Thanks!
On Tue 15 Feb 2022 at 11:51, Paul Hua wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> > Any chance to install rsync? I am using it to sync sources - faster and
> more efficiently than scp them.
> >
> $ which rsync
> /usr/local/bin/rsync
>
> Note: rsync configure with --disable-xxhash --disable-lz4, cause some
> pack
Hi,
>
> Any chance to install rsync? I am using it to sync sources - faster and more
> efficiently than scp them.
>
$ which rsync
/usr/local/bin/rsync
Note: rsync configure with --disable-xxhash --disable-lz4, cause some
package is missing. A fully supported version will be in CLFS-2.4.
_
Hi,
Any chance to install rsync? I am using it to sync sources - faster and
more efficiently than scp them.
Thanks in advance,
luben
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:41 AM Bruno Haible via cfarm-users <
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote:
> > on these machines, terminals are messed up.
> >
> >
> on these machines, terminals are messed up.
>
> TERM is set to xterm-256colors (standard for KDE).
Here's a local fix:
1) Save the attached file (taken from an Ubuntu machine).
2) $ mkdir $HOME/.terminfo
$ tic -o $HOME/.terminfo xterm-256color.ubuntu
Bruno
# Reconstructed via infocmp
Hi,
on these machines, terminals are messed up.
This is what "emacs hello.c" displays when going in via ssh
from a KDE console:
5:60m#include 5:89m
5:28mint 5:21mmain()
{
printf (5:89m"Hello, world!\n");
}
vi is similar.
TERM is set to xterm-256colors (standard for KDE).
Best rega
Paul Hua via cfarm-users writes:
>Would you please provide test.c for debugging.
Sure:
cat > test.c
#include
^D
Peter.
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
>
> First issue :-). Looks like clang is present but not set up:
>
> > gcc test.c
> > clang test.c
> In file included from test.c:1:
> In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:394:
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:227:
> In file included from /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:23:
>
> Where to find the GCC sources? I want to build this GCC as a cross-compiler.
> I tried https://github.com/loongson/gcc, but
> - with it, "gcc --version" reports "12.0.0 20210528 (experimental)",
> not "12.0.0 20211202 (experimental)",
> - my cross-compiler produces different code (worse
Hi,
Thank you for providing these machines!
Where to find the GCC sources? I want to build this GCC as a cross-compiler.
I tried https://github.com/loongson/gcc, but
- with it, "gcc --version" reports "12.0.0 20210528 (experimental)",
not "12.0.0 20211202 (experimental)",
- my cross-compi
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 07:54:33PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jan 08 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > For example, that en_US.UTF-8 (as it is on Mac OS) will not work on most
> > Linux systems, which use en_US.utf8 instead.
>
> en_US.UTF-8 works perfectly well on glibc. In fact,
On Jan 08 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> For example, that en_US.UTF-8 (as it is on Mac OS) will not work on most
> Linux systems, which use en_US.utf8 instead.
en_US.UTF-8 works perfectly well on glibc. In fact, that's the
preferred spelling.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Ke
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Andreas Schwab via cfarm-users wrote:
> On Jan 07 2022, Christian Jullien via cfarm-users wrote:
> > Also, the following variables are set
> >
> > LANG=zh_CN
> > LC_ALL=zh_CN
> > LC_CTYPE=zh_CN
> > LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN
> > LC_TYPE=zh_CN
> >
> > I set them in my
The machines should be running an NTP daemon to keep the clock
up-to-date.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
___
cfarm-users ma
On Jan 07 2022, Christian Jullien via cfarm-users wrote:
> Also, the following variables are set
>
> LANG=zh_CN
> LC_ALL=zh_CN
> LC_CTYPE=zh_CN
> LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN
> LC_TYPE=zh_CN
>
> I set them in my .bash_profile to more common en_US.UTF-8
>
> You probably want to set them globally for all users.
Bruno Haible via cfarm-users writes:
>On both machines, the clock is 8 hours behind reality.
Being in a country that's ahead of everyone else on earth's time zone, I've
become used to "clock skew detected" almost as an extra motd. A quick
workaround if you're using zipped archives is to add -D
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 12:48 AM Bruno Haible via cfarm-users
wrote:
>
> On both machines, the clock is 8 hours behind reality. When unpacking
> freshly created tarballs, this leads to warning messages such as
>
> tar: foobar-20220107: time stamp 2022-01-08 00:36:16 is 28740.13808862 s in
> the fu
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 12:57 AM Christian Jullien via cfarm-users
wrote:
>
> Also, the following variables are set
>
> LANG=zh_CN
> LC_ALL=zh_CN
> LC_CTYPE=zh_CN
> LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN
> LC_TYPE=zh_CN
>
> I set them in my .bash_profile to more common en_US.UTF-8
>
> You probably want to set them globa
On 07-01-22, Bruno Haible via cfarm-users wrote:
> On both machines, the clock is 8 hours behind reality. When unpacking
> freshly created tarballs, this leads to warning messages such as
>
> tar: foobar-20220107: time stamp 2022-01-08 00:36:16 is 28740.13808862 s in
> the future
>
> and subsequ
Message-
From: cfarm-users [mailto:cfarm-users-boun...@lists.tetaneutral.net] On
Behalf Of Bruno Haible via cfarm-users
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2022 17:47
To: cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
Cc: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] New Loongson 3A5000 machines:
gcc400
On both machines, the clock is 8 hours behind reality. When unpacking
freshly created tarballs, this leads to warning messages such as
tar: foobar-20220107: time stamp 2022-01-08 00:36:16 is 28740.13808862 s in the
future
and subsequent build failures.
Would it be possible to correct this? I th
cfarm-announces writes:
>Feel free to report any issues
First issue :-). Looks like clang is present but not set up:
> gcc test.c
> clang test.c
In file included from test.c:1:
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:394:
In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:227:
In file include
Hi Vincent,
On 07-01-22, Vincent Lefevre via cfarm-users wrote:
> On 2022-01-07 11:45:26 +0100, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote:
> > We are happy to announce the availability of two Loongson machines with a
> > recent LoongArch [1] 3A5000 processor running at 2.5 GHz: gcc400 and gcc40
On 2022-01-07 11:45:26 +0100, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote:
> We are happy to announce the availability of two Loongson machines with a
> recent LoongArch [1] 3A5000 processor running at 2.5 GHz: gcc400 and gcc401.
gcc401 was already used for a Debian-RISC-V VM running on gcc140.
R
Thanks, is it possible to install subversion please?
-Original Message-
From: cfarm-announces [mailto:cfarm-announces-boun...@lists.tetaneutral.net]
On Behalf Of CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2022 11:45
To: cfarm-announ...@lists.tetaneutral.net
Cc: CFarm
24 matches
Mail list logo
