Re: [cfarm-users] Compile Farm acceptable usage---low priority batch jobs

2025-01-03 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Am 03.01.25 um 02:40 schrieb Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users: > I have a philosophical view that idle time on servers is essentially > wasted: a sunk cost. In the age of TTL, ECL or even NMOS, that might have been true, power usage was pretty much independent of the computational load in those

[cfarm-users] gdb on gcc188

2022-12-02 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi, would it be possible to install gdb on gcc188? Regards Thomas ___ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users

[cfarm-users] Connection to gcc400 and gcc401 hangs

2022-11-15 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi, the connection to gcc400 and 401 hangs, ssh -v tells me debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.2p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.5 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_9.0 debug1: match: OpenSSH_9.0 pat OpenSSH* compat 0x0400 debug1: Authenticating to gcc400.fsf

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] New M1 machine running Linux natively: gcc103

2022-03-13 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
On 11.03.22 09:46, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote: We are very excited to announce the availability of an Apple M1 machine running Linux natively! It is accessible over SSH to all current and future compile farm users at gcc103.fsffrance.org. I cannot access the machine. When d

Re: [cfarm-users] [cfarm-announces] New Loongson 3A5000 machines: gcc400 and gcc401

2022-01-30 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi, on these machines, terminals are messed up. This is what "emacs hello.c" displays when going in via ssh from a KDE console: 5:60m#include 5:89m 5:28mint 5:21mmain() { printf (5:89m"Hello, world!\n"); } vi is similar. TERM is set to xterm-256colors (standard for KDE). Best rega

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 back online

2020-10-21 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi Baptiste, - the newer gcc lives in/usr/local/libexec/ - the binary for gdb is "egdb" to run the recent version I tried to bootstrap recent gcc trunk, but ran against a wall (again) with different error messages. Could you maybe tell me the magic incantation of the necessary configure flags

Re: [cfarm-users] Is there any machine installed with LLVM 8.0.0 above?

2020-10-20 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi Qing, I want to try LLVM, is there any farm machine that is installed LLVM 8.0.0 or above? As I have found out, gcc303 has clang 8.0.1. You have to watch out, though - the machine lacks a lot of the basic infrastructure to build the GNU tool chain. ___

[cfarm-users] Boostrapping gcc on gcc303

2020-10-17 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
[re-sending to the list, the first one was bounced] Am 17.10.20 um 14:31 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, 13:00 tkoenig--- via cfarm-users, <mailto:cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently despairing of

[cfarm-users] Boostrapping gcc on gcc303

2020-10-17 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi, I am currently despairing of being able to bootstrap gcc on gc303 (a FreeBSD machine). The installed gcc does not work because it is too old. Using clang instead, I found that that binutils is too old for gcc bootstrap. My request to cfarm-admins to install a recent binutils went unanswere

Re: [cfarm-users] Best BSD machine for a gcc test?

2020-10-05 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Am 05.10.20 um 11:00 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 19:15, tkoenig--- via cfarm-users wrote: Hi, to test a gcc development branch on a BSD machine (for now, any of the variants would do), what would be the best machine to run a full gcc bootstrap on? Define best. Such as

[cfarm-users] Best BSD machine for a gcc test?

2020-10-04 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Hi, to test a gcc development branch on a BSD machine (for now, any of the variants would do), what would be the best machine to run a full gcc bootstrap on? Or, if that is not possible, where else could I go? Best regards Thomas ___ cfarm-us

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

2019-07-03 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
You can use also "sha512 -r file" which has the same output as sha512sum. Thanks for the tip, but rather than edit a script by hand (not knowing what I exactly what I am doing) I think I will simply wait until these packages are installed. So, no gfortran bootstrap on OpenBSD tonight. Regards

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

2019-07-03 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Am 03.07.19 um 22:42 schrieb Assaf Gordon: The upgraded openbsd and compiler are on gcc302 (which I maintain), not on gcc220. Actually, I am indeed on gcc220 (it said gcc220 in the Subject line :-) So, if the maintainer of gcc220 is reading this: Would it be possible to install the uitilites n

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

2019-07-03 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Am 03.07.19 um 22:15 schrieb Assaf Gordon: Hello, On 2019-07-03 1:58 p.m., tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: contrib/download_prerequisites[238]: sha512sum: not found Could you also install that? I installed coreutils version 8.31, but the OpenBSD package includes a "g" prefix for all programs (e.g

Re: [cfarm-users] gcc220 upgrade to OpenBSD 6.5?

2019-07-03 Thread tkoenig--- via cfarm-users
Am 03.07.19 um 00:43 schrieb Assaf Gordon via cfarm-users: If it helps in any way, I've just upgraded gcc302 to OpenBSD 6.5 . Thanks! I am just trying to build gcc trunk on that machine, and I found that contrib/download_prerequisites fails with contrib/download_prerequisites[238]: sha512sum