Re: [cfarm-users] Admin requests

On 21 May 2017 at 19:07, Daniel Santos via cfarm-users wrote: > The instructions for requesting a new account > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm currently states > > >How to Get Involved? > >If you are working on a piece of free software (GCC or any other >GPL, BSD, MIT, ...) an

Re: [cfarm-users] Where are the mailing list archives located?

On 14 September 2017 at 05:23, Sergio Durigan Junior via cfarm-users wrote: > On Wednesday, September 13 2017, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > >> I'm having trouble finding the mailing list archive and the mailing >> list sign-up page from the web pages. >> >> The CFarm wiki page (https://g

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:01, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: > I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need > AIX. It's nice of IBM to donate machines, but we need them running > linux, netbsd or freebsd. I don't advertise my work here, and nor > would I expect it to be pre-i

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 11 October 2017 at 15:01, CM Graff via cfarm-users > wrote: >> I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need >> AIX. It's nice of IBM to donate machines, but we need them running >> linux, netbsd or freebsd. I don't adve

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:23, Martin Jambor via cfarm-users wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:01:38AM -0500, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: >> I believe the problem is that very few of us actually want or need >> AIX. > > Why would that be the problem? Or even a problem? > >> It's ni

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:29, CM Graff wrote: >> I can install GNU/Linux and BSDs on commodity hardware in a VM, > Very few of us need more VMs. And by that logic one could test AIX > inside of a VM. Are you sure about that? > I understand that corporate loyalty is important in > these strange tim

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:41, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: > You guys really over-reacted about this. Says the guy who waded into a thread about an OS he never uses, complaining about thousands and thousands of dollars worth of gear made available to anyone, no matter how dumb their attitude. _

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 15:53, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.10.11 at 15:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: >> On 11 October 2017 at 15:41, CM Graff via cfarm-users >> wrote: >> > You guys really over-reacted about this. >> >> Says the guy wh

Re: [cfarm-users] Installing emacs on GCC119/AIX

On 11 October 2017 at 16:22, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: > I saw no mention of interest in getting gcc to work properly on > FreeBSD again. Because you posted in a thread about emacs on AIX. Maybe you should discuss problems with GCC on FreeBSD on the GCC mailing lists, not here. ___

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc111 running AIX wtth gcc-4.8.1 does not have versions of mpfr, mpc of gmp capable of rebuilding gcc-4.8.1

On 12 October 2017 at 19:16, CM Graff via cfarm-users wrote: > gcc111 uses gcc-4.8.1 so as an experiment I performed the following test: > > > wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8.1/gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz > gunzip gcc-4.8.1.tar.gz > tar -xf gcc-4.8.1.tar > cd gcc-4.8.1 > ./configure --prefix="${HOME}

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On 19 February 2018 at 19:49, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We are trying to reproduce an issue reported on Fedora 28 ppc64-le. I > don't know the version of GCC on Fedora 28 at the moment. It's currently a recent GCC 8.0.1 snapshot.

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On 19 February 2018 at 20:17, Andreas Schwab via cfarm-users wrote: > On Feb 19 2018, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > >> Compile appears OK but link fails: >> >> /opt/cfarm/gcc7rc2/bin/g++ -o cryptest.exe -DNDEBUG -g2 -O3 -fPIC >> -pthread -pipe adhoc.o test.o bench1.o bench2.o validat

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On 19 February 2018 at 22:15, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: >>> I used a GNUmakefile: >>> >>> CXX=/opt/cfarm/gcc7rc2/bin/g++ make -j 20 >>> >>> Nothing special, as far as I know. Just using the latest compiler. That's not the latest compiler. It's not even an officially released compil

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112/ppc64-le, and undefined reference to __cxa_thread_atexit_impl

On 20 February 2018 at 12:21, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> ... That is special. /opt/cfarm is not installed as an alternate system compiler. It's not even the latest compiler. If you choose to override the defaults and ref

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc67: new processor AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with Radeon Vega Graphics

