https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
I meant, at the beginning of X86_32ABIInfo::computeInfo there's a chain of if
statements that set up the properties of different calling conventions, and
maybe some bits could be set there. If you don't think that makes sense,
https://github.com/dvyukov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97848
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tchaikov wrote:
@HerrCai0907 Hello Congcong, thank you for your message. I appreciate your
willingness to help. As I don't have write access to the repository, I would be
grateful if you could review and merge this pull request for me. Please let me
know if you need any additional information
HerrCai0907 wrote:
Normally PR can be merged if someone approved PR. You can merge it by yourself.
If you don't have access, I'm glad to help you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93623
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
@@ -365,7 +365,12 @@ int DwarfInstructions::stepWithDwarf(A
&addressSpace, pint_t pc,
// Return address is address after call site instruction, so setting IP
to
// that does simulates a return.
- newRegisters.setIP(returnAddress);
+ //
+ // In case
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
re-think about this case. LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97969
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 requested changes to this pull request.
There are some other limitation for const variable to be internal linkage.
Please follow standard to exclude this case
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.link#3.2.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97969
__
@@ -5805,6 +5805,37 @@ void computeKnownFPClass(const Value *V, const APInt
&DemandedElts,
break;
}
+ case Instruction::BitCast: {
+const Value *Src;
+if (!match(Op, m_ElementWiseBitCast(m_Value(Src))) ||
+!Src->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy())
+ b
https://github.com/KanRobert closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97721
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Feng Zou
Date: 2024-07-08T13:12:50+08:00
New Revision: e603451f3cb16792fb46ab5f2fa50b05f3e5d935
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e603451f3cb16792fb46ab5f2fa50b05f3e5d935
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e603451f3cb16792fb46ab5f2fa50b05f3e5d935.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/ylzsx edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ylzsx edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Zhaoxin Yang (ylzsx)
Changes
…rch_simd_width`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.td (+2)
- (modified) clang/include
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zhaoxin Yang (ylzsx)
Changes
…rch_simd_width`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.td (+2)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/ylzsx created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97984
…rch_simd_width`.
>From bd70e74419947c32265d698163722552e80df12f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yangzhaoxin
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:40:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [LoongArch][clang] Add support for option `-msimd` a
svs-quic wrote:
> Thanks @efriedma-quic. I tried adding a test case for it locally and see that
> the code produced is different for llvm and gcc:
> https://godbolt.org/z/vdhGbvj6W
>
> Test case:
>
> ```
> struct s12 {int x[0];};
> struct s12 test_s12(struct s12 a) {
> return a;
> }
> ```
>
https://github.com/MaxEW707 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaxEW707 approved this pull request.
LGTM.
@MitalAshok I noticed in your commit messages you mentioned reworking
-fcomplete-member-pointers. Will that include fixing clang incorrectly warning
when an inheritance model is explicitly specified. Godbolt for reference:
https://
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-04` while building `clang`
at step 11 "build stage 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/623
Here is the relevant piece of th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot2` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/1134
Here is the relevant piece of the bu
phoebewang wrote:
> It looks like MSVC also applies this rule to fastcall.
Good catch, done!
> Maybe put a boolean in the "state" to try to group together the code for
> specific conventions, instead of directly checking the CC.
There are 3 special conventions here: vectorcall, fastcall and
https://github.com/phoebewang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97939
>From cf19ec8d705434ca6d989a72069dba1040c360ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:14:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [X86][vectorcall] Do not consume register for indirect
retur
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
>From a035ae25314f3168f73108988f2bb7671e7d9e7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:41:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Doc] Update documentation for no-transitive-change
---
cla
Author: Chen Zheng
Date: 2024-07-08T09:30:01+08:00
New Revision: afd0e6d06ba05cf3cd8b0bb91b6506242de78a4d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/afd0e6d06ba05cf3cd8b0bb91b6506242de78a4d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/afd0e6d06ba05cf3cd8b0bb91b6506242de78a4d.diff
LO
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/to268 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79845
>From 5cd7ca393c35ea31f76ceae522d9cd480f9381f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillot Tony
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:14:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Implementation base of N3006 Underspecified object
declarations
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+//===-- HLSLIntangibleTypes.def - HLSL standard intangible types *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -12335,6 +12335,10 @@ def warn_hlsl_availability_unavailable :
Warning,
InGroup, DefaultError;
+def err_hlsl_intangible_type_cannot_be_declared : Error<
+"HLSL intangible type cannot be declared here">;
+def err_hlsl_intangible_type_as_function_arg_or_return : Error<
+"
@@ -8001,6 +8001,12 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(
}
}
+ if (getLangOpts().HLSL) {
+if (R->isHLSLSpecificType() && !NewVD->isImplicit()) {
+ Diag(D.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_hlsl_intangible_type_cannot_be_declared);
llvm-beanz wrot
@@ -3428,6 +3428,12 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const BuiltinType *T) {
Out << 'u' << type_name.size() << type_name;
\
break;
#include "clang/Basic/AMDGPUTypes.def"
+#define HLSL_INTANGIBLE_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId)
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz commented:
Few comments, but mostly I really like this direction!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
@@ -365,7 +365,12 @@ int DwarfInstructions::stepWithDwarf(A
&addressSpace, pint_t pc,
// Return address is address after call site instruction, so setting IP
to
// that does simulates a return.
