
a set of all the `CXXRecordDecls` that publicly inherit from or transitively
inherit from `::std::enable_shared_from_this` during traversal
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102299
_
@@ -2503,6 +2503,25 @@ TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest, IsDelegatingConstructor) {
cxxConstructorDecl(isDelegatingConstructor(), parameterCountIs(1;
}
+TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest, MatchesString) {
+ StatementMatcher Literal = stringLiteral(matchesString("foo.*"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-08-09T14:48:56+08:00
New Revision: 8410babc2b69ccb2259e77262ad2baaa17644bea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8410babc2b69ccb2259e77262ad2baaa17644bea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8410babc2b69ccb2259e77262ad2baaa17644bea.diff
LO
vitalybuka wrote:
I will take another look tomorrow.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-08-09T08:19:49+02:00
New Revision: 16dadecc05fa4986d4522c2c3a09a7628feb0fd4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16dadecc05fa4986d4522c2c3a09a7628feb0fd4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16dadecc05fa4986d4522c2c3a09a7628feb0fd4.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99825
The root cause of the issue is that I didn't realize the things in implicit
global module (the language linkage in module interfaces) should b
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102574
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99825
The root cause of the issue is that I didn't realize the things in implicit
global module (the language linkage in module interfaces) should be conside
vitalybuka wrote:
> > @vitalybuka @nikic Let me know if anything needs to be changed in this PR?
> > Else, will merge the PR after approval.
>
> Please review.
you should click "re-request review" button next to review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99439
_
https://github.com/Gitspike updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102152
>From 869b955eb55bc53e445a8809b56c702d7c312b46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hehouhua
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:55:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ASTMatcher] Add matches for StringLiteral which
matches lite
@@ -956,6 +956,25 @@ def err_ptrauth_indirect_goto_addrlabel_arithmetic : Error<
"%select{subtraction|addition}0 of address-of-label expressions is not "
"supported with ptrauth indirect gotos">;
+// __ptrauth qualifier
+def err_ptrauth_qualifier_invalid : Error<
+ "%sele
@@ -1758,6 +1758,34 @@ Also see the documentation for `@available
}];
}
+def PtrAuthDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatVariable;
+ let Heading = "__ptrauth, __ptrauth_restricted_intptr";
asl wrote:
`__ptrauth_restricted_intptr` is not here yet.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Motivated by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101348
Although I don't want the tool's doc to explain the standard's wording, the
wording itself has some unspeci
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102572
Motivated by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101348
Although I don't want the tool's doc to explain the standard's wording, the
wording itself has some unspecified thing. So I feel it will be hel
glandium wrote:
> and the fix is already applied from looking at
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/native/+/master/libs/nativewindow/include/android/hardware_buffer.h#329
it's not part of any released NDK, and it's common to be stuck with older NDKs.
Most people are probab
https://github.com/Gitspike updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102152
>From 0d8191b5d205c811364cf1f1b184bcbc9bbeda7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hehouhua
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:55:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][ASTMatcher] Add matches for StringLiteral which
matches
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-08-09T13:39:24+08:00
New Revision: be66c506c7fd6fdb7363f724075d02ca0d35713a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be66c506c7fd6fdb7363f724075d02ca0d35713a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be66c506c7fd6fdb7363f724075d02ca0d35713a.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Shoaib Meenai (smeenai)
Changes
The previous logic could fail in some edge cases.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102571.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/hmaptool/hmaptool (+5-2)
``dif
https://github.com/smeenai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102571
The previous logic could fail in some edge cases.
