--- Begin Message ---
Sad news day.
Learned so much from Dave about the network about the importance of sharing
ideas, and not to take one self too seriously.
Will miss you my friend...
Sebastian Moeller
> On 1. Apr 2025, at 19:57, Stuart Cheshire via Starlink
> wrote:
>
&g
Hi Mark,
> On Oct 11, 2023, at 21:05, Mark Thurston wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote ---
>> Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router?
>> Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular
>>
>
> Sorry if this is a silly comment
Hi Dave,
> On Apr 14, 2023, at 06:04, Dave Taht via Cerowrt-devel
> wrote:
>
> The biggest bug with the early fq_codel deployment was that it dropped
> from head and fq'd which led to the prospect of messages sent out of
> order on the can protocol, which was not designed for that..
[
Hi Aaron,
> On Mar 9, 2023, at 16:43, Aaron Wood via Cerowrt-devel
> wrote:
>
> At least for the sub-1GHz 802.15.4, that’s for range that wifi can’t get, due
> to its lower signal loss over distance.
>
> But 10Mbut Ethernet’s weird (to me)
They also have a Gpbs ethernet port:
Ether
Hi Matt.
Over on the OpenWrt forum there are a lot of reports of tp-link's ue300 using
an RTL8153 chip working robustly and reliably with speeds up to the expected
limit for gigabit ethernet. Reports for Asix model(s) indicate some driver
inefficiencies that make it impossible ot reach the exp
Dear Dave, dear all
please, let me introduce Andrew to this list, who is the driving force behind
CAKE-autorate's design and implementation (which started from a more
theoretical discussion in the OpenWrt forum before turning into something
tangible). There are other alternative approaches for
N plant every user of that PON will owe the
incumbent some money
c) control II: no competitor will be able to offer more advanced technology
over a PON than its owner.
>
> /Jonas
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 2:23 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>
>
> > On
om/speedtest/70320015
> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/70346586
> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/70346578
Thanks!
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> /Jonas
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:55 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>
> > On Jan 14, 2
; matter, having a SFP that could go right into a SFP enabled home router
> > rather than a separate unit seems like a good idea, also
>
> Yes, but ideally I guess you would also need some control of the OLT side.
> You may want to look into the VOLTHA project run by ONF:
>
&
Hi Dave,
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 16:59, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 7:57 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>> this thread
>> https://www.computerbase.de/forum/threads/eigenes-modem-an-ftth-anschluss-via-sfp
seems somehow based on an ancient OpenWrt)
Regards
Sebastian
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 15:38, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> And a gpon onu
>
> https://www.fs.com/products/133619.html
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:23 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> That is similar
ht not for a few years (oh, the irony, as I am
living literally next door to a central office of the incumbent telco, spanning
a fiber cable over less then 20 m should get me FTTH, but I digress)
Regards
Sebastian
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:51 AM Sebastian Moeller wr
ave Taht wrote:
>
> And a gpon onu
>
> https://www.fs.com/products/133619.html
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:23 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> That is similar to what happens in some GPON-ONT SFPs, some run a full small
>> Linux distribution like OpenWrt
That is similar to what happens in some GPON-ONT SFPs, some run a full small
Linux distribution like OpenWrt inside though for ethernet that is
unexpected.
This is also similar to SFP VDSL "modems" which likely run their own embedded
OS as well inside the SFP package (at a time there was eve
No idea, sqm-scripts long had supported htb's linklayer accounting but
defaulted to using tc stab instead, and mainly for htb+fq_codel, for cake it
defaulted to cake's internal accounting.
I have no recollection when I last tested that, probably when I was still on an
ADSL link without a releva
new ONT and lack of in home 10G kit on
> the market. But the access network is there.
>
> Similar stories in other regions I know of that offer XGPon - lack of
> consumer demand, lack of ONTs in the market that are suitable for residential
> use.