- newRegisters.setIP(returnAddress);
+ //
+ // In case
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355
>From ac803f979f2779da35a006988d2d42cdabbad252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 20:07:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2137 (list-initialization from
objec
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
If I'm understanding correctly, the way this currently works is that you do
normal field layout, then if you discover that the actual offset of a field is
less than the offset normal field layout would produce, you assume the struct
is packed. This
alexey-bataev wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Thank you take look!
>
>
>
> > Missed one thing, the assignments for boolean flags must be |=, otherwise
> > we may miss some combinations.
>
>
>
> Are you talking about assignment of following?
>
> HasMapBasePtr = any_of(M, [](c..
>
>
>
> Do I ne
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Carlos Galvez (carlosgalvezp)
Changes
Since in C++ they already have implicit internal linkage.
Fixes #97947
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97969.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clan
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97969
Since in C++ they already have implicit internal linkage.
Fixes #97947
>From 07bd62f97d203bbdb865cd4b1e14cef3ead70c80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carlos Galvez
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:11:54 +0200
Subj
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// The test may fail as time out on windows
+// REQUIRES: system-linux
+
+// RUN: %clang -S -O3 -emit-llvm -o - -x c++ %s | FileCheck %s
-check-prefixes=CHECK,
efriedma-quic wrote:
> gcc does ignore the empty array case for assigning argument registers in C++.
> Compare the two cases here https://godbolt.org/z/j4WP89rE8
Oh, you're right, I didn't actually do any testing myself, I was just assuming
@svs-quic did the right test.
So I guess the previou
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
It looks like MSVC also applies this rule to fastcall.
Maybe put a boolean in the "state" to try to group together the code for
specific conventions, instead of directly checking the CC.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97939
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw)
Changes
See the discussion in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352#discussion_r1657074801
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97965.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clan
https://github.com/dtcxzyw created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97965
See the discussion in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352#discussion_r1657074801
>From 21a8c00e8276f0ea4fa5c52296b257b8d113b947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yingwei Zheng
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 02:
jyu2-git wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Thank you take look!
> Missed one thing, the assignments for boolean flags must be |=, otherwise we
> may miss some combinations.
Are you talking about assignment of following?
HasMapBasePtr = any_of(M, [](c..
Do I need to change to:
HasMapBasePtr |= any_of(M, [](c
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 902fb1b4653d5a23613492406cd5693446f06ab6
6be7eea2a193ca3d92141f62286f779124647acd --
https://github.com/dtcxzyw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94352
>From ff839bef048a65760f4cd0e9abafe11cfebd9362 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yingwei Zheng
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:08:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [RISCV] Add support for getHostCPUFeatures using
hwprobe
C
https://github.com/to268 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79845
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7813,6 +7813,32 @@ Sema::BuildCompoundLiteralExpr(SourceLocation LParenLoc,
TypeSourceInfo *TInfo,
diag::err_variable_object_no_init))
return ExprError();
}
+ } else if (LangOpts.C23 &&
to268 wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c2x -verify %s
+
+/* WG14 N3006: Full
+ * Underspecified object declarations
+ */
+
+struct S1 { int x, y; };// expected-note {{previous definition is
here}}
+union U1 { int a; double b; }; // expected-note {{previous definition
https://github.com/hanickadot approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97952
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1005,14 +1332,22 @@ class InlayHintVisitor : public
RecursiveASTVisitor {
// The sugared type is more useful in some cases, and the canonical
// type in other cases.
