@@ -44,73 +41,16 @@ namespace dataflow {
//
// [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPLL_algorithm
-/// Boolean variables are represented as positive integers.
-using Variable = uint32_t;
+namespace {
martinboehme wrote:
I did something similar: The class commen
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+//===- CNFFormula.h -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92401
>From e902cf2e18208a118f90c341d3e375d2c20cdc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 13:45:57 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][dataflow] Make `CNFFormula` externally
accessi
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
>From 0621608c575d9e4f7da5b08db143dbe88a45745a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:07:06 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Extend the C support.
The IdResolver chain is
vgvassilev wrote:
The bots fail on windows due to `TEST 'Clang ::
CoverageMapping/mcdc-system-headers.cpp' FAILED` which does not seem related to
this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
Pierre-vh wrote:
> > @arsenm Should we use `image` or `private`? We could allow both in the
> > frontend, and only use `private` as the canonical MMRA.
>
> I don't understand why image would imply private. I would just keep at as
> private throughout
I thought image memory = private. It's unc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Siddhartha Mondal (aaronmondal)
Changes
The terminfo dependency introduces a significant nonhermeticity into the build.
It doesn't respect `--no-undefined-version` meaning that it's not a dependency
that ca
https://github.com/aaronmondal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92865
The terminfo dependency introduces a significant nonhermeticity into the build.
It doesn't respect `--no-undefined-version` meaning that it's not a dependency
that can be built with Clang 17+. This forces ma
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
huangqinjin wrote:
gentle ping. The ci failure looks not relevant.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-05-20T22:55:24-07:00
New Revision: e411c88b7223d87520af819fdc012c9dbb46e575
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e411c88b7223d87520af819fdc012c9dbb46e575
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e411c88b7223d87520af819fdc012c9dbb46e575.diff
L
FreddyLeaf wrote:
> `
> [4087704](/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338/commits/40877041618aa8f472f0da7cda06c21f4007a1ec)`
Thanks reminding. Added in 4087704, pls help review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
>From 41fbc18c7a4a26b11bc4b772bbe2e384ad9d9dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddy Ye
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:29:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [X86] Support EGPR for inline assembly.
"jR": explictly enabl
MaskRay wrote:
@ilovepi I just realized that the FatLTO LLVM patch did not incorporate
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153215 . I thought it did... Hope this is not too
late.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
This follows up to SHT_LLVM_LTO (https://reviews.llvm.org/D153215) and
resolves the comment of the FatLTO patch
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146776#4430626
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
https://github.com/MaskRay created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92856
This follows up to SHT_LLVM_LTO (https://reviews.llvm.org/D153215) and
resolves the comment of the FatLTO patch
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146776#4430626
>From fdf70f50de2d51223f3f04b2db4913360ded3469 Mon Sep 17
yamt wrote:
> If we're going to do this, it should probably also work for constants.
for completeness, maybe. i myself have no use cases though.
> Also, I think I'd prefer to sort out the situation with the C++ standard's
> rules for constant merging before we start extending those rules. See
mizvekov wrote:
> Can you try to explain the what the patch does more and describe the
> rationale?
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
@@ -1435,7 +1436,10 @@ class NonTypeTemplateParmDecl final
bool hasDefaultArgument() const { return DefaultArgument.isSet(); }
/// Retrieve the default argument, if any.
- Expr *getDefaultArgument() const { return DefaultArgument.get(); }
+ const TemplateArgumentLoc &get
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1435,7 +1436,10 @@ class NonTypeTemplateParmDecl final
bool hasDefaultArgument() const { return DefaultArgument.isSet(); }
/// Retrieve the default argument, if any.
- Expr *getDefaultArgument() const { return DefaultArgument.get(); }
+ const TemplateArgumentLoc &get
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Can you try to explain the what the patch does more and describe the rationale?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/cyndyishida closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91770
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Cyndy Ishida
Date: 2024-05-20T21:22:24-07:00
New Revision: c9dc52d424b7a264d4bcb29d7f56551304396d7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c9dc52d424b7a264d4bcb29d7f56551304396d7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c9dc52d424b7a264d4bcb29d7f56551304396d7f.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This is an enabler for a future patch.
---
Patch is 26.46 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852.diff
25 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This is an enabler for a future patch.
---
Patch is 26.46 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852.diff
25 Files Affe
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92852
This is an enabler for a future patch.