On 14 March 2018 at 12:43, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users wrote: > Am I the only one who cannot reach gcc67 currently? Works fine for me. > When I try to log into gcc67, the SSH server responds, > but refuses all my keys. What could cause this behavior? Trying to use a DSA key with a client th

[cfarm-users] peko, please 'nice' your jobs

I can't remember ever using gcc112 when it wasn't running several jobs for "peko", all run without nice. Please remember these are shared machines, and running jobs back-to-back all day, every day doesn't seem necessary. ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfar

Re: [cfarm-users] peko, please 'nice' your jobs

On 26 March 2018 at 15:15, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > [resent with correct from] > >>>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users >>>>>> writes: > > > I can't remember ever using gcc112 when it wasn't running severa

Re: [cfarm-users] peko, please 'nice' your jobs

On 26 March 2018 at 15:19, Stefan Ring wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users > wrote: >> I can't remember ever using gcc112 when it wasn't running several jobs >> for "peko", all run without nice. >> >> Plea

[cfarm-users] Updating gcc70 to supported version of NetBSD

gcc70 is running NetBSD 5.1 which is no longer supported, and can't even build GCC. I plan to update it to the latest stable version, 7.1, unless anybody objects in the next day or two. ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https

Re: [cfarm-users] Updating gcc70 to supported version of NetBSD

Hmm, I seem to have lost root access to that machine (which I was given by Laurent when netbsd 5.1 was installed back in 2011). On 25 May 2018 at 20:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > gcc70 is running NetBSD 5.1 which is no longer supported, and can't > even build GCC. > > I plan to update it to the la

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc112 /home 100% full - clean up NOW

On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 02:52, Ville Voutilainen via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 24 June 2018 at 04:43, Ville Voutilainen > wrote: > > On 24 June 2018 at 04:35, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users > > wrote: > >> Please clean up your home directory on gcc112. The home filesystem is > >> 100% full. If

Re: [cfarm-users] Updating gcc70 to supported version of NetBSD

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, 18:22 Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2018-05-25 20:24:54 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hmm, I seem to have lost root access to that machine (which I was > > given by

Re: [cfarm-users] Updating gcc70 to supported version of NetBSD

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, 23:45 Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On 2018-07-10 18:59:51 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, 18:22 Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users, < > > > There are no BSD machines any longer. > > > > There are, but only V

Re: [cfarm-users] Updating gcc70 to supported version of NetBSD

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, 16:01 Noah Misch via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:54:02AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users > wrote: > > On 2018-07-11 07:37:05 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > See the notes for gcc76. > > > > I still don't unde

Re: [cfarm-users] Enable one ISA for my code, and another ISA for GCC code?

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 11:33, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > > I'm catching a SIGILL on POWER7 ppc64-le machine. I compiled the > source with -mcpu=power8 so I could enable some builtins I may need. > Use of the builtins is guarded at runtime. (This is the classic distro > model, where mo

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC111 filesystem is very slow

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 04:36, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:53 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:46 AM Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > The filesystem on GCC111 seems very slow. Unpacking a tarball takes > >

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC111 filesystem is very slow

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 10:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 04:36, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:53 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:46 AM Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 nearly out of disk space in /tmp/ (94% full, 115MB free)

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 10:56, Peter Maydell via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hi; the gcc110 compile farm machine has a separately mounted /tmp/ > filesystem, which is currently 94% full (and which causes some test > cases I have to fail because they can't create files in /tmp/). > Could people using tha

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 nearly out of disk space in /tmp/ (94% full, 115MB free)

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 11:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 10:56, Peter Maydell via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > Hi; the gcc110 compile farm machine has a separately mounted /tmp/ > > filesystem, which is currently 94% full (and which causes some test > > cases I have to fail

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 nearly out of disk space in /tmp/ (94% full, 115MB free)

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 10:04, Tomas Härdin via cfarm-users wrote: > > ons 2019-03-27 klockan 09:01 +0100 skrev Martin Guy via cfarm-users: > > They probably didn't even know that their work had filled /tmp so > > thanks for making this known. > > > > To make this less likely to happen in future (o

