Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ath10k test of openwrt head

2020-03-31 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cerowrt-devel
--- Begin Message --- Dave Taht writes: > I just wanted to say I just tested that last openwrt patch... and it > was *beautiful*. I went from where > a load test could crack 3 seconds on the uap mesh router... and > disable the babel protocol, to 20ms Yay! :) -Toke --- End Message --- _

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ath10k test of openwrt head

2020-03-30 Thread Dave Taht
I just wanted to say I just tested that last openwrt patch... and it was *beautiful*. I went from where a load test could crack 3 seconds on the uap mesh router... and disable the babel protocol, to 20ms /me wipes away tear of joy On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:33 AM Dave Taht wrote: > > On Mon,

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ath10k test of openwrt head

2020-03-30 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:35 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Dave Taht writes: > > > well, aqm is engaging, but waaay too late - 2-3 sec latencies on a > > given 10mbit wifi test. > > So this would be without AQL, right? Well I thought the code was in that build which is what triggered me t

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ath10k test of openwrt head

2020-03-30 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dave Taht writes: > well, aqm is engaging, but waaay too late - 2-3 sec latencies on a > given 10mbit wifi test. So this would be without AQL, right? -Toke ___ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.ne

[Cerowrt-devel] ath10k test of openwrt head

2020-03-29 Thread Dave Taht
well, aqm is engaging, but waaay too late - 2-3 sec latencies on a given 10mbit wifi test. perhaps the ath10k-smallbuffers-ct firmware is more of the right thing. and osx catalina doesn't negotiate ecn. root@test:/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/netdev:wlan0/stations/80:2a:a8:55:8e:15# cat aqm ta