[ceph-users] RGW Multisite Sync Memory Usage

153970795085 .rgw.buckets.index0 497200 0 3721485483 5926323574 360300980 Thanks, Ryan Leimenstoll University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies ___ ceph-users

[ceph-users] Luminous RGW dynamic sharding

candidate phase, I haven’t seen much mention of it. For some time now we have been experiencing blocked requests when deep scrubbing PGs in our bucket index, so this could be quite useful for us. Thanks, Ryan Leimenstoll rleim...@umiacs.umd.edu University of Maryland Institute for Advanced

[ceph-users] rgw resharding operation seemingly won't end

on processing returned error r=-22 Can anyone advise on the best path forward to stop the current sharding states and avoid this moving forward? Some other details: - 3 rgw instances - Ceph Luminous 12.2.1 - 584 active OSDs, rgw bucket index is on Intel NVMe OSDs Thanks, Ryan Leim

Re: [ceph-users] rgw resharding operation seemingly won't end

are somewhat nervous to reenable dynamic sharding as it seems to have contributed to this problem. Thanks, Ryan > On Oct 9, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Ryan Leimenstoll > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We recently upg

[ceph-users] CephFS metadata pool size

there any good rule of thumb or guidance to getting an estimate on this before purchasing hardware? We are expecting upwards of 800T usable capacity at the start. Thanks for any insight! Ryan Leimenstoll rleim...@umiacs.umd.edu University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies

[ceph-users] RGW User Stats Mismatch

admin user stats —uid=USER —sync-stats. While we can no longer replicate the issue since that patch, is there a suggested path forward to rectify the existing user stats that may have been skewed by this bug before the patched release? [0] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14507 Thanks! Ryan Leimen

[ceph-users] "rgw relaxed s3 bucket names" and underscores

hough this is now prohibited by Amazon in US-East and seemingly all of their other regions [0]. Since clients typically follow Amazon’s direction, should RGW be rejecting underscores in these names to be in compliance? (I did notice it already rejects uppercase letters.) Thanks much! Ryan Leimen

Re: [ceph-users] "rgw relaxed s3 bucket names" and underscores

! Best, Ryan [0] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36293 <https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36293> > On Oct 2, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:37:02PM -0400, Ryan Leimenstoll wrote: >> I was hoping to get some clarification on what &

[ceph-users] change radosgw object owner

helpful to have the ability to do this on the radosgw backend. This is especially useful for large buckets/datasets where copying the objects out and into radosgw could be time consuming. Is this something that is currently possible within radosgw? We are running Ceph 12.2.2. Thanks, Ryan

Re: [ceph-users] change radosgw object owner

hood. Thanks, Ryan > On Mar 6, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:40:11PM -0500, Ryan Leimenstoll wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We are trying to move a bucket in radosgw from one user to another in an >> effort both change ow

[ceph-users] cephfs-data-scan safety on active filesystem

/docs/luminous/cephfs/disaster-recovery/#recovery-from-missing-metadata-objects Thanks much, Ryan Leimenstoll rleim...@umiacs.umd <mailto:rleim...@umiacs.umd>.edu University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies ___ ceph-users mailin

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs-data-scan safety on active filesystem

of safety on an offline system? (not sure how long it would take, data pool is ~100T large w/ 242 million objects, and downtime is a big pain point for our users with deadlines). Thanks, Ryan > On May 8, 2018, at 5:05 AM, John Spray wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Ryan Le

[ceph-users] CephFS msg length greater than osd_max_write_size

6 kernel driver. My read here would be that the MDS is sending too large a message to the OSD, however my understanding was that the MDS should be using osd_max_write_size to determine the size of that message [0]. Is this maybe a bug in how this is calculated on the MDS side? Thanks! Ryan Leime

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS msg length greater than osd_max_write_size

reason that this wouldn’t be a HEALTH_ERR condition since it represents a significant service degradation? Thanks! Ryan > On May 22, 2019, at 4:20 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:10 AM Ryan Leimenstoll > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We