>From 28297fc4e0b3b21990f1d614115b8eb946989479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shoaib Meenai
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:59:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [hmaptool] F
https://github.com/yxsamliu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102569
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
This RFC proposes the addition of an atomic pragma to Clang, designed to
provide a more flexible mechanism for users to specify how atomic operations
should be handled during the lowering proces
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
This RFC proposes the addition of an atomic pragma to Clang, designed to
provide a more flexible mechanism for users to specify how atomic operations
should be handled during the lowering process
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu (yxsamliu)
Changes
This RFC proposes the addition of an atomic pragma to Clang, designed to
provide a more flexible mechanism for users to specify how atomic operations
should be handled duri
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102567
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102567
>From 4bc7053e1383e6aa9e1a60017be296e305b8da5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 21:54:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a unit test input file
I forgot to update the versi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Ian Anderson (ian-twilightcoder)
Changes
I forgot to update the version info in the SDKSettings file when I updated it
to the real version relevant to the test. The version in the SDKSettings file
isn't actually used for anything i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ian Anderson (ian-twilightcoder)
Changes
I forgot to update the version info in the SDKSettings file when I updated it
to the real version relevant to the test. The version in the SDKSettings file
isn't actually used for anything in the t
Author: akshaykumars614
Date: 2024-08-09T00:55:15-04:00
New Revision: 5297b750e54dafe16cc13f24b8d5478214e83682
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5297b750e54dafe16cc13f24b8d5478214e83682
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5297b750e54dafe16cc13f24b8d5478214e83682.dif
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102567
I forgot to update the version info in the SDKSettings file when I updated it
to the real version relevant to the test. The version in the SDKSettings file
isn't actually used for anything in the test
https://github.com/akshaykumars614 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100177
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kees wrote:
> > I'd expect some kind of diagnostic when the specified field doesn't have a
> > corresponding counted_by field.
>
> So there's a complication with that. The use case for this builtin is to
> automatically set the `count` field during allocation in the Linux kernel.
> (It could
https://github.com/Gitspike updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102152
>From ff2e7f928b7f29a89de20aeb0df2e718a5290759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hehouhua
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:55:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][ASTMatcher] Add matches for StringLiteral which
matches
https://github.com/jcsxky closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102554
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -951,7 +951,8 @@ static const Expr
*SubstituteConstraintExpressionWithoutSatisfaction(
DeclInfo.getDecl(), DeclInfo.getLexicalDeclContext(), /*Final=*/false,
/*Innermost=*/std::nullopt,
/*RelativeToPrimary=*/true,
- /*Pattern=*/nullptr, /*ForConstrain
jcsxky wrote:
> I'm sorry but this approach doesn't make sense to me.
>
> I have to say that I self-assigned the issue hours before this patch (I don't
> know when you started working on it because you haven't explained anything
> either), and that means I'll look into that recently since I've
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101398
The root cause of the issue is that I removed the codes before and failed to
recognize it in time and this was not found for a long time due
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102565
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101398
The root cause of the issue is that I removed the codes before and failed to
recognize it in time and this was not found for a long time due to it onl
mizvekov wrote:
> The description specifies "Reverted due to both regression reported on PR and
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102353"; but somehow the commit
> message does not include the reason.
>
> (I just tried to look at reverts without reasons and remind the authors.)
I
MaskRay wrote:
The description specifies "Reverted due to both regression reported on PR and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102353"; but somehow the commit
message does not include the reason.
(I just tried to look at reverts without reasons and remind the authors.)
https://github
yronglin wrote:
> LGTM otherwise. The CI currently fails on Windows, but that looks like it's
> using an old version of the test?
Thanks! Some local changes were missed last time and were not committed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102170
__
https://github.com/Gitspike updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102152
>From c062124cacf5caef4fcc57816c35250005fd32eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hehouhua
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:55:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ASTMatcher] Add matches for StringLiteral which
matches
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ constexpr int div(int a, int b) {
return a / b; // both-note {{division by zero}}
};
- return f(); // expected-note {{in call to '&f->operator()()'}} \
+ return f(); // expected-note {{in call to 'f.operator()()'}} \
yronglin wrote:
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102170
>From f14464c0734776cd79a2fbd93cec94e815276009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:22:29 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Interp] Fix display of syntactically-invalid note
for me
@@ -951,7 +951,8 @@ static const Expr
*SubstituteConstraintExpressionWithoutSatisfaction(
DeclInfo.getDecl(), DeclInfo.getLexicalDeclContext(), /*Final=*/false,
/*Innermost=*/std::nullopt,
/*RelativeToPrimary=*/true,
- /*Pattern=*/nullptr, /*ForConstrain
https://github.com/zyn0217 requested changes to this pull request.
I'm sorry but this approach doesn't make sense to me.
