On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Oh well yes, this doesnt quite work on !SMP.
>
Strange - how would one assert a spin lock is held, and obviously only for
SMP? (I almost think arch_spin_is_locked(lock) should be ((void)(lock), 1)
for UP for the purpose of assertion...)
Als
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
> > +ycheng
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Maciej Soltysiak
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Oops, apologies if email was formatted weirdly...
&
+ycheng
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> Oops, apologies if email was formatted weirdly...
The problem you described below is separate from the MIPS router crash one,
right? BTW, we've only tested on x86_64 arch.
In addition to tcpdump, "netstat -s | grep -i fastopen"
+ycheng
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Hmm. I would lean towards there being an issue with the new (freshly
> ported forward to 3.7.1) unaligned checksum code for mips based on
> what you say here. Or an offload...
>
> As for the 239.x multicast issue, hmm... separate issue
