https://github.com/kovdan01 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99595
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-07-19T14:20:48+08:00
New Revision: 6f710fef838185cbbe11193b30d6adc354b08b28
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f710fef838185cbbe11193b30d6adc354b08b28
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f710fef838185cbbe11193b30d6adc354b08b28.diff
LO
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-07-19T13:38:57+08:00
New Revision: 2f0910d2d74419ef1ebf814b471af721ee78b464
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f0910d2d74419ef1ebf814b471af721ee78b464
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f0910d2d74419ef1ebf814b471af721ee78b464.diff
LO
@@ -5229,13 +5362,288 @@ static void emitTargetOutlinedFunction(
OMPBuilder.emitTargetRegionFunction(EntryInfo, GenerateOutlinedFunction,
true,
OutlinedFn, OutlinedFnID);
}
+OpenMPIRBuilder::InsertPointTy OpenMPIRBuilder::emitTargetTask(
Author: Shengchen Kan
Date: 2024-07-19T12:34:41+08:00
New Revision: 88e9bd822fe088eff74f49081b890071538fa40c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88e9bd822fe088eff74f49081b890071538fa40c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88e9bd822fe088eff74f49081b890071538fa40c.diff
@@ -13,6 +15,8 @@ void fun() {}
// ARM: ptrtoint ptr {{.*}} to i32, !nosanitize !5
// ARM: and i32 {{.*}}, -2, !nosanitize !5
// ARM: inttoptr i32 {{.*}} to ptr, !nosanitize !5
+// 64e: %[[STRIPPED:.*]] = ptrtoint ptr {{.*}} to i64, !nosanitize
+// 64e: call i64 @llvm
https://github.com/asl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99590
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asl approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99595
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oliver Hunt (ojhunt)
Changes
I accidentally did not include tests for the setting up runtime calls when
compiling with -fptrauth-function-pointer-type-discrimination
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99604.diff
1
https://github.com/ojhunt ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99604
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99604
I accidentally did not include tests for the setting up runtime calls when
compiling with -fptrauth-function-pointer-type-discrimination
>From 640779f0327c3b3773ff055923c59a82ae6c7f30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/1154
Here is the re
https://github.com/vfdff closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Allen
Date: 2024-07-19T11:19:21+08:00
New Revision: 1df2e0c344f0ddf7e09a9c89eba6bbee52142344
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1df2e0c344f0ddf7e09a9c89eba6bbee52142344
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1df2e0c344f0ddf7e09a9c89eba6bbee52142344.diff
LOG: [c
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 962d018234cb8c94e387fe3950cd030658850541
36e24bd88649e9d5771f1dbb668632d33ffe52d7 --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99479
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99479 for details
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99599.diff
16 Fil
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99599
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99479
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99479 for details
>From 36e24bd88649e9d5771f1dbb668632d33ffe52d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 87ca6386f9389f9d929d660e37701590092cefab
ef007ca0c0119298767bbc9f1a345969fe6e8c03 --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Akira Hatanaka (ahatanak)
Changes
Use type int as the underlying type when the enum type is incomplete.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99595.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp (+4-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Akira Hatanaka (ahatanak)
Changes
The function pointer needs to be authenticated before doing the type checks.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99590.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/Address.
