Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 runaway processes

2020-05-05 Thread Jonas Maebe via cfarm-users
On 05/05/2020 02:00, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Thanks for letting us know. You mean gcc111 though, a very different > machine :-) Oops, indeed :) > It won't help to have runaways of course, but the disk system was slow > long before :-) Okay. At least the 128GB of ram alleviate it a bit by c

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc110 runaway processes

2020-05-04 Thread Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
Hi! On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 05:41:55PM +0200, Jonas Maebe via cfarm-users wrote: > On gcc110, there are two seemingly runaway processes that have been > running since November last year, and that are both listed as using 64% > of CPU in top(as): > > ptc 8126816 1.3 0.0 8704 9812 pts/0 A

[cfarm-users] gcc110 runaway processes

2020-05-03 Thread Jonas Maebe via cfarm-users
Hi, On gcc110, there are two seemingly runaway processes that have been running since November last year, and that are both listed as using 64% of CPU in top(as): ptc 8126816 1.3 0.0 8704 9812 pts/0 A Nov 12 837807:54 /home/ptc/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.24.3/bin/perl t/10bytes.t a