[ceph-users] Ceph + SAMBA (vfs_ceph)

ad only = No vfs objects = ceph ceph: user_id = samba ceph:config_file = /etc/ceph/ceph.conf Thanks -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + SAMBA (vfs_ceph)

.. [cephfs] create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes kernel share modes = No path = / read only = No vfs objects = ceph ceph: user_id = samba ceph:config_file = /etc/ceph/ceph.conf I cut off some parts I thought were not relevant. -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMa

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + SAMBA (vfs_ceph)

.. [cephfs] create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes kernel share modes = No path = / read only = No vfs objects = ceph ceph: user_id = samba ceph:config_file = /etc/ceph/ceph.conf I cut off some parts I thought were not relevant. -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMa

[ceph-users] Need advice with setup planning

and references I should take a look? Thanks; -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Need advice with setup planning

Replying inline -- Salsa Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, September 20, 2019 1:31 PM, Marc Roos wrote: > > - Use 2 HDDs for SO using RAID 1 (I've left 3.5TB unallocated in case > > I can use it later for storage) > > OS

Re: [ceph-users] Need advice with setup planning

Replying inline. -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, September 20, 2019 1:34 PM, Martin Verges wrote: > Hello Salsa, > >> I have tested Ceph using VMs but never got to put it to use and had a lot of &

[ceph-users] Can't create erasure coded pools with k+m greater than hosts?

failure-domain=host crush-root=default jerasure-per-chunk-alignment=false k=4 m=2 plugin=jerasure technique=reed_sol_van w=8 " From what I've read it seems to be possible to create erasure code pools with higher than hosts K+M. Is this not so? What am I doing wrong? Do I have to create

Re: [ceph-users] Can't create erasure coded pools with k+m greater than hosts?

reate a crush rule using this file? 'ceph osd crush rule create ... -i test.txt' does not work. Am I taking the wrong approach here? -- Salsa Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, October 18, 2019 3:56 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote: > Default

Re: [ceph-users] Can't create erasure coded pools with k+m greater than hosts?

asure 2,1 be ok? There's a very small chance we get 2 extra hosts for each DC in a near future, but we'll probably use all the available storage space in the nearer future. We're trying to use as much space as possible. Thanks; -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https:

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph install from EL7 repo error

I faced that same behaviour, but can't remember whats was happening or how I solved it. Could you please post the commands used? I think it was related to some bad options to ceph-deploy. Are you using '--release nautilus' ? -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.co

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph install from EL7 repo error

Then try running with "--release nautilus". -- Salsa Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 7:30 PM, Cranage, Steve wrote: > No, I’m just running Ceph-deploy install with the one host na