auto Desugared = maybeDesugar(AST, T);
-std::string TypeName = Desugared.getAsString(TypeHi
@@ -372,6 +374,292 @@ maybeDropCxxExplicitObjectParameters(ArrayRef Params) {
return Params;
}
+class TypeInlayHintLabelPartBuilder
+: public TypeVisitor {
+ QualType CurrentType;
+ NestedNameSpecifier *CurrentNestedNameSpecifier;
+ ASTContext &Context;
+ StringRef M
https://github.com/mikecrowe edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
>From f6c1a231681092189a621e2bc6af97300b2a7bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:06:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Only expand macros in
modernize-use-std-format/
mikecrowe wrote:
It looks like the tests are failing on Windows because the `%s` in the command
line
```
// RUN: %check_clang_tidy \
// RUN: -std=c++20 %s modernize-use-std-format %t -- \
// RUN: -config="{CheckOptions: {StrictMode: true}}" \
// RUN: -- -isystem %clang_tidy_headers \
// RU
dtcxzyw wrote:
> This patch is motivated by an internal benchmark where there were some cases
> where this helped, though even that case is in some sense artificial.
It is ok to optimize some pattern in proxy apps/benchmarks :)
> Is this a necessary criteria for landing this change?
As recurs
@@ -365,7 +365,12 @@ int DwarfInstructions::stepWithDwarf(A
&addressSpace, pint_t pc,
// Return address is address after call site instruction, so setting IP
to
// that does simulates a return.
- newRegisters.setIP(returnAddress);
+ //
+ // In case
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: NAKAMURA Takumi (chapuni)
Changes
With `system-headers-coverage=false`, functions defined in system headers was
not instrumented but corresponding covmap was emitted. It caused wasting covmap
and profraw
https://github.com/chapuni created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97952
With `system-headers-coverage=false`, functions defined in system headers was
not instrumented but corresponding covmap was emitted. It caused wasting covmap
and profraw.
This change improves:
- Reduce object
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
>From f6c1a231681092189a621e2bc6af97300b2a7bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:06:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Only expand macros in
modernize-use-std-format/
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
>From 4bb4d8258c7d68864b4c01c8f982fa1339e5006b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:25:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a modernize-use-ranges check
---
.../clang-tidy/moderniz
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
>From 7bb1c44fb23a1ec0c90c5ce694cbd7d2245a00a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:25:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a modernize-use-ranges check
---
.../clang-tidy/moderniz
@@ -208,11 +208,22 @@ FormatStringConverter::FormatStringConverter(ASTContext
*ContextIn,
assert(ArgsOffset <= NumArgs);
FormatExpr = llvm::dyn_cast(
Args[FormatArgOffset]->IgnoreImplicitAsWritten());
+
if (!FormatExpr || !FormatExpr->isOrdinary()) {
// Funct
njames93 wrote:
- Added some more functions for boost/range/numeric
- Added support for Reverse range iteration
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
>From ecde6109c040741f6425d3c42464ffaa02f237f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:25:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a modernize-use-ranges check
---
.../clang-tidy/moderniz
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - boost-use-ranges
+
+boost-use-ranges
+
+
+Detects calls to standard library iterator algorithms that could be replaced
+with a boost ranges version instead.
+
+Example
+---
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ auto Iter1 = std::
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - boost-use-ranges
+
+boost-use-ranges
+
+
+Detects calls to standard library iterator algorithms that could be replaced
+with a boost ranges version instead.
EugeneZelenko wrote:
```suggestion
with a Boost
@@ -169,6 +175,12 @@ New checks
Finds initializer lists for aggregate types that could be
written as designated initializers instead.
+- New :doc:`modernize-use-ranges
+ ` check.
+
+ Detects calls to standard library iterator algorithms that could be replaced
+ with a r
@@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ Improvements to clang-tidy
New checks
^^
+- New :doc:`boost-use-ranges
+ ` check.
+
+ Detects calls to standard library iterator algorithms that could be replaced
+ with a boost ranges version instead
EugeneZelenko wrote:
```su
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -ast-dump -fblocks %s | FileCheck -strict-whitespace %s
samolisov wrote:
@vitalybuka Thank you for the suggestion. I've regenerated the test using the
tool and cut the dump to make it a bit shorter.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/samolisov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97164
>From edf0d10b41099068ef49a2d2fe0ce60356d2f2fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Samolysov
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:18:11 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Add a test for move ctor calling for a base
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
>From 56d452478fb2b002898e6b3dfc5e251b42894ca3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:25:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a modernize-use-ranges check
---
.../clang-tidy/moderniz
https://github.com/njames93 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97764
>From 065d343d5ab1706475fe5a1bc3a43e5368d1142b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan James
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:25:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a modernize-use-ranges check
---
.../clang-tidy/moderniz
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97103
>From c784272b3f66ca06be4ab8e72a0963e5ebb6a869 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:40:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] update tests, update code
---
clang/include/clang/Basic
81 matches
Mail list logo