Re: [cfarm-users] SSH key fingerprints for gcc farm machine

On Mon, 6 May 2019, 06:11 Martin Guy via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On 05/05/2019, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 2:55 PM Olly Betts via cfarm-users > > wrote: > >> But even a list on an https protected web page seems better tha

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, 06:56 Assaf Gordon via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On 2019-07-02 10:19 p.m., Christian Jullien wrote: > > Thank you for this upgrade but what about gcc? > > TL;DR > gcc-8.3.0 is now available on gcc302 as: > > /usr/local/bin/x86_64-

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, 05:21 Christian Jullien via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Thank you for this upgrade but what about gcc? > > obsd$ uname -a > OpenBSD obsd.my.domain 6.5 GENERIC.MP#3 amd64 > > From this page https://www.openbsd.org/65.html I read that available gcc

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 22:00, tkoenig--- via cfarm-users wrote: > > > You can use also "sha512 -r file" which has the same output as > > sha512sum. > > Thanks for the tip, but rather than edit a script by hand > (not knowing what I exactly what I am doing) I think I will > simply wait until these p

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc10 home disk full

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 10:45, Pierre Muller via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks to a recent reboot, > gcc10 is running correctly again. > > Nevertheless, the home disk (1.8Tb) seems full. > I wiped out 17Gb of old data, but the > available disk space is already down to 2.5Gb again ...

Re: [cfarm-users] Best BSD machine for a gcc test?

On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 19:15, tkoenig--- via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hi, > > to test a gcc development branch on a BSD machine (for now, any of the > variants would do), what would be the best machine to run a full gcc > bootstrap on? Define best. gcc303 should work fine. _

Re: [cfarm-users] Boostrapping gcc on gcc303

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, 13:00 tkoenig--- via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently despairing of being able to bootstrap gcc on gc303 > (a FreeBSD machine). > > The installed gcc does not work because it is too old. > > Using clang instead, I found that tha

Re: [cfarm-users] Boostrapping gcc on gcc303

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 13:40, tkoenig--- via cfarm-users wrote: > > [re-sending to the list, the first one was bounced] > > Am 17.10.20 um 14:31 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > > > > > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, 13:00 tkoenig--- via cfarm-users, > > wrote: > >

Re: [cfarm-users] Boostrapping gcc on gcc303

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 19:44, Thomas König wrote: > > Am 17.10.20 um 20:11 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > > Are you sure that's not also the problem you had trying to build GCC? > > GCC requires GNU Make, so be sure to use gmake to build gcc. > > If you'd read the PR, you would have known the answer.

Re: [cfarm-users] AIX gcc119 planned outage Monday, October 12

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 19:53, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users wrote: > > gcc119 will be offline for 4-6 hours on Monday, October 12, beginning > at 0600 CUT/GMT for a reconfiguration of the hypervisor of the system > on which it is hosted. The /scratch disk is only writable by root, so I can't recr

Re: [cfarm-users] AIX gcc119 planned outage Monday, October 12

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 15:39, David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:33 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 19:53, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users > > wrote: > > > > > > gcc119 will be offline for 4-6 hours on Monday, October 12, beginning > > > at 0600 CUT/GMT for

Re: [cfarm-users] Moving on

Or see the email headers, which include: List-Unsubscribe: , So you can just send an email to cfarm-users-requ...@lists.tetaneutral.net with the subject "unsubscribe". On Tu

Re: [cfarm-users] Install libtool on GCC119

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, 00:05 Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 9:36 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > ... > > gcc119:cryptopp$ command -v libtool > > gcc119:cryptopp$ > > > > It looks like libtool is missing. > > > > Would it be pos

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:30, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'm trying a git pull. When I use https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/: > > $ git pull > fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/': > Problem with the SSL CA c > ert (path? access rights

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:30, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'm trying a git pull. When I use https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/: > > $ git pull > fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/': > Problem with the SSL CA c > ert (path? access rights

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:30, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I'm trying a git pull. When I use https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/: > > > > $ git pull > > fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/we

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:37, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Mär 30 2022, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:30, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > > wrote: > >> When I try git://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/: > >> &

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to git pull on gcc112

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:37, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > > On Mär 30 2022, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 02:30, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > > >

Re: [cfarm-users] New OS requirements on the farm?