https://github.com/h-vetinari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96171
>From 1df587efeb71fb1929667f008d7e9b251863d9d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Vetinari"
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:43:31 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [cmake] switch to CMake's native check_linker_flag,
delet
@@ -14636,6 +14645,20 @@ TreeTransform::TransformLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr
*E) {
/*IsInstantiation*/ true);
SavedContext.pop();
+ // Parts other than the capture e.g. the lambda body might still contain a
+ // pattern that an outer fold exp
@@ -23,3 +23,104 @@ namespace PR41576 {
}
static_assert(f(3, 4) == 6); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
}
+
+namespace PR85667 {
+
+template
+struct identity {
+ using type = T;
+};
+
+template void f() {
+
+ static_assert([](Is... x) {
+return ([I(x)] {
+ re
@@ -14636,6 +14645,20 @@ TreeTransform::TransformLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr
*E) {
/*IsInstantiation*/ true);
SavedContext.pop();
+ // Parts other than the capture e.g. the lambda body might still contain a
+ // pattern that an outer fold exp
https://github.com/androm3da closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Brian Cain
Date: 2024-07-18T21:12:21-05:00
New Revision: 962d018234cb8c94e387fe3950cd030658850541
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/962d018234cb8c94e387fe3950cd030658850541
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/962d018234cb8c94e387fe3950cd030658850541.diff
LO
@@ -688,7 +688,34 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
const CallExpr *E, llvm::Constant *calleeValue) {
CodeGenFunction::CGFPOptionsRAII FPOptsRAII(CGF, E);
CGCallee callee = CGCallee::forDirect(calle
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
No more comments from me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ece0662e3ca7086bbe4950660ad5b04be5a82055 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang codegen] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcall
@@ -1519,7 +1519,8 @@ bool Sema::IsAtLeastAsConstrained(NamedDecl *D1,
auto IsExpectedEntity = [](const FunctionDecl *FD) {
FunctionDecl::TemplatedKind Kind = FD->getTemplatedKind();
return Kind == FunctionDecl::TK_NonTemplate ||
- Kind == FunctionDe
chenzheng1030 wrote:
ping : )
Sorry, I may commit this directly if I don't get any further comments. I have
follow up patches based on this one. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97541
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
efriedma-quic wrote:
Pushed new version with an update to make Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression
slightly more strict. That handles the cases where the errors were getting
dropped. The tradeoff is that we're more strict about arithmetic overflow in
certain integer constant expressions (c
https://github.com/ahatanak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99595
Use type int as the underlying type when the enum type is incomplete.
>From 14612f84704edbcc3b3bcb20d6e114890e1c3998 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:59:46 -0700
Subject:
@@ -103,6 +105,7 @@ PPC_CPU("ppc476",SYS_CALL,44,BUILTIN_PPC_FALSE,0)
PPC_CPU("power8",SYS_CALL,45,USE_SYS_CONF,AIX_PPC8_VALUE)
PPC_CPU("power9",SYS_CALL,46,USE_SYS_CONF,AIX_PPC9_VALUE)
PPC_CPU("power10",SYS_CALL,47,USE_SYS_CONF,AIX_PPC10_VALUE)
+PPC_CPU("power11",SYS_CALL,48,U
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@
#define AIX_PPC8_VALUE 0x0001
#define AIX_PPC9_VALUE 0x0002
#define AIX_PPC10_VALUE 0x0004
+#define AIX_PPC11_VALUE 0x0008
chenzheng1030 wrote:
Where did you get this value? Is it documented somewhere? From the latest AIX
7.3
https://github.com/efriedma-quic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99579
>From 1137011c51285b083cab6c15de670e64337d3de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eli Friedman
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:51:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [ExprConstant] Handle shift overflow the same way as
ot
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 commented:
We also need more tests like:
1: `llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/check-cpu.ll`
2: at least one test in the backend like
`llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/p10-constants.ll`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99511
__
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 commented:
Basically you need to handle P11 for all the places where P10 is handled, seems
you are missing below places:
1: we need handling in `LoadOpcodesForSpill` and `StoreOpcodesForSpill` for
P11. Even for now P11 may already use the model of P10, we need a
@@ -672,6 +685,8 @@ def : ProcessorModel<"pwr7", P7Model,
ProcessorFeatures.P7Features>;
def : ProcessorModel<"pwr8", P8Model, ProcessorFeatures.P8Features>;
def : ProcessorModel<"pwr9", P9Model, ProcessorFeatures.P9Features>;
def : ProcessorModel<"pwr10", P10Model, ProcessorF
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99590
The function pointer needs to be authenticated before doing the type checks.
>From c44fbc480f8632a178633637010ab6953ed3e50d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:54:09 -0700
Su
@@ -2849,19 +2849,23 @@ static bool handleIntIntBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
if (SA != RHS) {
Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_large_shift)
<< RHS << E->getType() << LHS.getBitWidth();
+ if (!Info.noteUndefinedBehavior())
+r
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ constexpr int arb(int n) { // expected-note {{declared
here}}
expected-note {{function parameter 'n' with unknown value
cannot be used in a constant expression}}
}
constexpr long Overflow[(1 << 30) << 2]{}; // expected-warning {{requires 34
@@ -200,14 +200,7 @@ namespace LongInt {
};
enum shiftof {
-X = (1<<-29), // all-error {{expression is not an integral constant
expression}} \
- // all-note {{negative shift count -29}}
-
-X2 = (-1<<29), // cxx17-error {{expression is not an integral
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot8` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/1493
Here is the relevant piece of the b
zygoloid wrote:
As noted in one of the inline comments, it doesn't seem good to be losing a
diagnostic for ill-formed code. But this all makes sense to me as a step to
make our behavior more consistent. I wonder if it'd make sense to make our
folding behavior stricter by default as a prerequis
https://github.com/zygoloid edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99579
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2849,19 +2849,23 @@ static bool handleIntIntBinOp(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
if (SA != RHS) {
Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_large_shift)
<< RHS << E->getType() << LHS.getBitWidth();
+ if (!Info.noteUndefinedBehavior())
+r
@@ -200,14 +200,7 @@ namespace LongInt {
};
enum shiftof {
-X = (1<<-29), // all-error {{expression is not an integral constant
expression}} \
- // all-note {{negative shift count -29}}
-
-X2 = (-1<<29), // cxx17-error {{expression is not an integral
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ constexpr int arb(int n) { // expected-note {{declared
here}}
expected-note {{function parameter 'n' with unknown value
cannot be used in a constant expression}}
}
constexpr long Overflow[(1 << 30) << 2]{}; // expected-warning {{requires 34
@@ -2498,6 +2499,15 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
MSV->setOrigin(I, Origin);
}
}
+
+/// Store the current combined value at the specified origin
+/// location.