>
>
>
>
>
&
100/40 plan, so a far cry from GPON's local max of 1000/200 let
alone XGSPONs yet unkown rate-plans, but I rarely think "if I only had faster
internet access" (I will still switch to FTTH ASAP, since I would like not
having to bother/monitor the DSL link parameters to check for er
To add to Joel's point,
I can do my own catX cable runs and connect sockets/plugs to the cables, but I
lack the tools for fiber-splicing... as cool as that would be it is going to be
hard to justify multi-100s EUR for a splicer.. That still leaves short distance
in the main computing area of an
Hi Luca,
> On Dec 9, 2021, at 18:38, Luca Muscariello wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 17:09 Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Luca
>
> > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:58, Luca Muscariello wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 20
Hi Luca
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:58, Luca Muscariello wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:35 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:18, Dave Taht wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello
Hi Dave,
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:18, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello wrote:
>>
>> Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245
>>
>> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bbcc5ef5-e677-4f27-aa04-1849db81d0f5
>
> Nice.
>
> A kvetch is that I really wish
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 11:10, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> --On Thursday, December 02, 2021 10:48 AM -0800 Dave Taht
> wrote:
>
>> tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT
>> shipping a SQM system. Perhaps this could be modded up with someones
>> with accounts?
>>
>>
Hi David,
you probably had noticed that the cited paper was about LTE/(5G) where the base
station operates the scheduler that arbitrates both up- and downstream
transmissions. And according to the paper that ends up in bursting on the
upstream (I wonder how L4S with its increases burst sensiti
Hi Bob,
OWD != RTT/2 seems generically to be the rule on the internet not the
exception, even with perfectly symmetric access links. Routing between AS
often is asymmetric in it self (hot potato routing, where each AS hands over
packets destined to others as early as possible, means that forwa
Hi Dave,
Well, less asymmetric down/up ratios are certainly worth fighting for (for one
NTP should work better). And, as I might add, something that is orthogonal to
better router software ;) a fast symmetric link with a craptastic router is
still roughly as much fun as a dial-up connection wit
There is also an io board for the compute module that offers a PCIe slot which
might could be used for a real NIC...
On 17 March 2021 03:57:24 CET, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 17 Mar, 2021, at 3:01 am, David Lang wrote:
>>
>> This is using the compute module, that does not have any on-board
Could you try to run top or htop and look at the CPU load? I could imagine that
the fixes dnsmasq might have some CPU spikes that simply leave not enough
cycles for the traffic shaper?
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 22:25, Jonathan Foulkes wrote:
>
> I figure there shoul
But is it Turing complete?
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 20:04, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> who knew?
>
> https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> d...@taht.net CTO, TekLi
air" power-boosting
are naturally in the same few dozends of seconds range as typical speedtests
take, nothing nefarious here.
>
> Mat
>
>> On 1 May 2020, at 20:48, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> well, it was a free service and i
get an early
exit from contracts if the ISPs can not deliver the contracted rates (with a
bit of slack)))
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> SERGEY FEDOROV
> Director of Engineering
> sfedo...@netflix.com
> 121 Albright Way | Los Gatos, CA 95032
>
>
>
> On
Hi Dave,
well, it was a free service and it lasted a long time. I want to raise a toast
to Justin and convey my sincere thanks for years of investing into the "good"
of the internet.
Now, the question is which test is going to be the rightful successor?
Short of running netperf/irtt/iper2/ip
Hi Rich,
since it seems to be IPv6 related, why not use firefox for netflix and disable
IPv6 in firefox (see
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-cant-load-websites-other-browsers-can#w_ipv6)
maybe that works well enough?
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Mar 21, 2020, at 21:20,
Hi Maciej
> On Jan 9, 2020, at 22:58, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In case you haven't seen that happen as it's quite fresh...
> OpenWrt 19.07 [1] is out, with ar71xx transitioning to ath79, with WPA3
> support.
>
> Anybody upgraded their WNDR3800 to ath79-based 19.07 yet?
