On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 19:29 -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-
users wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm interested in testing a build under a more modern GCC
> built on mips64.
> Eventually I'd like to try the MIPS builtins/intrinsics like
> discussed
> at https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/downloads-mip
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 08:15 -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-
users wrote:
> ...
> OK, thanks. So I was able to compile using the instruction but
> the resulting program is a dud:
>
> $ ./test.exe
> -bash: ./test.exe: No such file or directory
>
> The file is present, its executable, its m
On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 16:29 +0200, Martin Guy via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Hi!
> Those are the idle cores; their clock speed in increased
> when they are active.
>
> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep clock | sort -u
> clock : 2166.00MHz
> clock : 2200.00MHz
> clock : 3400.00
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 02:35 -0500, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-
users wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm looking for the latest GCC for PowerPC. I think I need
> something from this week or last week.
>
> GCC135 has "gcc version 8.2.1 20180813" but I am looking for
> something newer. The other PowerPCs s
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of sparc64-hosted (both
Solaris and Linux) cross toolchains targeting Linux (musl libc)
and Windows (via MinGW-W64).
Linux targets include several flavors of: ARM, Motorola 68000,
MIPS, OpenRISC, PowerPC, RISC-V, S/390, SuperH, and x86-based;
includes
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 23:24 +0200, Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Hi Brice,
>
> On 04-04-20, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Le 04/04/2020 à 20:28, Baptiste Jonglez a écrit :
> > > Following up on a thread from 2018 [1], we still have issue with
> > > counting
> > > the number of CPU, cores and
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 10:26 -0500, Qing Zhao via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to try LLVM, is there any farm machine that is installed
> LLVM 8.0.0 or above?
The gcc102 machine has LLVM 12.0.0 installed now for testing:
$ PATH=/usr/local/llvm/bin:$PATH bash
$ clang --version
ClangBuiltLin
On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 10:32 -0400, Christopher Sean Morrison via
cfarm-users wrote:
> Started yesterday afternoon (EDT). I was on the machine when
> it seemingly went down abruptly (connection terminated, no
> hang, precisely as I did a file-save but probably
> coincidental), then a brief no-respo
On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 10:34 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> ...
>
> The /home directory is mounted from an external USB-C NVMe
> drive because the internal storage is quite limited. Note that
> it does run at USB2 speeds because there is not kernel support
> *y
On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 14:02 -0500, Zach van Rijn wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 10:34 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-
> users wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > The /home directory is mounted from an external USB-C NVMe
> > drive because the internal storage is quite limited
Please be advised that gcc102 (sparc64) is currently offline and
there is no estimate for when it will be available again.
During the course of routine maintenance (package/kernel update),
the system did not survive a reboot. The issue is below the OS.
The system is able to recognize the existenc
On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 11:13 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Please be advised that gcc102 (sparc64) is currently offline
> and there is no estimate for when it will be available again.
The system is online again and is expected to remain stable. This
appears to have been a tra
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 05:40 +0200, Christian Jullien via cfarm-
users wrote:
> Many thanks team!!
>
> I noticed an issue with x86_64 support
>
> gcc104 (homebrew):~ jullien$ cat foo.c
> #include
> int
> main() {
> printf("Hello World\n");
> }
> gcc104 (homebrew):~ jullien$ gcc -arch x86_64 foo
On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:17:27 -0500 Christian Jullien wrote ---
> Currently, TinyCC, the super fast C compiler I modestly contribute on, works
> with limitations on M1 but only with x86_64 emulation.
> We hope to have a native M1 port as TinyCC has already an aarch64 backend.
>
> U
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 10:00 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> ...
>
> Rosetta is installed now.
>
> gcc104 (homebrew):~ zv$ gcc -arch x86_64 foo.c -o foo
> gcc104 (homebrew):~ zv$ file foo
> foo: Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
> gcc104 (homebrew):~ zv$
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:01:10 -0500 Pierre Muller via cfarm-users wrote
---
>Hello,
>
>I suspect that the one user is me,
> should I disable completely all checks using rosetta
> until you find a solution for that problem?