+void DoneAndStoreOrigin(TypeSize TS, Value *OriginPtr) {
+
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ Scanner::lexIncludeFilename(const char *&First, const char
*const End) {
void Scanner::lexPPDirectiveBody(const char *&First, const char *const End) {
while (true) {
const dependency_directives_scan::Token &Tok = lexToken(First, End);
-if (Tok.is(
@@ -2498,6 +2499,15 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
MSV->setOrigin(I, Origin);
}
}
+
+/// Store the current combined value at the specified origin
+/// location.
+void DoneAndStoreOrigin(TypeSize TS, Value *OriginPtr) {
+
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2498,6 +2499,15 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
MSV->setOrigin(I, Origin);
}
}
+
+/// Store the current combined value at the specified origin
+/// location.
+void DoneAndStoreOrigin(TypeSize TS, Value *OriginPtr) {
+
https://github.com/asl approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99482
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
I have another PR lined up to submit but it depends on this one. It would be
great if we can get some forward progress @owenca
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
@@ -2498,6 +2499,15 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
MSV->setOrigin(I, Origin);
}
}
+
+/// Store the current combined value at the specified origin
+/// location.
+void DoneAndStoreOrigin(TypeSize TS, Value *OriginPtr) {
+
https://github.com/ojhunt edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99576
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99576
>From 547ce3e9c7fe7e046b20f51f2f0d370a683659d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:58:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [PAC] Implement pointer authentication for C++ member
function p
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99576
>From c2bc964341fb4d0738e94d4afa6abc84eed0113c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:58:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Implement pointer authentication for C++ member
function
zeroomega wrote:
@cyndyishida I updated the patch to use CHECK-DAG and confirm the test now pass
under both XCode toolchain and our in house one. Please take a look. Thx.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99399
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
https://github.com/zeroomega updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99399
>From 15ac1fc1d3e2ca29e5b7b18a794f8ad036f95368 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haowei Wu
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:45:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix diagnostics-dsym.test on mac-arm64
The output ordering of diag
bob80905 wrote:
Just an FYI, the syntax for adding a resource_class attribute as currently
implemented looks like this:
`[[hlsl::resource_class(SRV)]]`
In your description, you may want to update this and other similar attributes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97362
https://github.com/bwendling closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Bill Wendling
Date: 2024-07-18T22:11:56Z
New Revision: 1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d2a20e0cc0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d2a20e0cc0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d2a20e0cc0.diff
LOG:
yshui wrote:
Good question. I will try to add one once I figure out how this test system
works
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
efriedma-quic wrote:
This seems fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zeroomega wrote:
> Thank you @zeroomega ! I am also running on arm64-mac and that test is
> passing. What is your `cmake` invocation? I'd like to dig into the underlying
> cause of non-stable ordering. It looks like the darwin-aarch64 is passing the
> test as well https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 49b2c30feb3730ccb1ba075dd37e68d47095bb23
1137011c51285b083cab6c15de670e64337d3de0 --e
efriedma-quic wrote:
Posted #99579.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Eli Friedman (efriedma-quic)
Changes
We have a mechanism to allow folding expressions that aren't ICEs as an
extension; use it more consistently.
This ends up causing bad effects on diagnostics in a few cases, but that's not
specific to
https://github.com/efriedma-quic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99579
We have a mechanism to allow folding expressions that aren't ICEs as an
extension; use it more consistently.