On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 06:32 Christian Jullien via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > First of all, I would like to send VERY BIG thanks to people giving us > access to this large collection of machines. > > I personally do very lightweight tasks testing tcc C compiler on the

Re: [cfarm-users] Two problems on the gcc119 machine

On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 21:44, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 2022-09-18 07:14, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote: > > On the gcc119 (AIX 7.2) machine, there are two problems: > > Should I be porting anythnig to AIX? Does anyone use it any more? > > Simple code like this doesn't compil

Re: [cfarm-users] AIX portability

On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 04:19, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users wrote: > > On 2022-09-20 14:29, Bruno Haible wrote: > > This is on gcc119.fsffrance.org (AIX 7.2). About which AIX and GCC versions > > were you complaining? > > I neglected to mention: there are two areas in the header file > which defin

Re: [cfarm-users] Missing "make" on gcc210 or gcc211.fsffrance.org / or wrong autoconf - any idea?

On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 10:49 Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Dear cfarm users, > > I have attempted to compile my code on gcc211. > > ./configure > runs well. > > But there is some problem, that autoconf macro: > > @SET_MAKE@ > > Does not work properly.

Re: [cfarm-users] Missing "make" on gcc210 or gcc211.fsffrance.org / or wrong autoconf - any idea?

On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 12:00 Bruno Haible, wrote: > Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > May be that this is a bug of autoconf. > N.B. Jaroslav said that, not me :) ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listin

Re: [cfarm-users] Unable to build clang on gcc220 x86_64-openbsd test machine

On Sat, 20 May 2023, 22:01 Pierre Muller via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > > > Le 18/05/2023 à 19:55, mirabilos a écrit : > > Pierre Muller via cfarm-users dixit: > > > >> LLVM ERROR: out of memory > > > >> Is the fact that it is not possible to build clang on openbsd

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, 03:20 Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Bruno Haible via cfarm-users writes: > > >Because in the current state, it means that after creating a tarball of > any > >package that uses a 'configure' script, I need to wait 42 minutes unti

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 05:46, Noah Misch via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 07:39:08PM -0700, Daniel B. Widdis via cfarm-users > wrote: > > Any chance of getting git installed? > > > > $ rpm -qa | grep git > > git-core-2.38.3-1.ppc > > git-2.38.3-1.ppc > > git-core-doc-2.38.3-1.no

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 /home is now 98% full

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 15:20, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:32 +0100, Martin Guy via cfarm-users > wrote: > > Il 06/03/24 20:31, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users ha scritto: > > > On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 13:27 -0500, Sean McGovern via cfarm- > > > users > > > wrote: >

Re: [cfarm-users] privacy

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024, 14:05 Bruno Haible, wrote: > > Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > It would not be straightforward to track all SSH access on the farm, both > > > for privacy reasons and technical reasons (the farm has very diverse > > > systems, and some people run jobs via cron). > > > > What are

Re: [cfarm-users] privacy

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 at 20:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2024, 14:05 Bruno Haible, wrote: > > > > Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > It would not be straightforward to track all SSH access on the farm, > > > > both > > > > for privacy reasons and technical reasons (the farm has very d

Re: [cfarm-users] Aging inactive cfarm users?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024, 13:12 Martin Guy via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Il 14/04/24 13:46, Jonathan Wakely via cfarm-users ha scritto: > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2024, 12:15 Baptiste Jonglez via cfarm-users, > > wrote: > > > > On 09-04-

Re: [cfarm-users] cfarm103: broken clang++-16

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 20:29, Aleksey Cheusov via cfarm-users wrote: > > Can any one please fix broken clang++ on cfarm103? > > 0 ~>cat ~/tmp/2.cc > #include > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > std::cout << "Hello"; > return 0; > } > > 0 ~>clang++ -o ~/tmp/2 ~/tmp/2.cc > /home/cheus

Re: [cfarm-users] Install podman on gcc120.fsffrance.org

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer via cfarm-users > wrote: > > Would be possible to install podman on gcc120.fsffrance.org > > Wow, that brings in all kinds of container and selinux stuff. But, > i

Re: [cfarm-users] rsync on AIX?