I s
Hi Pete,
If the PayPal ad of an irtt packet would contain the requested DSCP as ascci
string (maybe starting with a string like "DSCP: 46: 101110 (EF)" in the first
few bytes of the payload would make confirming bleaching/remapping from
packetdumps relatively convenient, say just by looking at
Hi Toke,
> On Sep 7, 2019, at 00:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>
>> Hi Toke,
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2019, at 19:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>>>
Hi Toke,
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 19:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>
>> Hi Toke,
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2019, at 10:27, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>> Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
>>>
>>>&g
Hi Toke,
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 10:27, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
>
>> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, Matt Taggart wrote:
>>
>>> So an interesting idea but they have some things they could improve.
>>
>> I've been considering what one should run in parallel with the spee
Not sure this is on-topic, but:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/root-cause-analysis-and-incident-report-on-the-august-ddos-attack-300905405.html
https://lists.gt.net/nanog/users/206044
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 16:21, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:23 AM Mikael Abrahamsson
ing forward at higher speeds.
>>> I do wish the document had pointed out more clearly that router based
>>> measurements have problems also, with weaker cpus unable to source
>>> enough traffic for an accurate measurement, but I do hope this
>>> document has impact
ance bound on
devices to be useful for David's idea, the CPU(s) need to be beefy enough to
both shape at Gbps speeds as well as actually generate enough traffic to
saturate the link
Again thanks a lot for sharing!
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> Best regards,
>
>
source OS running on a docsis modem, same seems true for GPON).
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:32 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I believe the following to be relevant to this discussion:
>>
Hi All,
I believe the following to be relevant to this discussion:
https://apenwarr.ca/log/20180808
Where he discusses a similar idea including implementation albeit aimed at
lower bandwidth and sans the automatic bandwidth tracking.
> On May 15, 2019, at 01:34, David P. Reed wrote:
>
>
>
Hi Dave,
On April 9, 2019 5:42:46 PM GMT+02:00, Dave Taht wrote:
>these chips are apparentlt common these days... anyone have one?
Not yet, there is a grx350 modem-router available heret personally I would
prefer the 550, which comes with >= 2 x86 (atom, are they still called that?)
Cores. But
> On Feb 2, 2019, at 11:36, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> David Lang writes:
>
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, David Lang wrote:
>>>
I had high hopes for these, but the driver development is not working
well,
it's one guy at M
Hi Mikael,
> On Nov 27, 2018, at 14:34, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>> Really, which ones? I would like to know so I can avoid them ;) Just
>> joking, but I have never heard of secure booting in the context of MI
Hi Mikael,
> On Nov 27, 2018, at 12:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>> I guess that most cheap routers do not actually do "secure boot" but rather
>> make it hard to flash not-approved firmware binaries fro
Hi Dave,
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 19:40, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:24 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>> neither the openwrt folks (see https://openwrt.org) nor the chaos computer
>> club of germany (see G
Hi Mikael,
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 19:35, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>> And 2) basically is a complaint that there is a weak MAY clause for
>> guaranteeing that 3rd party firmware like openwrt is installable. I think
Hi Dave,
neither the openwrt folks (see https://openwrt.org) nor the chaos computer club
of germany (see German: https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2018/risikorouter,
machinenglish:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccc.de%2Fen%2Fupda
Desar All,
> On Oct 10, 2018, at 00:22, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
>> On 10 Oct, 2018, at 1:06 am, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>
>> Wonder what happens if/when the neighbor notices...
>
> I don't think any neighbour is involved here. He's using his own xfinitywifi
> hotspot in parallel wit
Hi Mikael,
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 14:47, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I/we really should have beat the bql drum harder over the last 6 years. It's
>> the basic start to all the debloating.
>
> It only helps with kernel based forwarding. A lot of dev
I believe that cable modems all default to 192.168.100.1, this seems to be
backed by "Cable Modem Operations Support System Interface Specification",
CM-SP-CM-OSSIv3.1-I04-150611:
" • The CM MUST support 192.168.100.1, as the well-known diagnostic IP
address accessible only from the CMCI
Hi Kevin,
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 11:15, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20 Jun 2018, at 09:07, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2018, at 09:12, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
>>> wrote
Hi Kevin,
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 09:12, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20 Jun 2018, at 00:41, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Jun, 2018, at 11:34 pm, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we have a good cookbook on how to determine the set-rate?
