Hi Dave,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 16:54 , Dave Taht wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Rich,
>>
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2014, at 14:09 , Rich Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize my responses to
>>> all your notes now, then
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 14:09 , Rich Brown wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize my responses to
>> all your notes now, then I'll go away and run more tests.
>>
>> - Yes, I am using netperf 2.6
Hi Rich,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 14:09 , Rich Brown wrote:
> Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize my responses to all
> your notes now, then I'll go away and run more tests.
>
> - Yes, I am using netperf 2.6.0 and netperf-wrapper from Toke's github repo.
>
> - The "sync rate
Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize my responses to all
your notes now, then I'll go away and run more tests.
- Yes, I am using netperf 2.6.0 and netperf-wrapper from Toke's github repo.
- The "sync rate" is the speed with which the DSL modem sends bits to/from my
house. I
Hi Rich,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 22:54 , Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 15:36 , Rich Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
>> two other effects:
>>
>> - I don't get the full "7 mbps down, 768 kbps up" a
Hi Fred,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 16:24 , Fred Stratton wrote:
> How are you measuring the link speed?
>
> With SQM enabled, I have speedtest.net results far below the values at which
> the gateway syncs.
>
> IF the gateway syncs at 12000/1000, the speedtest figures are 9500/850
>
> The performanc
Hi Rich,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 15:36 , Rich Brown wrote:
>
> CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
> two other effects:
>
> - I don't get the full "7 mbps down, 768 kbps up" as touted by my DSL
> provider (Fairpoint). In fact, CeroWrt struggles to get ab
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> Rich,
>
> One thing that helped considerably on my my DSL link (21000/1200), was
> turning on the Link Layer Adaptation. With that, and efq_codel, I've been
> very happy with the (nearly non-existent) latency. Yeah, I lost a couple
> percent
Rich,
One thing that helped considerably on my my DSL link (21000/1200), was
turning on the Link Layer Adaptation. With that, and efq_codel, I've been
very happy with the (nearly non-existent) latency. Yeah, I lost a couple
percent off the top, but the behavior is better. Although I was startin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Rich Brown wrote:
>>
>> CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
>> two other effects:
>>
>> - I don't get the full "7 mbps down, 768 kbps up" as touted by my DSL
>> provide
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Rich Brown wrote:
>
> CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
> two other effects:
>
> - I don't get the full "7 mbps down, 768 kbps up" as touted by my DSL
> provider (Fairpoint). In fact, CeroWrt struggles to get above 6.0/0
How are you measuring the link speed?
With SQM enabled, I have speedtest.net results far below the values at
which the gateway syncs.
IF the gateway syncs at 12000/1000, the speedtest figures are 9500/850
The performance I obtain with streaming video is very good, tweaking the
extra settings
Do you have the latest (head) version of netperf and netperf-wrapper? some
changes were made to both that give better UDP results.
-Aaron
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
>
> CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it
> has two other effects:
>
CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
two other effects:
- I don't get the full "7 mbps down, 768 kbps up" as touted by my DSL provider
(Fairpoint). In fact, CeroWrt struggles to get above 6.0/0.6 mbps.
- When I adjust the SQM parameters to get close to t
14 matches
Mail list logo
