On 2021-03-24 13:45, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Kaz,
On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
sizes
in the protocol stack.
...
I have a test case involving UDP that works on numerous platforms, the
oddball being MacOS
So, the test machine was useful to you: it has tol
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:39:10AM -0700, Kaz Kylheku via cfarm-users wrote:
> On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
> sizes
> in the protocol stack.
>
> Would it be possible to put this configuration into effect:
>
>sysctl -w net.inet.udp.maxdgram=65535
The
Hi Kaz,
> On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
> sizes
> in the protocol stack.
> ...
> I have a test case involving UDP that works on numerous platforms, the
> oddball being MacOS
So, the test machine was useful to you: it has told you that a test case
(and pres
On 2021-03-20 14:51, CFarm Annoucements via cfarm-announces wrote:
We are happy to announce the availability of a new MiniMac M1 (with
Apple-Silicon arm64 cpu architecture).
Hi!
Thanks for making this machine available.
On Mac OS, there are, by default, bizarre restrictions on IP datagram
si
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:50 AM Jonas Maebe via cfarm-users
wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2021 01:31, Assaf Gordon via cfarm-users wrote:
> > - will it compromise SIP (
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Integrity_Protection ) ?
>
> Note that keeping SIP enabled completely decimates compiler regressi
On 23/03/2021 01:31, Assaf Gordon via cfarm-users wrote:
> - will it compromise SIP (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Integrity_Protection ) ?
Note that keeping SIP enabled completely decimates compiler regression
testing performance, because it means that every time you execute a
compiled