>
> I apologize for the inconvenience.
No; plea
On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 17:29 +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>
> Le 24/10/2022 à 17:04, Zach van Rijn a écrit :
> > ...
>
> > I hope that your tests are not interrupted when I clear the
> > cache. I'll do this once every day or two until a better
> > solution can be found.
> >
> > ...
>
> It might
On Sun, 2022-10-30 at 21:43 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 17:29 +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >
> > > ...
>
> > I've just cleared the cache:
> >
> > gcc104:~ root# ./rosetta_chec
During planned software updates today, this machine did not come
back online after being rebooted.
As it needs to be fixed in person, I do not have an ETA for when
I will be able to do this. At worst, it will be Monday next week.
At best, possibly today, but definitely not this weekend.
User data
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:05:01 -0600 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote
---
> During planned software updates today, this machine did not come
> back online after being rebooted.
It is online now.
The root cause is that the network interface did not come up on its own afte
Please be advised that gcc102 (sparc64) is, once again, offline
and there is no estimate for when it will be available.
The current situation is:
* "watchdog: BUG: soft lockup" at idle, same kernel as had been
somewhat stable before. Once enough CPUs are locked, there is
no possibility
On Sun, 2022-11-27 at 17:09 -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Please be advised that gcc102 (sparc64) is, once again, offline
> and there is no estimate for when it will be available.
It's online with a new kernel, but I cannot make promises about
stability. It seem
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 11:35 +0100, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Just got this:
> Message from syslogd@gcc102 at Nov 30 04:31:20 ...
> kernel:[47393.509723] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2
> stuck for 48s! [ppc2:203070]
>
> Can I do anything to help figuring out the problem?
Not sur
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:45:21 -0600 Pierre Muller wrote ---
>
>
> At least 'ppc2' and 'fpmake' are most probably executable on
> my user account that are generated by my cron jobs.
>
>
> Maybe it would be wise to check if the machine is stable if my cron jobs are
> disabled.
I
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 08:28 -0500, Marc Feeley via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Is there an Apple M1 based machine available? In the past I
> used gcc304 with ssh on port 2409, but that is not responding.
gcc103.fsffrance.org : Linux on M1
https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/news/38#
gcc104.fsffrance.or
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 23:22 -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Zach van Rijn wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 21:21 -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> ...those panics during early boot, strongly suggest bad RAM as
> Bruno Haible suggested.
I agree it is likely a hardware issue. The sy
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 12:38 -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 23:22 -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> > ...
>
> 16 cores and 64GB memory is probably OK for the farm for now,
> and I will replace the defective module(s) early next year.
Next ye
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 15:42 +0100, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users
wrote:
> ...
>
> It still seems that there are CPU lockup :-(
>
> Pierre
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/muller/pas/trunk-svn-
> github/svn-fpcsrc/compiler'
> muller@gcc102:~/pas/trunk/svn-fpcsrc/compiler$
> Message from sy
On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 09:09 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:12:06AM -0600, Zach van Rijn via
> cfarm-users wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 15:42 +0100, Pierre Muller via cfarm-
> > users
> > wrote:
> > > ...
>
On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 11:01 -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> ...
>
> I can cover the cost of a T4-2 (somehow cheaper than a T3-2
> now), however for anything else I'll need some help. My opinion
> is that a T5-2 or later would be better. A T7-2, these can get
This (gcc103) machine is temporarily offline again due to a failed upgrade.
I'll try to repair it tomorrow but it may take until Monday.
Side note: the SPARC T4-2 (to replace gcc102) is still being set up. It's
racked and powered, just not accepting any of the 18 different hard disks I've
put
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 16:38:49 -0600 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote
---
> This (gcc103) machine is temporarily offline again due to a failed upgrade.
>
> I'll try to repair it tomorrow but it may take until Monday.
The gcc103 machine is online again. Sorry for t
I am planning to upgrade the memory in cfarm105/cfarm106
tomorrow (32 --> 64 GB each), at approximately 20:00 UTC.
If successful, expected downtime is 30 minutes. Otherwise I will
revert the change and it should be back online within an hour.
