On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:00pm, "Mikael Abrahamsson"
said:
> Yes, I guess people who have been staring at traffic graphs and Netflow
> collector system output for 10-15 years have no insight into what and how
> much traffic is going where.
That's exactly what I am saying.
__
Don't want to dwell on this, but Sandvine is not an unbiased source. And it is
apparently the *only* source - and 50% is a LOT. Even Trump and Clinton don't
have 50% of the electorate each. :-)
Does Sandvine have the resources to examine a true sample of all Internet
traffic?
Maybe the NSA d
On 20/09/2016, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
> I constantly see the claim that >50% of transmitted data on the Internet are
> streaming TV. However, the source seems to be as hard to nail down as the
> original claim that >50% of Internet traffic was pirated music being sent
> over bittorrent.
uh, ibid.
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
Of course, the best propaganda is the stuff that you can get engineers
in the field to promulgate based on their "gut feel".
Yes, I guess people who have been staring at traffic graphs and Netflow
collector system output for 10-15 years have no insi
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 3:32am, "Alan Jenkins"
said:
> On 20/09/16 21:27, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
> I don't think the source is hard to identify. It's Sandvine press
> releases. That's what the periodic stories on Ars Technica are always
> derived from.
>
> https://www.sandvine.com/pr
bittorrent is a kind of "FTP" rather than semi-isochornous (i.e. rate-bounded)
"TV" in my personal classification. As I'm sure you know, the two are quite
different in their effects on congestion and their handling of congestion.
The idea that bittorrent dominated the Internet traffic volume at
et traffic has
become netflix-like. *anything* e2e that can reduce the negative
impact of the big fat flows on everything else is a win.
-Original Message-
From: "Jonathan Morton"
Sent: Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:11 pm
To: "Maciej Soltysiak"
Cc: "Maciej Soltysiak&
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
I constantly see the claim that >50% of transmitted data on the Internet
are streaming TV. However, the source seems to be as hard to nail down
as the original claim that >50% of Internet traffic was pirated music
being sent over bittorrent.
It's m
gt;>
>> While I agree *strongly* that lots of short flows is how the internet
>> mostly operates, (I used to cite a paper on this a lot)
>>
>> a huge number of bulk flows exist that has been messing up the short
>> flows. I think the number was something 70% of int
hing* e2e that can reduce the negative
> impact of the big fat flows on everything else is a win.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: "Jonathan Morton"
>> Sent: Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:11 pm
>> To: "Maciej Soltysiak"
ssage-
> From: "Jonathan Morton"
> Sent: Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:11 pm
> To: "Maciej Soltysiak"
> Cc: "Maciej Soltysiak" ,
> "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] BBR congestion control algorithm for TCP
j Soltysiak" ,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] BBR congestion control algorithm for TCP innet-next
> On 17 Sep, 2016, at 21:34, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
>
> Cake and fq_codel work on all packets and aim to signal packet loss early to
> network stacks
12 matches
Mail list logo
