Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-19 Thread David Lang
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Aaron Wood wrote: Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-19 Thread Aaron Wood
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: 1) We need a new box that can do inbou

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-19 Thread Richard Smith
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far that box has not appeared. We have not explor

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-16 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative. If you ar

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-16 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative. If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take? David Lang 2) We need a new box that any

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-16 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > > 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far >> that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an >> alternative. >> > > If you are using a x86 processor, how

[Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have

2015-03-16 Thread Dave Taht
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative. 2) We need a new box that anyone can use that should be available for 2-3 years to come. 3) I'd like to be focused mostly on wifi, personally. Do