https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95969
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-07-13T08:53:02+02:00
New Revision: 1fe406fffe11dad0457a4d214ce67bf492196145
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1fe406fffe11dad0457a4d214ce67bf492196145
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1fe406fffe11dad0457a4d214ce67bf492196145.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Lambdaris updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94137
>From 23669f721d056d6e4961e2572e438e5c1f91cab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lambdaris
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:19:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [coverage] Mark branches with either counter is zero as
folded
Lambdaris wrote:
Add an option "--mcdc-exclude" to control which conditions can be excluded from
coverage. By default it's "constant,unreachable".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94137
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Lambdaris updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94137
>From 23669f721d056d6e4961e2572e438e5c1f91cab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lambdaris
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:19:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [coverage] Mark branches with either counter is zero as
folded
https://github.com/shafik requested changes to this pull request.
It looks like we are using the same pattern that fix is using in
`ASTStmtReader::VisitRequiresExpr` which gives me some comfort but I am not
happy that we have a relatively complex and easy to get wrong operation
repeated in thr
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct TransferrableTargetInfo {
unsigned short SuitableAlign;
unsigned short NewAlign;
unsigned MaxVectorAlign;
efriedma-quic wrote:
It's used in the same ASTContext code that's modified by this patch. Probably
fine to adjust it fo
efriedma-quic wrote:
The size of ArgFlagsTy is, as far as I can tell, basically irrelevant: it's
only used as part of computing the calling convention in isel. I don't think
anyone will notice if it's a few bytes larger.
The non-byval alignment limit was last adjusted in
https://reviews.llvm
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-13T07:25:47+02:00
New Revision: 66e6df22b5a509c16e50364d72b1a40bacaea91a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66e6df22b5a509c16e50364d72b1a40bacaea91a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66e6df22b5a509c16e50364d72b1a40bacaea91a.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-13T07:25:47+02:00
New Revision: 634128be4610a4d85d92935109ed7761f0e06af1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/634128be4610a4d85d92935109ed7761f0e06af1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/634128be4610a4d85d92935109ed7761f0e06af1.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-13T07:25:47+02:00
New Revision: 7d5902025d20e00b1865d02dfe514fb35259ae2a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d5902025d20e00b1865d02dfe514fb35259ae2a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d5902025d20e00b1865d02dfe514fb35259ae2a.diff
LO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Koakuma (koachan)
Changes
Implement handling for `-m(no-)v8plus` flags to allow the user to switch
between V8 and V8+ mode with 32-bit code.
Currently it only toggles the V9 feature bit, ABI and codegen changes will be
done in fut
https://github.com/koachan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98713
Implement handling for `-m(no-)v8plus` flags to allow the user to switch
between V8 and V8+ mode with 32-bit code.
Currently it only toggles the V9 feature bit, ABI and codegen changes will be
done in future pa
brad0 wrote:
> Hmm, this function also seems to exist on Linux, though. Additionally, from
> my `man syslog` docs:
I'm not sure what you mean by that in relation to this addition of a format
attribute.
> > The remaining arguments are a format, as in `printf(3)`, and any arguments
> > require
https://github.com/mizvekov requested changes to this pull request.
See previous comments, I think this is primarily an error recovery issue on the
decltype, we shouldn't let it escape an undeduced auto, as that would confuse
further analysis.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98622
__
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Brian Cain (androm3da)
Changes
These can be used to create a fully-bootstrapped toolchain to target hexagon
{baremetal,linux} with scripts like the ones in
https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon
---
Full diff: https://github.com/l
https://github.com/androm3da created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98712
These can be used to create a fully-bootstrapped toolchain to target hexagon
{baremetal,linux} with scripts like the ones in
https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon
>From 3cb0ce53c66815496ac0b5296ee36aa
@@ -7416,10 +7416,11 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(
tryToFixVariablyModifiedVarType(TInfo, R, D.getIdentifierLoc(),
/*DiagID=*/0);
- if (const AutoType *AutoT = R->getAs())
-CheckConstrainedAuto(
-AutoT,
-
@@ -7416,10 +7416,11 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(
tryToFixVariablyModifiedVarType(TInfo, R, D.getIdentifierLoc(),
/*DiagID=*/0);
- if (const AutoType *AutoT = R->getAs())
-CheckConstrainedAuto(
-AutoT,
-
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-07-13T11:49:21+08:00
New Revision: fb19649535d3d31a748409542947d09291643204
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb19649535d3d31a748409542947d09291643204
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb19649535d3d31a748409542947d09291643204.diff
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
LGTM, I agree that we currently don't use it, so we might as well remove it.