I have to say that I self-assigned the issue hours before this patch (I don't
know when you started working on it because you haven't explained anything
either), and that me
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102554
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2024-08-08T23:38:08-03:00
New Revision: 00139ae1bc0ae855ebe9c8991f480b382bbc4308
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00139ae1bc0ae855ebe9c8991f480b382bbc4308
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00139ae1bc0ae855ebe9c8991f480b382bbc4308.dif
mizvekov wrote:
> (It's #102353)
Updated, thanks for the correction.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
(It's #102353)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#102561
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
/cherry-pick 847f9cb0e868c8ec34f9aa86fdf846f8c4e0388b
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102287
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Although there is an issue report in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/98021. But it looks like an
existing issue and the previous "fix" is just a "coincidence". So I don't think
this is a regression and I like to backport this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
zyn0217 wrote:
> or if we would implement a `TypeAliasTemplateSpecializationDecl` only for the
> benefit of external resugarers.
It is not only valuable to external resugarers. Another point that warrants an
introduction of it is for unevaluated lambdas. These lambdas e.g. appearing as
part o
https://github.com/rjmccall approved this pull request.
Well, this is wonderful, thank you. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
jhuber6 wrote:
> FWIW, on one of my test systems that's currently very busy, check-offload
> consistently fails with amdgpu-arch timeouts. However, the following so far
> makes it consistently succeed:
>
> ```
> $ CLANG_TOOLCHAIN_PROGRAM_TIMEOUT=60 ninja check-offload
> ```
>
> Previously, I'
JustinStitt wrote:
@bwendling I tried to address all your feedback points with
4b3efbb41ff86eeff15671b1d876e1ef6a58a536 Let me know how that looks 👍
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100272
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
@@ -2877,6 +2888,17 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const
UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
} else if (type->isIntegerType()) {
QualType promotedType;
bool canPerformLossyDemotionCheck = false;
+
+// Is the pattern "while (i--)" and overflow exclusion?
+
@@ -293,6 +293,40 @@ To silence reports from unsigned integer overflow, you can
set
``-fsanitize-recover=unsigned-integer-overflow``, is particularly useful for
providing fuzzing signal without blowing up logs.
+Disabling instrumentation for common overflow patterns
+
@@ -555,6 +570,11 @@ class LangOptions : public LangOptionsBase {
/// The default stream kind used for HIP kernel launching.
GPUDefaultStreamKind GPUDefaultStream;
+ /// Which overflow patterns should be excluded from sanitizer instrumentation
+ int OverflowPatternExclus
@@ -293,6 +293,40 @@ To silence reports from unsigned integer overflow, you can
set
``-fsanitize-recover=unsigned-integer-overflow``, is particularly useful for
providing fuzzing signal without blowing up logs.
+Disabling instrumentation for common overflow patterns
+
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+// Check for potential false positives from patterns that _almost_ match
classic overflow-dependent or overflow-prone code patterns
JustinStitt wrote:
resolved in 4b3efbb41ff86eeff15671b1d876e1ef6a58a536
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
@@ -4248,6 +4248,22 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseLangArgs(LangOptions
&Opts, ArgList &Args,
Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value) << A->getAsString(Args) << Val;
}
+ if (auto *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_fsanitize_overflow_pattern_exclusion_EQ)) {
+for (int i
https://github.com/JustinStitt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100272
>From 154d3505ab13275086b3dffed67bcdcac52f79a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stitt
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:21:49 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] implement idiom exclusions
Add flag `-fno-sanitize-overf
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)
Changes
Skip adding template instantiation arguments when the declaration is a nested
class template when instantiating constraint expression.
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102320
---
Full di
https://github.com/jcsxky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102554
Skip adding template instantiation arguments when the declaration is a nested
class template when instantiating constraint expression.
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102320
>From 0080
jdenny-ornl wrote:
FWIW, on one of my test systems that's currently very busy, check-offload
consistently fails with amdgpu-arch timeouts. However, the following so far
makes it consistently succeed:
```
$ CLANG_TOOLCHAIN_PROGRAM_TIMEOUT=60 ninja check-offload
```
Previously, I've decreased
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Eli Friedman (efriedma-quic)
Changes
With opaque pointers, nothing directly uses the value type, so we can mutate it
if we want. This avoid doing a complicated RAUW dance.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102553
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Eli Friedman (efriedma-quic)
Changes
With opaque pointers, nothing directly uses the value type, so we can mutate it
if we want. This avoid doing a complicated RAUW dance.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102553.d
https://github.com/efriedma-quic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102553
With opaque pointers, nothing directly uses the value type, so we can mutate it
if we want. This avoid doing a complicated RAUW dance.
