[Cerowrt-devel] secure by design and default?

2023-04-13 Thread Dave Taht via Cerowrt-devel
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/13/us-launches-secure-software-push-with-new-guidelines/ -- AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC ___ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-dev

[Cerowrt-devel] can bus attack

2023-04-13 Thread Dave Taht via Cerowrt-devel
The biggest bug with the early fq_codel deployment was that it dropped from head and fq'd which led to the prospect of messages sent out of order on the can protocol, which was not designed for that.. After much thought, we ended up overriding the default fq_codel qdisc, for a fifo, for the can bus

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] can bus attack

2023-04-13 Thread Sebastian Moeller via Cerowrt-devel
Hi Dave, > On Apr 14, 2023, at 06:04, Dave Taht via Cerowrt-devel > wrote: > > The biggest bug with the early fq_codel deployment was that it dropped > from head and fq'd which led to the prospect of messages sent out of > order on the can protocol, which was not designed for that.. [

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] can bus attack

2023-04-13 Thread Bill Woodcock via Cerowrt-devel
> On Apr 14, 2023, at 8:08 AM, Sebastian Moeller via Cerowrt-devel > wrote: >> there were a few years there where >> fq_codel was the default for can, in openwrt, which sometimes keeps me >> awake at night. > > [SM] How many critical CAN bus implementations actually use OpenWrt? I > thought CAN