Procedurally, we shouldn't be making other changes at the same time as a
backport, but I'd sure like to see "stdlibc++" replaced with the correct
"libstdc++" (on trunk and branch).
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 19:00 Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org wrote:
> Peanut gallery says:
sthibaul marked 5 inline comments as done.
sthibaul added a comment.
I believe this version handles all the comments.
I could run this with check-all on a linux-amd64 box.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54379
___
cfe-commits maili
sthibaul updated this revision to Diff 174526.
sthibaul edited the summary of this revision.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54379
Files:
lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h
lib/Driver/CMakeLists.txt
lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
Peanut gallery says: I think the one remaining instance of `-std=libc++` in
the tests should be fixed at the same time.
–Arthur
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:52 PM Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Good idea, this LG for a patch release.
>
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 18
Good idea, this LG for a patch release.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 18:48 Shoaib Meenai via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org wrote:
> Could we merge this into 7.0.1? It's a trivial typo fix, and the error
> message could otherwise be confusing to users (someone brought this up in
> IRC a few hou
Could we merge this into 7.0.1? It's a trivial typo fix, and the error message
could otherwise be confusing to users (someone brought this up in IRC a few
hours ago).
From: cfe-commits on behalf of Alex Lorenz
via cfe-commits
Reply-To: Alex Lorenz
Date: Friday, September 7, 2018 at 12:01 PM
phst created this revision.
phst added a reviewer: klimek.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Support remote files (e.g., Tramp) in the Emacs integration for
clang-include-fixer
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54672
Files:
include-fixer/tool/clang-include
cameron.mcinally added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53157#1301992, @hfinkel wrote:
> > Just because FENV_ACCESS can be toggled on that granularity doesn't mean we
> > have to represent it that way. We've previously agreed (I think) that if
> > FENV_ACCESS is enabled anywhere in a fun
v.g.vassilev added a comment.
Ping...
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Quuxplusone updated this revision to Diff 174513.
Quuxplusone added a comment.
Implement `[[clang::maybe_trivially_relocatable]]` along the lines suggested by
@rjmccall. The idea is that there are two levels of "opt-in-ness."
The first level, `[[clang::maybe_trivially_relocatable]]`, means "I wa
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rC347144: [Clang] Add options -fprofile-filter-files and
-fprofile-exclude-files to… (authored by calixte, committed by ).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54600?vs=174281&id=174512#toc
Author: calixte
Date: Sat Nov 17 11:41:39 2018
New Revision: 347144
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347144&view=rev
Log:
[Clang] Add options -fprofile-filter-files and -fprofile-exclude-files to
filter the files to instrument with gcov (after revert
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL346659
sthibaul added a comment.
> In general when structuring your code, the performance penalty for other
> targets when the conditions that can be easily tested are not met should
> pretty much be close to nonexistent. I would suggest keeping that in mind
> when submitting revisions.
I know, as di
sthibaul marked 9 inline comments as done.
sthibaul added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h:283
+Builder.defineMacro("__GLIBC__");
+Builder.defineMacro("__ELF__");
+if (Opts.POSIXThreads)
kristina wrote:
> `__MACH__` and `__HU
Author: dblaikie
Date: Sat Nov 17 10:04:13 2018
New Revision: 347141
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347141&view=rev
Log:
Sink BuryPointer from Clang into LLVM for reuse there
Modified:
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Frontend/Utils
Quuxplusone added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:3811
case ParsedAttr::AT_CXX11NoReturn:
+ case ParsedAttr::AT_TriviallyRelocatable:
return true;
erichkeane wrote:
> A note for future reviewers, after the C++11 spelling is remove
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54246#1301940, @hwright wrote:
> @aaron.ballman I don't actually have the commit bit, can you commit this, or
> are we waiting for further review?
No further review required. I'm happy to commit for you. I'll do it later today
or tom
joerg added a comment.
I don't understand the point here. Why would you want to include
pre-processing-only commands in the compilation database?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
xbolva00 updated this revision to Diff 174505.
xbolva00 added a comment.
Addressed comments, fixed tests
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52835
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.list/p7-0x.cpp
test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.i
Author: brunoricci
Date: Sat Nov 17 05:02:47 2018
New Revision: 347138
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347138&view=rev
Log:
[AST][NFC] Pack CXXDefaultInitExpr
Use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt.
This saves one pointer per CXXDefaultInitExpr.
Modified:
cfe/t
Author: brunoricci
Date: Sat Nov 17 04:56:30 2018
New Revision: 347137
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347137&view=rev
Log:
[AST][NFC] Pack CXXDefaultArgExpr
Use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt.
This saves one pointer per CXXDefaultArgExpr.
Modified:
cfe/tru
Author: brunoricci
Date: Sat Nov 17 04:53:56 2018
New Revision: 347136
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347136&view=rev
Log:
[AST][NFC] Pack CXXThrowExpr
Use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt.
This saves 8 bytes per CXXThrowExpr.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/include/cla
xazax.hun added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1300654, @NoQ wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557#1299736, @xazax.hun wrote:
>
> > It would be great to have a way to extend the list of (possibly non-stl)
> > types to check. But I do understand that the analyzer does not hav
23 matches
Mail list logo