On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 05:45 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Török Edwin writes:
>>
>>> I hacked the script to set the interface name for iptables to pppoe-ge00
>>> (not for uci, cause uci
>>> doesn't have an enabled=1 for pppoe):
>>>
Török Edwin writes:
> Thanks, that worked (both for /etc/config/bcp38 and /etc/config/sqm).
> The netperf streams seem to be better separated with pppoe-ge00.png
Great!
> It shows only @ge00, ge00, and se00, and selecting the @ge00 doesn't
> help.
Hmm, probably need to find another way to extr
Török Edwin writes:
> I hacked the script to set the interface name for iptables to pppoe-ge00 (not
> for uci, cause uci
> doesn't have an enabled=1 for pppoe):
> setup_ipset
> + interface=pppoe-ge00
> setup_iptables "$interface"
>
> Any idea how to
On 06/04/2014 01:15, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> It would have helped to have a backup.
> Yup, hindsight is 50/50 [sic]
>
>> As best I recall we'd had to add 3 lines to the smb.conf.template file,
>> notably
>>
>> wins support = yes
> Yup, did t
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> It would have helped to have a backup.
Yup, hindsight is 50/50 [sic]
> As best I recall we'd had to add 3 lines to the smb.conf.template file,
> notably
>
> wins support = yes
Yup, did that. Not working this time around.
Maybe I'll play aro
On 04/05/2014 06:53 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Török Edwin
> wrote:
>> I hacked the script to set the interface name for iptables to pppoe-ge00
>> (not for uci, cause uci
>> doesn't have an enabled=1 for pppoe):
>> setup_ipset
>> + interf
It would have helped to have a backup. As best I recall we'd had to
add 3 lines to the smb.conf.template file, notably
wins support = yes
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C
wrote:
> Not the cleanest upgrade, for me at least. It went something like this:
>
> After doing a sysupgr
Not the cleanest upgrade, for me at least. It went something like this:
After doing a sysupgrade from 3.10.32-12, Windows file sharing across
the subnets was no longer working. Referring to:
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Sharing_Windows_Files_from_wired_to_wireless
I noticed
In_trying_to_sort_out_the_differences_between_the_people
working_wifi_for_long_periods,vs_those_without...
I_am_curious_if_your_country
code_is_set,and_what_it_is_set_to,and_your_wifi_channel_set
It_is_long_past_time_we_start_up_a_formal_bug_for_this,
but_I'll_wait_for_my_spacebar.
In_a_known_pr
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Neil Shepperd wrote:
>> Sounds like you are going to stick with -4 for a bit?
>
> Actually, this is the first time I've tried cerowrt on a router. But
> yeah, I'll stick with the current version unless you come out with a new
> patch to try.
Thx. I am hoping this i
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/03/2014 04:17 AM, Dave Taht wrote:> + resync with openwrt
>>they seem to be settling down...
>> + Toke's ntp + dnssec stuff
>> + Yet Another Patch to try and isolate the wireless hang problem
>> that happens to jg every day
> Sounds like you are going to stick with -4 for a bit?
Actually, this is the first time I've tried cerowrt on a router. But
yeah, I'll stick with the current version unless you come out with a new
patch to try.
> what I've been doing is mounting a usb stick, and just running continuously
> on th
Hi,
On 04/03/2014 04:17 AM, Dave Taht wrote:> + resync with openwrt
>they seem to be settling down...
> + Toke's ntp + dnssec stuff
> + Yet Another Patch to try and isolate the wireless hang problem
> that happens to jg every day or so and nearly no-one else.
> + Fix to babel's meshing int
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> >>
> >> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that run
> >> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in
Dave Taht writes:
> Is there a recent version that people had that was seemingly stable for
> wifi that we could step back to and bisect from? Something where
> you had heavy wifu use for week(s) without a problem?
FWIW I haven't seen the issue I had again. Am currently at just under 6
days of u
I have an OSX laptop on 5ghz, a Linux desktop and server via ethernet,
Linux Laptop via 5gz, Roku via 5gz, Nexus 7 via 5gz, and misc other
devices... I didn't get my total bandwidth on 3.10.32-12, 3.10.34-1, but
I've done 3.3GB down 0.9GB up since flashing 3.10.34-4. I've had no
problems on any of
Clients: two android devices (Google Nexus 5 and SGS3), one Arch Linux
laptop, iPad, MacBook Pro (from time to time).
Regards,
Max
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
>>
>> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that run
>> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time... The 5GHz
>> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that run
> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time... The 5GHz
> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. No problems at all.
>
And I also have
Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that run
2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time... The 5GHz
radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. No problems at all.
-Aaron
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Maxim Kharlamov wrote:
> The las
For starters, let me suggest commenting out the multicast_rate parameter
from /etc/config/wireless and rebooting. Given an issue with dhcp
reported earlier today, that an issue with multicast.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Maxim Kharlamov wrote:
> The last release without wifi issues was 3.8.s
The last release without wifi issues was 3.8.something (I think it was
called Berlin). The whole 3.10.x branch seems to have broken wifi (will see
how 3.10.24-4 goes, it seems OK, but it's been working less than 24hours
yet).
I'm using only 2.4Ghz (5Ghz dead in the water - devices couldn't connect
Is there a recent version that people had that was seemingly stable for
wifi that we could step back to and bisect from? Something where
you had heavy wifu use for week(s) without a problem?
(I know that until we got focused on this, and people focused on
reporting it, that maybe it was happening
I just flashed 3.10.34-4 to my new WNDR3800 and experienced the exact
wifi hang described by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen. But I'm on the 2.4GHz
network (with guest and babel disabled). Unfortunately I didn't think to
try tracing anything from the router side before resetting the wireless.
Syslog was fi
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Stephen Hemminger <
step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> I am seeing wireless hang as well.
> Mostly when multiple macbooks are active on 2.4g
>
>
Also true in my house: both kids are on Macbooks.
But I've seen the problem with no-one but me (on Linux) around, so a
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/04/how-new-malware-is-making-the-internet-of-things-the-windows-xp-of-2014/
It's reaching tech journalism now. Could it be an attempted exploit taking
out jg's router? IE, another hacked router on his cable modem segment
scanning for other hosts to exploit.
--
I am actually far from convinced it is actually a wifi bug. It could
be something going wrong with routing, firewalling, nat, or something
else entirely. I have several captures of sw00 and ge00 taken after
the event occurs, and local udp, arp, and icmp and icmpv6 traffic is
working correctly. As i
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> I am seeing wireless hang as well.
> Mostly when multiple macbooks are active on 2.4g
Grump. This patch is what is in 3.10.34-4. It is essentially the same as the
patch that I've been carrying in cerowrt for ages, but I dropped it
circa 3
I am seeing wireless hang as well.
Mostly when multiple macbooks are active on 2.4g
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
+ resync with openwrt
they seem to be settling down...
+ Toke's ntp + dnssec stuff
+ Yet Another Patch to try and isolate the wireless hang problem
that happens to jg every day or so and nearly no-one else.
+ Fix to babel's meshing interfaces
+ dnsmasq updated to head (seems to be stabilizin
30 matches
Mail list logo