But the overall situation is all wrong, we shouldn't be storing fully formed
diagnostic strings in the AST, we should be storing them as PartialDiagnostics.
But
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
LGTM.
If it does fix the mentioned issue, please add a release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
shafik wrote:
> The sad part is that MSVC and some old versions of GCC don't like `template`
> being added here :(
It looks like the description provides a workaround for gcc but a bug report
against MSVC should be filed if we don' have one already.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9
CoTinker wrote:
Inconsistency here is inevitable.
Such struct `SuperEmpty { struct{ int a[0];} b;}` in c++ mode can not be
ignored in i386 for that c++ fields are never empty, and its TypeInfo.Width =
TypeInfo.Align = 0.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/594989918bf9e178f3b7c5e200d700d0
shafik wrote:
I don't think the build error is related to this change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for this fix!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vfdff wrote:
require Linux for this test as it time out on Windows ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vfdff wrote:
hi @efriedma-quic I find the case will timeout even without this changes ,so
would it reasonable to add **require Linux for this test** now ?
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/80879#0190a9c3-b007-4daa-9656-0c8f00601ee9
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
pranavk wrote:
This doesn't seem to handle all the cases? See
https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/1711 for absl build failures that are
not silenced by using this option.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98613
___
cfe-commits mailing l
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct TransferrableTargetInfo {
unsigned short SuitableAlign;
unsigned short NewAlign;
unsigned MaxVectorAlign;
phoebewang wrote:
What's this used for? Can we limit it to 2^14?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98629
___
phoebewang wrote:
> > max aligment [...] LLVM Verifier accepts is 2^14
>
> The verifier limit in most places is 2^32. It looks like 2^14 is specifically
> for ByVal. And there isn't really any good reason for that limit; it was
> arbitrarily chosen in
> [66011c1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Allen (vfdff)
Changes
Check whether timeout exists in the Windows operating system.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) clang/test/CodeGen/math-libcalls-tbaa.cpp (+38)
`
https://github.com/vfdff created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704
Check whether timeout exists in the Windows operating system.
>From 1b8503202474c15aa46fc4cc9151003a8d3ca336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:09:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH]
mizvekov wrote:
> Clarifying a couple of things here
I think we need the distinction between simple NFC, for trivial,
non-controversial and non-surprising changes like some renames, small
whitespace / formatting change, documentation changes, and complex NFC, which
requires some thinking and
sdkrystian wrote:
@pranavk see #98613
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -x hlsl -o -
-fsyntax-only %s -verify
-// expected-error@+1 {{invalid resource class specifier 'c' used; expected
'b', 's', 't', or 'u'}}
-float a : register(c0, space1);
+// valid, The register keywor
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94693
>From 4e4bcdc19268543a8348736dede46d8f8cad0066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Introduce [[clang::coro_inplace_task]]
---
clan
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94693
>From 4e4bcdc19268543a8348736dede46d8f8cad0066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Introduce [[clang::coro_inplace_task]]
---
clan
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -x hlsl -o -
-fsyntax-only %s -verify
-// expected-error@+1 {{invalid resource class specifier 'c' used; expected
'b', 's', 't', or 'u'}}
-float a : register(c0, space1);
+// valid, The register keywor
pranavk wrote:
Could we perhaps put this behind a flag to help with the transition?
Some cases can already be silenced with -Wno-missing-dependent-template-keyword
but cases like above in absl are hard errors and there are no workarounds.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547
__
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Youngsuk Kim (JOE1994)
Changes
Fix locations where dangling StringRefs are created.
* `ConstraintSatisfaction::SubstitutionDiagnostic`: typedef of
`std::pair`
* `concepts::Requirement::SubstitutionDiagn
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Youngsuk Kim (JOE1994)
Changes
Fix locations where dangling StringRefs are created.
* `ConstraintSatisfaction::SubstitutionDiagnostic`: typedef of
`std::pair`
* `concepts::Requirement::SubstitutionDiagnostic`:
https://github.com/JOE1994 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98699
Fix locations where dangling StringRefs are created.