>>
>> On DSL, the syn
Hi all,
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 01:32, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> Well,
>
> On June 19, 2018 10:34:07 PM GMT+02:00, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:46:18 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>>
>>> One of cake's "minor" features
On June 20, 2018 1:41:19 AM GMT+02:00, Jonathan Morton
wrote:
>> On 19 Jun, 2018, at 11:34 pm, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>
>> Do we have a good cookbook on how to determine the set-rate?
>
>On DSL, the sync rates in each direction should usually be readable
>from the modem; they are typi
Well,
On June 19, 2018 10:34:07 PM GMT+02:00, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:46:18 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>
>> One of cake's "minor" features is the *perfect* defeat of the htb
>> based shaper in cable modems. If you know the set-rate on the modem,
>> you just set it to the
Question: does anybody know what hides behind eero's sqm name?
Best Regards
Sebastian
On June 15, 2018 8:03:33 PM GMT+02:00, Dave Taht wrote:
>I didn't know streamboost was still a thing.
>
>https://www.snbforums.com/threads/list-of-smart-queue-management-sqm-routers.47183/
>
>And I lik
There also is the Mitsubishi pajero competing for the crown of unfortunate
names (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Pajero for alternative
meanings of pajero besides giving a nod to Leopardus pajeros the pampas cat). I
guess the Toyota and the Mitsubishe comnpete in different discupli
:36, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> this a to-the-router test, not a through the router test.
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>>> On Nov 20, 2016, at 20:30, Da
Hi Dave,
when I use tcp_12down instead of tcp_ndown I end up with something looking sane
(see attached image?)
Also:
Summary of tcp_12down test run at 2016-11-20 20:16:54.350770:
avg / median # data pts
Ping (ms) ICMP :54.08 /53.75
Hi Dave,
> On Nov 20, 2016, at 20:30, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Has the omnia got this problem?
Not sure, following your recipe from the LEDE bug, I attempted:
bash-3.2$ ./run-flent -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net
–test-parameter=download_streams=12 tcp_ndown
Fatal error: Hostname lookup failed for h
Hi James, hi David,
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 06:29, James Cloos wrote:
>
>> "DL" == David Lang writes:
>
> DL> I wonder if you are running into the problem with encryption and
> DL> packet re-ordering that was solved a couple months ago, try disabling
> DL> fq_codel or test without encryption
Dear all,
It looks like I forgot the link to the ms announcement:
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/networking/2016/07/18/announcing-new-transport-advancements-in-the-anniversary-update-for-windows-10-and-windows-server-2016/
On August 13, 2016 12:27:14 AM GMT+02:00, "Dave Täht" wrote:
>
>
Hi Dave,
On June 27, 2016 2:00:55 AM GMT+02:00, David Lang wrote:
>I don't think anyone is trying to do simultanious receive of different
>stations.
>That is an incredibly difficult thing to do right.
>
>MU-MIMO is aimed at haivng the AP transmit to multiple stations at the
>same
>time. For th
Hi,
Maybe https://github.com/jwbensley/Etherate/blob/master/README.md could be of
use here? Have not used it myself but it seems to at least partly match your
requirements based on reading the readme...
Best Regards
Sebastian
On June 10, 2016 11:45:30 PM GMT+02:00, dpr...@reed.com wrote
Hi John,
On April 8, 2016 3:55:21 PM GMT+02:00, John Yates wrote:
>Sebastian,
>
>Recently you wrote:
>
>In your case select Ethernet with overhead, and manually put 24 into
>these
>> packet overhead field, as the kernel already accounted for 14 of the
>total
>> of 38.