On Sun, 18 Aug 2024, 04:21 Martin Guy via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On 8/17/24 22:51, David Edelsohn via cfarm-users wrote: > > Please use the > > > > --rsync-path=COMMAND > > > > command line option to the rsync command to choose the remote rsync > > command to in

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:00, Simon Josefsson via cfarm-users wrote: > > Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users > writes: > > > Is anyone doing CI-style automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts, > > or > > more generally on systems where all you've got to play with are SSH, > > sh/bash, > > and

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 08:41, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users wrote: > > Playing with my own build-on-everything script I've found some issues with > several systems, when doing things manually I've just skipped over them but > the script is less forgiving... > > cfarm23 has an ancient clang instal

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 09:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 08:41, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > Playing with my own build-on-everything script I've found some issues with > > several systems, when doing things manually I've just skipped over them but > > th

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 10:21, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users wrote: > > Bruno Haible writes: > > >cfarm119 has two compilers installed: > > - A GCC that works, in /opt/freeware/bin. > > - An IBM derivate of clang, named ibm-clang and ibm-clang++, > >in /opt/IBM/openxlC/17.1.1/bin. But it is

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 10:40, Peter Gutmann wrote: > > Jonathan Wakely writes: > > >>cfarm210 is running an ancient version of SSH that requires all sorts of > >>algorithm downgrades to work. This isn't a big deal security-wise, but it > >>does mean adding a pile of overrides to the client-side

Re: [cfarm-users] Automated deployment across multiple cfarm hosts

On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 10:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 10:40, Peter Gutmann > wrote: > > > > Jonathan Wakely writes: > > > > >>cfarm210 is running an ancient version of SSH that requires all sorts of > > >>algorithm downgrades to work. This isn't a big deal security-

Re: [cfarm-users] Is anywhere on compile farm installed GCC-15? GCC 14 seems to have severe issue.

On Sun, 29 Sept 2024 at 23:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Sun, 29 Sept 2024, 17:22 Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users, > wrote: >> >> >> It is really a trap when something expected to work stops working, after new >> GCC release. >> And everything still works fine on your own computer. > > >

Re: [cfarm-users] Is anywhere on compile farm installed GCC-15? GCC 14 seems to have severe issue.

On Sun, 29 Sept 2024, 17:22 Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > > It is really a trap when something expected to work stops working, after > new GCC release. > And everything still works fine on your own computer. > Well the code has undefined behaviour,

Re: [cfarm-users] New user - experimenting with AIX builds

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, 22:44 Freya Starshade via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > ok, that should work. We're going to at least try to get a more recent > gcc on 111, will be in /opt/cfarm/lhvn/packages/LHVNgnuCC1030 if we can > get that version to build > I'm not sure why

Re: [cfarm-users] Editing the CompileFarm wiki page

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, 20:05 Jonathan Wakely, wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, 19:40 Martin Guy via cfarm-users, < > cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > >> I was thinking of updating https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm to >> remove riscv from the hardware with list (or change it to riscv3

Re: [cfarm-users] Editing the CompileFarm wiki page

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, 19:40 Martin Guy via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > I was thinking of updating https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm to > remove riscv from the hardware with list (or change it to riscv32) and > add a project (app portability to everything) but, thou

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024, 17:46 Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2024-12-29 at 23:55 -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm- > users wrote: > > On 12/29/24 19:51, Zach van Rijn via cfarm-users wrote: > > > ... > > > > Was this one incident or multiple incid

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Fri, 3 Jan 2025, 01:40 Jacob Bachmeyer, wrote: > On 1/2/25 03:43, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, 02:55 Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users, < > cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > >> On 1/1/25 19:23, Paul Eggert wrote: >> > On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-use

Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, 02:55 Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On 1/1/25 19:23, Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 2025-01-01 16:32, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote: > >> Perhaps a combination of nice(1) and ulimit(1) would be suitable? > > > > Not for mining