On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Aaron Wood wrote:
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) We need a new box that can do inbou
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit.
So far
that box has not appeared. We have not explor
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far
that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an
alternative.
If you ar
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far
that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative.
If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take?
David Lang
2) We need a new box that any
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far
>> that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an
>> alternative.
>>
>
> If you are using a x86 processor, how
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far
that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative.
2) We need a new box that anyone can use that should be available for 2-3
years to come.
3) I'd like to be focused mostly on wifi, personally.
Do