* `ConstraintSatisfaction::SubstitutionDiagnostic`: typedef of
`std::pair`
* `concepts::Requirement::SubstitutionDiagnostic`: struct whose 1st and 3rd
data
https://github.com/bob80905 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97103
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jonathan Thackray (jthackray)
Changes
Add documentation for the `--print-supported-extensions`
option which appears to be missing at present.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98698.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modif
https://github.com/jthackray created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98698
Add documentation for the `--print-supported-extensions`
option which appears to be missing at present.
>From 8071d6f5da6d6a236a558e1488f2d9f1eb51719b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Thackray
Date: Fri
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96011
>From 84c6a2c9dea0d964db68b282b0236783a46ee292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:25:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] Rework implicit conversion sequences
This PR rewo
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96011
>From 84c6a2c9dea0d964db68b282b0236783a46ee292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:25:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [HLSL] Rework implicit conversion sequences
This PR rewo
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2ad7b4af95bc333d8f216915cd1b9d688590dcc5
84c6a2c9dea0d964db68b282b0236783a46ee292 --e
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96011
>From 84c6a2c9dea0d964db68b282b0236783a46ee292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:25:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [HLSL] Rework implicit conversion sequences
This PR reworks
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98696
>From c3431c0bedb23feac279efa43b51740353dcab8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:04:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Allow specifying pipe syntax for use-ranges checks
Add `UseRever
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-07-12T17:09:48-05:00
New Revision: 486d00eca6b6ab470e8324b52cdf9f32023c1c9a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/486d00eca6b6ab470e8324b52cdf9f32023c1c9a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/486d00eca6b6ab470e8324b52cdf9f32023c1c9a.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -170,3 +170,20 @@ Options
If `true` (default value) the boost headers are included as system headers
with angle brackets (`#include `), otherwise quotes are used
(`#include "boost.hpp"`).
+
+.. option:: UseReversePipe
+
+ When `true` (default `false`), Fixes which
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+#ifndef USE_RANGES_FAKE_STD_H
+#define USE_RANGES_FAKE_STD_H
+namespace std {
+
+template class vector {
+public:
EugeneZelenko wrote:
```suggestion
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98696
_
@@ -170,3 +170,20 @@ Options
If `true` (default value) the boost headers are included as system headers
with angle brackets (`#include `), otherwise quotes are used
(`#include "boost.hpp"`).
+
+.. option:: UseReversePipe
+
+ When `true` (default `false`), Fixes which
@@ -170,3 +170,20 @@ Options
If `true` (default value) the boost headers are included as system headers
with angle brackets (`#include `), otherwise quotes are used
(`#include "boost.hpp"`).
+
+.. option:: UseReversePipe
+
+ When `true` (default `false`), Fixes which
@@ -203,8 +203,12 @@ ABIArgInfo NVPTXABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty)
const {
void NVPTXABIInfo::computeInfo(CGFunctionInfo &FI) const {
if (!getCXXABI().classifyReturnType(FI))
FI.getReturnInfo() = classifyReturnType(FI.getReturnType());
+
+ unsigned Argument
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Nathan James (njames93)
Changes
Add `UseReversePipe` option to (boost|modernize)-use-ranges checks. This
controls whether to create a reverse view using function syntax
(`reverse(Range)`) or pipe syntax (`Range | reverse`)
--
https://github.com/njames93 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98696
Add `UseReversePipe` option to (boost|modernize)-use-ranges checks. This
controls whether to create a reverse view using function syntax
(`reverse(Range)`) or pipe syntax (`Range | reverse`)
>From f709a09351a6
5chmidti wrote:
rebased on trunk
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+
+//===-- TestLanguage.def - Language Versions for Testing *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+
+//===-- TestLanguage.def - Language Versions for Testing *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: A
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
>From 698ec5bb3e9247b4b47a99eeac4d0933fc0a59ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:32:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [NVPTX] Implement variadic functions using IR lowering
Summary:
T
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94243
>From e1a2f731a24840c4c922ead50393ad9ccf342d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:38:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][test] add TestLanguage.def to specify all tested
la
jroelofs wrote:
This one looks fairly benign, and while I agree that it is good to upstream
things wherever possible, my slight objection rests mostly on two principles:
* In general the community doesn't take behavior-changing patches purely on the
basis of eliminating merge conflicts for cod
@@ -203,8 +203,12 @@ ABIArgInfo NVPTXABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType Ty)
const {
void NVPTXABIInfo::computeInfo(CGFunctionInfo &FI) const {
if (!getCXXABI().classifyReturnType(FI))
FI.getReturnInfo() = classifyReturnType(FI.getReturnType());
+
+ unsigned Argument
https://github.com/Artem-B approved this pull request.
