Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ntia broadband RFC

2022-02-01 Thread Dave Taht
I still have not got on this, and the filing deadline is feb 4th. If anyone wants to weigh in... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FjRo9MNnVOLh733SNPNyqaR1IFee7Q5qbMrmW1PlPr8/edit?usp=sharing possibly leveraging some of this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T21on7g1MqQZoK91epUdxLYFGdtyLRgB

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ntia broadband RFC

2022-01-20 Thread Dave Taht
I intend to use the illustrative cartoon here at some point, if I get on this. https://blog.discourse.org/2022/01/discourse-gives-back-2021 On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:11 AM Livingood, Jason wrote: > > In my personal opinion, these agencies are usually quite happy to have > comments from technica

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ntia broadband RFC

2022-01-20 Thread Livingood, Jason via Cerowrt-devel
--- Begin Message --- In my personal opinion, these agencies are usually quite happy to have comments from technical experts. If any of you do make comments, making them concise and not too complex will tend to ensure they are widely read and internalized. ;-) In the details, I could certainly s