>>
>
>and further down: mi
>
Hi Richard,
On April 8, 2016 1:51:11 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Smith
wrote:
>On 04/07/2016 12:16 PM, moeller0 wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>>> For these tests I had the inbound and outbound limits set to 975000
>>> kbps. 975000 was somewhat arbitrary. I wanted it below 1Gbps
>>> enough that I could
Hi Dave,
On Dec 2, 2015, at 17:12 , Dave Taht wrote:
> thx, all, for:
>
> https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts/issues/19
Glad you like it ;) It seems we went a bit too far and will need to
introduce a few more lines per invocation (currently we sort of declare success
before all we
On Nov 11, 2015, at 10:01 , Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> http://solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/clearfog/clearfog-specifications/
>
> Armada 385 is still my favorite.
>
> Turris Omnia looks promising:
>
> http://www.netnod.se/sites/default/files/
Hi David,
On Oct 26, 2015, at 19:15 , David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> in terms of testing wifi, the most useful series of tests to conduct
>> at the moment - since we plan to fix per station queuing soon
>
> how soon is 'soon'? I'm going to be building my image f
Hi Toke,
On Oct 26, 2015, at 14:50 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>
>> So, I have no recipe for home-brew, but I use the attached as
>> local ports collection under macports to get flent to run:
>
> You mind if I put this tuto
Hi Richard,
On Oct 25, 2015, at 21:02 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 01:36 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
>
>> We really do believe in this stuff. We've seen it work. But each of
>> us is enough of a scientist to believe that *we could be wrong*. (I
>> suspect that's why you really got everyone'
Hi Richard,
On Oct 25, 2015, at 17:07 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 11:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
>
>> So I started to try and re-create my steps for failure.. I _am_ able to
>> duplicate the problem but I'm not able to figure out how. It seems to
>> just come and go irrespective o
nsmission delay so he might know already whether sqm has issues
with 1GE lans.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> On Oct 24, 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Oct 24, 2015, at 00:53 , David P. Reed wrote:
>
> In particular, the DUT should probably
Hi Dave,
On Oct 24, 2015, at 12:20 , Dave Taht wrote:
> Another thought is that this hardware agressively does GRO - 64k
> "packets"really messes up htb. We already showed that problem in the
> previous generation.
Good point. To disable the offloads one needs to disable offloads for
a
Hi David,
On Oct 24, 2015, at 00:53 , David P. Reed wrote:
> In particular, the DUT should probably have no more than 2 packets of
> outbound queueing given the very small RTT. 2xRTT is the most buffering you
> want in the loop.
Let’s not haggle about the precise amount of queueing w
Hi David,
On Oct 24, 2015, at 00:48 , David P. Reed wrote:
> Sqm is a way to deal with the dsl or cable modem having bufferbloat. In the
> configuration described neither end is the problem ... the DUT itself may
> have bufferbloat.
But our claim is that we “solved” (at least wired) b
Hi David,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 19:57 , David Lang wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Aaron Wood wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
>>
>>> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test.
>>>
>>> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory
>>> f
Hi Richard,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 19:30 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 01:02 PM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>>> Go the sqm tab in the GUI and set egress and ingress to 1, set the
>>> interface to the upstream interface, click enable, click save and
>>> apply. Everything else is left at de
Hi Aaron,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 19:22 , Aaron Wood wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test.
>
> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory firmware
> vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled.
>
> Here are
Hi Alan, hi Richard,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 19:02 , Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 23/10/2015, Richard Smith wrote:
>> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test.
>>
>> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory
>> firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled.
>>
>> So I built an
Hi Richard,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 18:43 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 12:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> you are most likely applying the qdisc to the wrong ethernet device or
>> ethernet vlan.
>
> In the cerowrt case it was applied to ge00. If that's not the correct device
> then which one
Hi Richard,
On Oct 23, 2015, at 18:10 , Richard Smith wrote:
> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test.
Nice, I am quite curious how this performs...
>
> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory firmware
> vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled.
Good
Hi Dave,
On Sep 12, 2015, at 15:52 , Dave Taht wrote:
> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022123531
>
> starting at section 2.82 around page 27.