LGTM with a minor nit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Artem-B edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/1495
Here is the relevant piece of the bu
kovdan01 wrote:
@smithp35 I've implemented `pauthtest` ABI support - see new PR description for
details and tests for examples. I'm not sure if the implementation is nice and
maybe I've put some logic in wrong places while there are better ones, but the
result looks matching the requirements d
https://github.com/kovdan01 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
>From 3b4b1b1739b810d758e68f30c48b648963cff740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 00:50:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [PAC][Driver] Implement `-mbranch-protection=pauthabi`
opti
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
>From 3b4b1b1739b810d758e68f30c48b648963cff740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 00:50:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [PAC][Driver] Implement `-mbranch-protection=pauthabi`
opti
amilendra wrote:
> > If the diagnostics are downstream-only, does this really need go upstream?
>
> We try to upstream as much as possible to reduce merge conflicts.
@jroelofs
Do you have any objections to commiting this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98091
___
premanandrao wrote:
> I just ran the bootstrapping build with this patch applied and ran
> `check-runtimes`, and nothing failed. This might not be sufficient (perhaps I
> missed something important), but at first glance it doesn't seem to break
> anything on our side.
Thank you SO much!
Wo
https://github.com/PiJoules closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98695
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: PiJoules
Date: 2024-07-12T13:55:25-07:00
New Revision: 2ad7b4af95bc333d8f216915cd1b9d688590dcc5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ad7b4af95bc333d8f216915cd1b9d688590dcc5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ad7b4af95bc333d8f216915cd1b9d688590dcc5.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/zeroomega approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98695
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (PiJoules)
Changes
armv8m builtins aren't being built because `armv8m` doesn't match any of the
arm cpu strings in compiler-rt cmake files. Instead there's `armv8m.main` and
`armv8m.base`. We want to use the `armv8m.main` version.
-
https://github.com/PiJoules created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98695
armv8m builtins aren't being built because `armv8m` doesn't match any of the
arm cpu strings in compiler-rt cmake files. Instead there's `armv8m.main` and
`armv8m.base`. We want to use the `armv8m.main` version
ldionne wrote:
I just ran the bootstrapping build with this patch applied and ran
`check-runtimes`, and nothing failed. This might not be sufficient (perhaps I
missed something important), but at first glance it doesn't seem to break
anything on our side.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
njames93 wrote:
> Those functions could be listed as an bullet points.
> But anyway lest, merge this and check if this fixes issues.
Should be good, I actually built the docs this time rather than using a basic
rst viewer to test it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98662
_
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
steakhal wrote:
> _(Technical detail: I'll be on vacation during the next week, so I won't see
> updates on this PR until the 22nd of July. If you want to merge this PR, feel
> free to do so.)_
No need to rush. Have a nice one!
https://githu
jlebar wrote:
@Artem-B
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> Also
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/1427/steps/13/logs/stdio
>
> ```
> [20/21] Running compiler_rt regression tests
> llvm-lit:
> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lit.common.cfg.py:60:
> warning: Path reported by clang doe
jhuber6 wrote:
Ping, waiting on this so I can land
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96369.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96015
>From 8bd49caa9fa93fd3d0812e0a4315f8ff4956056a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:32:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NVPTX] Implement variadic functions using IR lowering
Summar
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98520
>From da863999000a6b12f2930247de9df3daf0e5a608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:54:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] The pragma STDC CX_LIMITED_RANGE ON should have
prece
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat (zahiraam)
Changes
The `pragma STDC CX_LIMITED_RANGE` should have precedence over the command line
`-fcomplex-arithmetic`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98520.diff
2 Files Affected:
https://github.com/zahiraam ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98520
>From da863999000a6b12f2930247de9df3daf0e5a608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:54:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] The pragma STDC CX_LIMITED_RANGE ON should have
prece
https://github.com/bob80905 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98419
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joshua Batista
Date: 2024-07-12T13:10:34-07:00
New Revision: 5dc371e289584928345f74f560a18a805226b5f8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dc371e289584928345f74f560a18a805226b5f8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dc371e289584928345f74f560a18a805226b5f8.diff
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/1782
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the
1 - 100 of 440 matches
Mail list logo