___
cfarm-
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:52:58 -0500 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote
---
> I am planning to upgrade the memory in cfarm105/cfarm106
> tomorrow (32 --> 64 GB each), at approximately 20:00 UTC.
>
> If successful, expected downtime is 30 minutes. Otherwise I will
>
On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 17:04 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> ...
>
> I have several spares (from the T3-2) that I think will work
> and will try them tomorrow.
Not compatible.
Took it out for repair and will order new risers. Hopefully
squared away in the next two wee
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 13:26:37 -0500 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote
---
> On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 17:04 -0500, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I have several spares (from the T3-2) that I think will work
> > and will
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 13:27 -0500, Sean McGovern via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [seanmcg@gcc1-power7 Projects]$ df -h | grep /home
> /dev/md41.6T 1.5T 44G 98% /home
>
> For such a large disk, this is very full.
> I know I am not an administrator, but can I ask that users
> clean th
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:32 +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users
wrote:
> Il 06/03/24 20:31, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 13:27 -0500, Sean McGovern via cfarm-
> > users
> > wrote:
> > I did a quick check, but did not log in as roo
On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 20:36 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-
users wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 20:29, Aleksey Cheusov via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> > Can any one please fix broken clang++ on cfarm103?
> > ...
>
> None of these GCC installations include any C++ headers. Some
> of them have libst
On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 13:31 -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> hello zv 🌊,
>
> hey heads up. the available space on the m1 is about maxed.
> i'll be the first to say that i am one of the primary
> offenders of the storage use with a home directory ~ 10gb,
> there's another user is using ~ 22gb. and on th
On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 20:57 +1000, Stephen Gregoratto via cfarm-
users wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm interested in validating that Zig can build from source on
> on 64-bit Sparc systems, but the only Sparc machines still up
> are running Solaris.
> ...
>
> Unless cfarm202 comes back online, would it be po
On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 10:05 -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
wrote:
> During planned software updates today, this machine did not
> come back online after being rebooted.
I did more updates today and the machine did not come back up.
> As it needs to be fixed in person, I do not ha
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:37:48 -0500 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote
---
> On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 10:05 -0600, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> > During planned software updates today, this machine did not
> > come back online after being rebooted.
>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 04:08:00 -0600 Bruno Haible
wrote ---
> ...
> Could you please also mount /Volumes/STORAGE again? It's the big disk
> that we're recommended to use because / has only limited capacity.
Done.
___
cfarm-users mailing list
c
Approximately 2024-10-30, cfarm104 became inaccessible for an unknown reason.
I still had a root session so I didn't notice it until today.
cfarm104:~ root# uptime
17:58 up 295 days, 6:48, 1 user, load averages: 0.98 1.01 1.03
It's been rebooted and should be available again.
On Sun, 2024-12-29 at 23:55 -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-
users wrote:
> On 12/29/24 19:51, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote:
> > ...
>
> Was this one incident or multiple incidents? By the same user
> or multiple accounts? Long-standing or new accounts?
>
>
On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 12:51 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:46 PM Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users
> wrote:
> >
...
> Forgive my ignorance... when you say "crypto-related," do you
> mean just "cryptocurrency" or "mining"
Dear CFarm User,
It has come to our attention that Compile Farm resources have
(in general) been abused in pursuit of cryptocurrency mining.
This is a reminder that any non-testing non-development related
computation or usage is not allowed and will result in temporary
suspension or permanent re
On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 13:52 +1100, Stephen Gregoratto wrote:
> Hi Zach,
>
> On Sat Nov 9, 2024 at 11:04 AM AEDT, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-
> users wrote:
> > P.S. cfarm105-106 (sparc64) should be online next week; I'll
> > announce it.
>
> Is this still happen
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 17:58 +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 18/02/25 15:39, Zach van Rijn wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 11:32 +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-u...
> >
>
> but it's run in a local script that does for every host
>
> ssh $host wget blablabla
>
> and
>
> $ ssh cfarm104 'ech
50 matches
Mail list logo