>
> based on this, I am inclined to drop the "just fix the weather radars"
> idea from the fcc comment letter. But a bit more thought and an
Hi Jonathan,
On July 30, 2015 11:56:23 PM GMT+02:00, Jonathan Morton
wrote:
>Hardware people tend to think in terms of simple priority queues, much
>like
>old fashioned military communications (see the original IP precedence
>spec). Higher priority thus gets higher throughput as well as lower
Hi Jonathan,
nice information about the competing schemes (and I do not consider my rant a
proposed scheme ;) )
But looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11e-2005 I learn that
AC_VO gets 1.5ms guaranteed TXOP (roughly air-time), AC_VI gets 3ms and BE and
BK only get a single MSDU.
Oh, boy,
On Jul 23, 2015, at 09:49 , Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 23/07/15 08:44, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>> Link to the spec?
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>>
>>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11e/
Not that I am a domain expert, but the whole web of s
ufferbloat.net. Takes about 150 seconds.
> Download: 5.92 Mbps
> Upload: 0.46 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 152 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 71.877
>10pct: 76.197
> Median: 85.051
> Avg: 84.838
>90pct: 92.105
> Max: 109.600
>
>
terested to learn how this now performs with
netperfrunner and/or betterspeedtest.sh
Best Regards
Sebastian
> Sent 90 bytes 1 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> Class 0
> rate 8500Kbit
> target 5.0ms
> interval
hat means there might be some undiscovered bugs in there.
>
> no overhead allowance. I note.
Well, that should work with the most recent version
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
>
>
> On 10/07/15 20:40, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>&g
gt; Pk delay 0us 0us 0us 0us
>> Av delay 0us 0us 0us 0us
>> Sp delay 0us 0us 0us 0us
>> pkts 0 0 0 0
>> way inds 0
41 bytes 435 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
But this is the hallmark of out of date sqm-scripts, this just uses
cake as leaf qdisc and keeps HTB as the main shaper; a configuration that is
useful for testing. I assume this is the old set of sqm-scri
Hi Jonathan, hi Fred,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 21:18 , Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> qdisc cake 8002: dev pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 850Kbit besteffort
>> flows raw
>
>> qdisc cake 8001: dev ifb4pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 11500Kbit
>> besteffort flows atm overhead 40
>
>> Download: 6.8
Hi Fred,
your results seem to indicate that cake is not active at all, as the latency
under load is abysmal (a quick check is to look at the median in relation to
the min and the 90% number, in your examples all of these are terrible). Could
you please post the result of the following commands
Hi Joe,
On Jul 10, 2015, at 09:22 , Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>> Some questions:
>>>
On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
...
You can flash back the factory fir
Hi Joe,
On Jul 8, 2015, at 22:28 , Joe Touch wrote:
> Hi, Sebastian,
>
> On 7/8/2015 1:15 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 20:37 , Joe Touch wrote:
> ...
>>> The other step, IMO, would be two flags in the OpenWRT list o
Hi Joe,
On Jul 8, 2015, at 20:37 , Joe Touch wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
>
> On 7/7/2015 11:19 AM, Matt Taggart wrote:...
>> This message made me realize I hadn't posted the CC+SQM HOWTO I
>> wrote, maybe it will be useful,
>>
>> https://we.riseup.net/lackof/openwrt
>
> FWIW, this is a big step in the
Hi Joe,
I like your snark… And I like Rich’s elegant restraint in his response, always
polite always friendly.
On Jul 7, 2015, at 06:22 , Joe Touch wrote:
> Hi, Rich,
>
> On 7/6/2015 7:23 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> The OpenWrt firmware project is a "some assembly required" affair
On Jul 1, 2015, at 12:32 , Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, David Lang wrote:
>
>> not true, the switch doesn't give any way for traffic to get from one vlan
>> to the other one, so if you have gig-e connections on both sides, the
>> traffic going from one to the other will hav
1 - 100 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