This ends up causing bad effects on diagnostics in a few cases, but that's not
specific to shif
@@ -235,3 +276,13 @@ void Negative() {
if (MACRO(x) == nullptr)
;
}
+
+void test_redundant_get() {
+ std::vector> v;
+ auto f = [](int) {};
+ for (auto i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); ++i) {
+f(*i->get());
njames93 wrote:
I think he is saying have a
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4afdcd98c5e28e0b353b21bf01c5cd3568878e41
571ab7b4f78cd2e4f89afcd9c35da1c07848742b --e
https://github.com/androm3da updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99552
>From c7fae87eadc5931902d8b0adb555f7ce4b0b99c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cain
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:08:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] [hexagon] handle --unwindlib arg
Signed-off-by: Brian Cai
Author: Jon Roelofs
Date: 2024-07-18T14:48:11-07:00
New Revision: 6c6baf019a25710cdc3c3971b09cd6332d0379c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c6baf019a25710cdc3c3971b09cd6332d0379c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c6baf019a25710cdc3c3971b09cd6332d0379c0.diff
L
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99576
Introduces type based signing of member function pointers. To support this
discrimination schema we no longer emit member function pointer to virtual
methods and indices into a vtable but migrate to using thunks.
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99426
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -154,3 +154,133 @@ a hint suggesting how to fix the problem.
As of this writing, Clang is able to compile a simple ATL hello world
application. There are still issues parsing WRL headers for modern Windows 8
apps, but they should be addressed soon.
+
+__forceinline behavior
@@ -154,3 +154,133 @@ a hint suggesting how to fix the problem.
As of this writing, Clang is able to compile a simple ATL hello world
application. There are still issues parsing WRL headers for modern Windows 8
rnk wrote:
"modern Windows 8" is obviously stale
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
>From f907be4ed6189729dd2546d597dd003a5edb1006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:32:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls
Only Fie
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4afdcd98c5e28e0b353b21bf01c5cd3568878e41
f907be4ed6189729dd2546d597dd003a5edb1006 --e
HighCommander4 wrote:
Is there a bug report this is fixing? Or a test case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct defined
within another struct has the same semantics as if it were defined outside of
the struct. So there's no need to look in
https://github.com/bwendling created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct defined
within another struct has the same semantics as if it were defined outside of
the struct. So there's no need to look into RecordDecl
@@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ def err_drv_unsupported_rtlib_for_platform : Error<
"unsupported runtime library '%0' for platform '%1'">;
def err_drv_invalid_unwindlib_name : Error<
"invalid unwind library name in argument '%0'">;
+def err_drv_unsupported_unwind_for_platform : Error<
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ def err_drv_unsupported_rtlib_for_platform : Error<
"unsupported runtime library '%0' for platform '%1'">;
def err_drv_invalid_unwindlib_name : Error<
"invalid unwind library name in argument '%0'">;
+def err_drv_unsupported_unwind_for_platform : Error<
@@ -235,3 +276,13 @@ void Negative() {
if (MACRO(x) == nullptr)
;
}
+
+void test_redundant_get() {
+ std::vector> v;
+ auto f = [](int) {};
+ for (auto i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); ++i) {
+f(*i->get());
akshaykumars614 wrote:
Can I add a member to
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99482
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99482
>From f2709fc1530537974a7fe8036f28558b9fb30bb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:26:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [test][PAC][clang] Add missing tests against linux
triples
@@ -3742,6 +3751,124 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
setOriginForNaryOp(I);
}
+ // Given two shadows ..., ..., return the interleaved value
+ // ABABABAB ...
+ //
+ // Width == number of elements in A == number of elements in B
+ Val
https://github.com/thurstond edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3865,6 +3866,42 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
setOriginForNaryOp(I);
}
+ /// Handle Arm NEON vector store intrinsics (vst{2,3,4}).
+ ///
+ /// Arm NEON vector store intrinsics have the output address (pointer) as the
+ /// last argument
@@ -3865,6 +3866,42 @@ struct MemorySanitizerVisitor : public
InstVisitor {
setOriginForNaryOp(I);
}
+ /// Handle Arm NEON vector store intrinsics (vst{2,3,4}).
+ ///
+ /// Arm NEON vector store intrinsics have the output address (pointer) as the
+ /// last argument
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pavel Skripkin (pskrgag)
Changes
`onwership_returns` works only with pointers, since it models user-defined
memory allocation functions. Make semantics more clear and report an error if
attribute is attached to wrong function.
Closes #9
1 - 100 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