>From 22964061e46ef0d37904f6c8e757dca9800c5cd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 00:39:55 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] NFCI: use Temp
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91770
>From 291412a203ea60465d4ecae9317f3490c59bfb50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 19:53:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [InstallAPI] add JSON option to pass X arguments
---
.../
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yamt wrote:
> Hmm... I'm not sure this meets our requirements for inclusion as an
> attribute. The semantics of this are pretty opaque, no obvious significant
> motivation/applicability in the base languages, etc. There doesn't seem to be
> any reasonable use case that I can see.
do you mean
https://github.com/4vtomat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Brandon Wu
Date: 2024-05-21T12:04:46+08:00
New Revision: 8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8be079cdddfd628d356d9ddb5ab397ea95fb1030.diff
LO
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
>From 062d7d5017b01fb3afbaffe1a34487cfe36288d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:43:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [RISCV] Bump Zaamo and Zalrsc to version 1.0
The ratified inform
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91556
>From 062d7d5017b01fb3afbaffe1a34487cfe36288d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:43:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Bump Zaamo and Zalrsc to version 1.0
The ratified inform
@@ -1554,13 +1554,13 @@
// CHECK-ZVKT-EXT: __riscv_zvkt 100{{$}}
// Experimental extensions
-// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
-// RUN: -march=rv32i_zaamo0p2 -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 \
4vtomat wrote:
JonChesterfield wrote:
[inline-then-fold-variadics.cpp](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92850/commits/15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632#diff-0a9893e04ae7e0a5692ad93dfb73d6efa992953f7e9eebb68c1a3f4acd457e1e)
is the motivating example for optimisation - simple variadic functions a
https://github.com/4vtomat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92644
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Brandon Wu
Date: 2024-05-21T11:50:04+08:00
New Revision: 64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64aafd6908e3aa36c4504bc10f8d9fc819513f6c.diff
LO
jyknight wrote:
Please update the constraint code list
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#supported-constraint-code-list with any new
codes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 560c2fd3d427a5e2dc2361abde1142f3fda40253
15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632 --
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s -mllvm -expand-variadics-override=disable | Fi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
Replace variadic functions with equivalent functions taking a va_list. This
composes with optimisations like inlining to give zero cost variadics.
Sched
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-05-20T20:32:18-07:00
New Revision: 1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c58208d899285318c89e069268145c85ec33368.diff
LOG:
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//===- SemaRISCV.h --- RISC-V target-specific routines
===//
topperc wrote:
I think header files are supposed to have `-*- C++ -*-` on this line
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92682
__
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92682
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6,17 +6,21 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-ibm-aix -mlong-double-64 -emit-llvm -o - %s
| FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc64-ibm-aix -mlong-double-64 -emit-llvm -o -
%s | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s
+long double input = 0.0L;
@@ -14674,6 +14676,31 @@ static bool TryEvaluateBuiltinNaN(const ASTContext
&Context,
return true;
}
+// Checks that the value x is in the range (-1;-0.5], [0.5; 1)
+static bool isInFrexpResultRange(const llvm::APFloat &x) {
+ llvm::APFloat minusOne(x.getSemantics(), "-1.
https://github.com/JonChesterfield closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jon Chesterfield
Date: 2024-05-21T03:22:20+01:00
New Revision: b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2d7d72ff2408dcc27048e08d50ac719ff03a89e.di
FreddyLeaf wrote:
[4d1ad30](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338/commits/4d1ad3090416cda320c88f1ddc0937b5749e64b4)
moved but not merged. These two constraints will behavior different under
-mattr=+egpr.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/923
https://github.com/FreddyLeaf updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92338
>From 41fbc18c7a4a26b11bc4b772bbe2e384ad9d9dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddy Ye
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:29:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [X86] Support EGPR for inline assembly.
"jR": explictly enabl
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2024-05-20T22:49:53-03:00
New Revision: 4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4cebe5a43ba83eab477358ef4da665b43463bb68.dif
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92385
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-05-21T09:47:05+08:00
New Revision: 8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ce2045be0ce708af0bfce5dc14632fa15dc743a.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 00179e92c147e16de1f7c653f88c8805aef820c1
e04e685a8fbf3e7915a9eaff3798fe77d15aab0c --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Support/LockF
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Support/LockFile
https://github.com/kazutakahirata edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92841
etc (NFC),
>From 4711f9f61fd35f3388f665a396f95951ee4b3f5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 09:10:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use StringRef::find_first_of(char), etc (NFC)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxxabi
Author: Heejin Ahn (aheejin)
Changes
We've decided to change `__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` preprocessor to
`__WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` given that it's more concise.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92840.diff
6 Files Affecte
https://github.com/aheejin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92840
We've decided to change `__USING_WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` preprocessor to
`__WASM_EXCEPTIONS__` given that it's more concise.
