Gregor Riepl wrote:
> OpenShift is a full-blown container
> orchestrator with many baseline services and is not comparable to a
> local Podman runtime and a handful of containers launched directly by users.
Thanks for explaining, and for blowing away my prejudice :)
__
Hi Bruno,
Use of containers generally tends to consume more memory (both RAM and disk),
compared to traditional deployment/installation methodology, right?
At least that's the impression I get from the minimum system requirements
of OpenShift [1].
That is generally true, but OpenShift is a ful
