On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 12:00 Bruno Haible, wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > May be that this is a bug of autoconf.
>
N.B. Jaroslav said that, not me :)
___
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listin
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> May be that this is a bug of autoconf.
AC_PROG_MAKE_SET, as documented [1], uses $MAKE if set or else ‘make’.
I think that's good enough, because ultimately it is the user's responsibility
to make sure that $PATH and other environment variables are set appropriately.
If
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 10:49 Jaroslav Fojtik via cfarm-users, <
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote:
> Dear cfarm users,
>
> I have attempted to compile my code on gcc211.
>
> ./configure
> runs well.
>
> But there is some problem, that autoconf macro:
>
> @SET_MAKE@
>
> Does not work properly.
Jaroslav Fojtik wrote:
> make is not installed on system.
> There is "gmake".
Indeed:
* On gcc210, there is /usr/xpg4/bin/make = /usr/ccs/bin/make and
/opt/csw/bin/gmake.
* On gcc211, there is only /opt/csw/bin/gmake.
$ pkg search /usr/bin/make
and
$ pkg search /usr/ccs/bin/m
Dear cfarm users,
I have attempted to compile my code on gcc211.
./configure
runs well.
But there is some problem, that autoconf macro:
@SET_MAKE@
Does not work properly. It expands to "make", but make is not installed on
system.
There is "gmake". May be that this is a wrong configuration of