>From f3151c0b623881ca29d4c965f93cf5aa0714d32e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
>From 2b1255de05856e4c79f58d3e4071384ba80a881d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:26:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Sema] Don't mark VarDecls of bindings in
tuple-li
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
>From 7ba43ae2b737fbd868848a23b58b3965f8d36ce1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:49:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [WIP][Clang] Add __builtin_get_counted_by builtin
The __bu
bwendling wrote:
> I'd expect some kind of diagnostic when the specified field doesn't have a
> corresponding counted_by field.
So there's a complication with that. The use case for this builtin is to
automatically set the `count` field during allocation in the Linux kernel. (It
could be used
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
There's some followup discussion suggesting a different IR representation at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102199#discussion_r1706094411 .
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
>From c70e98cef58982fd7afb896fe08ebacc8b752009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 20:18:01 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[clang] Reland: Instantiate concepts with sugared
tem
MaskRay wrote:
> @tru @nikic @MaskRay should this be backported to 19 release branch?
Thanks for asking:) I think so. Invoked the cherry-pick command at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/10#issuecomment-2276883290
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102274
_
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
>From 6546428805b52f1b6f350193ab08ff027892710f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Joel E. Denny"
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:02:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Add env var for nvptx-arch/amdgpu-arch timeout
efriedma-quic wrote:
I'd expect some kind of diagnostic when the specified field doesn't have a
corresponding counted_by field.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
MaskRay wrote:
Conventionally, `.debug_*` sections are reserved for DWARF, even without
official standards.
GNU strip's default behavior --strip-all, emulated by llvm-objcopy's
--strip-all-gnu option, is roughly to remove non-SHF_ALLOC sections that are
not debug.
The `.llvm` prefix holds no s
shiltian wrote:
This PR is no longer needed. We decided to move the `AMDGPUAttributorPass` to
full LTO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
https://github.com/shiltian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
>From 7ba43ae2b737fbd868848a23b58b3965f8d36ce1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:49:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [WIP][Clang] Add __builtin_get_counted_by builtin
The __bu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This reverts commit 748371183ae769bfb485f1e7466a864bf1db93d5.
Reverted due to both regression reported on PR and #102253
---
Patch is 30.61 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://gith
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff bb7143f6669345825c214b26fbe336857f4bf523
197cd1c945c4b1c5cdd38d07f6ed5dd2baa96ab2 --e
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
This reverts commit 748371183ae769bfb485f1e7466a864bf1db93d5.
Reverted due to both regression reported on PR and #102253
>From cce965741a7496f792e3f94f47ae5acba06c4c39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Iz
bwendling wrote:
There's still some cleanup to do. Firstly, the code to get the `MemberExpr` for
the flexible array member. It's sloppy.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account. See
[LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-email
bwendling wrote:
@kees
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
The __builtin_get_counted_by builtin is used on a flexible array
pointer and returns a pointer to the "counted_by" attribute's COUNT
argument, which is a field in the same non-anonymous struct as the
flexib
https://github.com/bwendling created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102549
The __builtin_get_counted_by builtin is used on a flexible array
pointer and returns a pointer to the "counted_by" attribute's COUNT
argument, which is a field in the same non-anonymous struct as the
flexible a
https://github.com/malavikasamak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101585
>From 1ecd91c03f6de92153809402b10f99e5f649787f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MalavikaSamak
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:01:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Support adding
unsafe_buffer_u
@@ -116,6 +117,15 @@ ToolChain::executeToolChainProgram(StringRef Executable,
};
std::string ErrorMessage;
+ int SecondsToWait = DefaultSecondsToWait;
+ if (std::optional Str =
+ llvm::sys::Process::GetEnv("CLANG_TOOL_CHAIN_PROGRAM_WAIT")) {
+int Val = std::
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ def warn_drv_amdgpu_cov6: Warning<
" use at your own risk">;
def err_drv_undetermined_gpu_arch : Error<
"cannot determine %0 architecture: %1; consider passing it via "
- "'%2'">;
+ "'%2' or increasing the tool timeout using the environment variable "
+
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
>From 6546428805b52f1b6f350193ab08ff027892710f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Joel E. Denny"
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:02:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Add env var for nvptx-arch/amdgpu-arch timeout
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
