Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-02 Thread mirabilos via cfarm-users
David Edelsohn via cfarm-users dixit: >IBM Open XL C/C++ now is based on LLVM Technology. Okaaay. >I did not install the previous IBM XL C/C++. Is there a chance that can be kept (installed)? This is useful for portability testing (and, from a GCC compile farm PoV, (re‑)bootstrapping testing).

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-02 Thread Paul Eggert via cfarm-users
On 10/1/23 10:10, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: No doubt Clang will define __xlC__ but fail to compile a program written for xlC, like one using __vcipher, __vcipherlast, __vshasigmaw and __vshasigmad (AES and SHA intrinsics). There are quite a few changes in Open XL C/C++ for AIX 17.1.

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-02 Thread David Edelsohn via cfarm-users
IBM Open XL C/C++ now is based on LLVM Technology. I did not install the previous IBM XL C/C++. David On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:12 PM Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM mirabilos via cfarm-users > wrote: > > > > Noah Mis

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread Segher Boessenkool via cfarm-users
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 04:36:49PM +, mirabilos via cfarm-users wrote: > Noah Misch via cfarm-users dixit: > > >/opt/IBM/openxlC/17.1.1/bin/ibm-clang_r is the new system's XLC. > > Huh, so it’s also “just another LLVM+Clang”, not the old xlC? No, it is openxlc. It is not just standard LLVM.

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM mirabilos via cfarm-users wrote: > > Noah Misch via cfarm-users dixit: > > >/opt/IBM/openxlC/17.1.1/bin/ibm-clang_r is the new system's XLC. > > Huh, so it’s also “just another LLVM+Clang”, not the old xlC? It sounds like it. No doubt Clang will define __xlC__ but

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread mirabilos via cfarm-users
Noah Misch via cfarm-users dixit: >/opt/IBM/openxlC/17.1.1/bin/ibm-clang_r is the new system's XLC. Huh, so it’s also “just another LLVM+Clang”, not the old xlC? Sic transit gloria mundi, //mirabilos -- exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. just about the worst way yo

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM Noah Misch wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:27:28AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users > wrote: > > I _thought_ GCC119 had IBM's XLC/C++ installed. > > > > gcc119:$ command -v xlC > > gcc119:$ > > > > And: > > > > gcc119:$ find /opt -name xlC >

Re: [cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread Noah Misch via cfarm-users
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:27:28AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users wrote: > I _thought_ GCC119 had IBM's XLC/C++ installed. > > gcc119:$ command -v xlC > gcc119:$ > > And: > > gcc119:$ find /opt -name xlC > gcc119:$ > > Is that no longer the case? A new AIX 7.3 box replac

[cfarm-users] GCC119 and XLC/C++

2023-10-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton via cfarm-users
Hi Everyone, I _thought_ GCC119 had IBM's XLC/C++ installed. gcc119:$ command -v xlC gcc119:$ And: gcc119:$ find /opt -name xlC gcc119:$ Is that no longer the case? Thanks in advance, Jeff ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@li