ed this kind of behaviour (stuck processes in
FUTEX_WAIT syscall) when running firefly release on Ubuntu 14.04 ?
Thanks,
Simion Rad.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
RAID controller sould be able to help with the journal ops.
Simion Rad.
From: Gregory Farnum [g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:38
To: Simion Rad
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph daemons stucked in FUTEX_WAIT syscall
On Mo
I'll consider looking into more detail at the slow OSDs.
Thank you,
Simion Rad.
From: Gregory Farnum [g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 13:42
To: Simion Rad
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph daemons stucked in FUTEX
vm.swappiness = 0
vm.overcommit_memory = 1
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 36
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 36
kernel.pid_max = 4194303
fs.file-max = 16815744
vm.dirty_ratio = 99
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 99
vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
Thanks,
Simion Rad
vaclient
1/ 5 asok
1/ 1 throttle
-2/-2 (syslog threshold)
-1/-1 (stderr threshold)
max_recent 1
max_new 1000
log_file /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.17.log
--- end dump of recent events ---
2015-07-27 09:55:13.217007 7fd634369700 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) **
in thread 7fd6
Hello,
At my workplace we have a production cephfs cluster (334 TB on 60 OSDs) which
was recently upgraded from Infernalis 9.2.0 to Infernalis 9.2.1 on Ubuntu
14.04.3 (linux 3.19.0-33).
It seems that cephfs still doesn't free up space at all or at least that's what
df command tells us.
Is th
99 TB / 333 TB avail
896 active+clean
client io 47395 B/s rd, 1979 kB/s wr, 388 op/s
From: John Spray
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 22:04
To: Simion Rad
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] cephfs does not seem to pro
, Zheng; Simion Rad
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] cephfs does not seem to properly free up space
That seems to be the bug we have for years now with CephFS. We always
used customized layout.
On 04/20/2016 02:20 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> have you ever used fancy lay