>From e04e685a8fbf3e7915a9eaff3798fe77d15aab0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
D
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92604
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Heejin Ahn
Date: 2024-05-20T18:43:13-07:00
New Revision: d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1aca0ae2e0c52298966e35e4312e21045d4c6e4.diff
LO
MaskRay wrote:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-nolock-and-noalloc-attributes/76837/75
contains a discussion about the subproject name.
Do you have opinions? @llvm/pr-subscribers-sanitizer @compnerd @petrhosek
@isanbard
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
_
JonChesterfield wrote:
Dropped the NFC tag from the commit message. The machine code is expected to be
the same or negligibly better, this patch makes some tests more legible for a
different patch. Thanks for the quick review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JonChesterfield edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check that -fcf-protection does not get passed to the device-side
MaskRay wrote:
We also have unsupported-option-gpu.c to test various ignored options for GPU.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88402
_
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
Please don't use "NFC" markings for patches that change the emitted IR, even if
it doesn't significantly impact the resulting assembly in most cases.
That said, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
___
efriedma-quic wrote:
This patch, as proposed, doesn't seem like a good idea: it's very likely to
miscompile user code without any diagnostic. Are you sure you don't want one of
the following?
- A soft-float ABI (-mabi=aapcs-soft)
- Completely forbidding the use of floating-point values (-mgene
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must have a virtual des
rniwa wrote:
Closing this PR in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837,
which has a single consolidated commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92837
Exempt CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) classes with a delete
operation acting on "this" pointer with an appropriate cast from the
requirement that a ref-countable superclass must have a virtual destruct
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/AArch64.cpp (+1-12)
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/aarc
https://github.com/JonChesterfield created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92836
None
>From b08088ddb37d2a03d321e3256ae19328dd7c502e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Chesterfield
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 23:07:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64][NFC] Use ptrmask for vaarg stack align
https://github.com/cachemeifyoucan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NuriAmari wrote:
I've added the check back in, and reverted my custom check. There is too much
going on in https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808 for me to quickly understand
everything, but I don't see an obvious reason the check needed to be removed.
@ahatanaka Please let me know if I'm missing so
efriedma-quic wrote:
Bot is unreliable, so copy-pasting:
> ⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to
> contribute to the repo.
Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account.
See [LLVM
Discourse](https:/
https://github.com/NuriAmari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92331
>From 66ddf609c0e77867ec48c17136fb80d1e482041d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:33:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Run ObjCContractPass in Distributed Thin-LTO Pipeline
Prior t
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
>From 87cfc8234e1294dedc103b9bcd2b7d9d31874c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:24:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Ignore a base class
which has
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92501
>From 87cfc8234e1294dedc103b9bcd2b7d9d31874c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:24:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor] Ignore a base class
which has a
@@ -718,12 +718,16 @@ def ProcessorFeatures {
list AppleA13 = [HasV8_4aOps, FeatureCrypto,
FeatureFPARMv8,
FeatureNEON, FeaturePerfMon,
FeatureFullFP16,
FeatureFP16FML, FeatureSHA3];
+ // Apple A14 a
bcardosolopes wrote:
I encoded the discussion in our clangir.org page, with some speculation on
Aaron's pending replies, happy to change and fix anything. In the future we'll
upstream that too, but for the time being it's here:
https://llvm.github.io/clangir/GettingStarted/coding-guideline.htm
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
.text
#endif
-#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__)
+#if !defined(__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__) && !defined(__wasm__)
aheejin wrote:
Can I land this? Thank you for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92192
__
JonChesterfield wrote:
Aarch64 has a dedicated floating point region in the va_list structure. Is the
intent of this patch to globally disable the use of that, such that clang
should arrange to put floating point values in the stack fallback area instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
> I couldn't find this check you're alluding to, so I added my own. If the
> check does exist, could you point me to it? If not, does mine look
> reasonable? Thanks.
I was answering from my memory, now I have to check. We have this function
`ModuleHasARC` which is used
ltertan wrote:
@TNorthover
The PR mentions no Reviewers, so I'm adding you. Please help me redirect this
if you're not the right person to review this. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92827
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Laurentiu Tertan (ltertan)
Changes
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
---
Full diff:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Laurentiu Tertan (ltertan)
Changes
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/ltertan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92827
This patch adds a new option for AArch64, -mno-va-float which can be used to
disable the generation of code that saves FP in variadic functions
>From 3d6a1b5d0bfff6b7ffb444a3fb6a32ea0faceea8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
